Archive for the ‘The Torn Tutu’ Category

Fall for Dance Festival: Program 4

Tuesday, October 12th, 2010

By Rachel Straus

Larry Keigwin’s imagination is as unbound as an attention deficit disorder diagnosed savant. The retro electric pop band Fischerspooner and the drag queen entertainer Murray Hill have sought out his choreographic range. The Martha Graham Dance Company and the New York City Ballet Choreographic Institute commissioned him to make unconventional dances. The Radio City Rockettes employed him as an associate choreographer to shake things up.

On October 6 at City Center, The 38-year-old choreographer’s Megalopolis opened the Fall for Dance Festival’s Program 4 with a Pow! Keigwin’s 2009 work immediately channeled the haughty absurdity of Chris Rock in his infamous role as an interstellar-drag queen-DJ in the movie Fifth Element. Fritz Masten’s silver spacesuit costumes and the dancers’ extroverted antics—pelvic lassoing and Vogueing—screamed Halloween rave party. Keigwin’s work trafficked not in high art.

With 18 performers culled from Keigwin + Company and the Juilliard School’s senior class, Megalopolis upended any semblance of seriousness attached with concert dance. To Steve Reich’s Sextet/Six Marimbas and to excerpts from MIA’s World Town and XR2, Keigwin’s satiric dance referenced a dizzying array of places and people: Martha Graham’s ubiquitous traveling steps and arrow-shaped arms, club kids on stimulants, the antic roar of modern urban life, and nightclub dance floors where the hottest movers (momentarily) rule. John Travolta’s Tony Manero of Saturday Night Fever would have been proud.

Keigwin demonstrates in Megalopolis that he has enough choreographic finesse to develop a movement vocabulary that hangs together. Time will tell whether his choreography—which presently serves to pay homage to pop culture—will get sillier or more serious.

The second work on the program was María Pagés’s Sol, which was made for the brother-daughter duo Carmen and Ángel Corella in honor of the inauguration of their Corella Ballet Castilla Y León. This Spanish ballet company, helmed by Ángel Corella, comes with backing by the Spanish government. Unsurprisingly, Sol looks less like a dance and more like an advertisement for Corella’s enterprise, which will acknowledge native Spanish dance (its music, it sensuality), will present classical and contemporary ballet (as understood by the director who made his name with American Ballet Theatre), and will warm the cockles of audience’s hearts through technical virtuosity (Corella spins like a top).

The program also featured Russell Maliphant’s Afterlight Part 1. In its U.S. premiere, the solo performed by Daniel Proietto demonstrated how tricky it is to choreograph to Eric Satie’s Gnossiennes 1-4. The fin de siècle piano composition sucks the oxygen out of any room because of its power and simplicity. In the first section of the dance, however, Maliphant came close to matching the score’s stark, still quality. Proietto slowly rotated like a dreaming dervish under a well of light care of animator Jan Urbanowski and lighting designer Michael Hulls. The work, which premiered in London in 2009, is inspired by Vaslav Nijinsky’s geometric renderings, which he began drawing obsessively as he spiraled from the heights of dance fame into mental illness. Maliphant captures through darkness, repetition, and Proietto’s sweeping wingspan a sense of sailing into an inescapable place, which in Nijinsky’s case was a sanatorium, where he lived out the rest of his days.

The last work on the program was a world premiere by Jason Samuel Smith & Friends. RHYTHMDOME hung thinly on a story (told in voice over) about a doomed future where tappers and hip hop dancers have lost the means to communicate with each other. The dance appeared equally doomed in the first 10 minutes. Then, like a patient waking from a coma, the group dropped attempts at narrative continuity and got down to the business of tapping and breaking. The revelation came when both sets of dancers riffed off of each other’s rhythms. In the last minutes, the eight dancers found common ground: The tappers “breaked” with their feet; the breakers “tapped” with their muscle fibers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defectors, barefoot mommas, masterworks, premieres, and…

Tuesday, October 5th, 2010

I read Alan Gilbert’s blog and it made me tired. Then I looked at my daily to-do list and realized I’m not far behind  in the work-until-I-drop life in the arts.

Here’s yesterday’s list:

• Wrote a 1000-word article for Dance Teacher magazine about the prolific career of choreographer Robert Alton (c. 1903-1957). Alton created dances for Hollywood films, like “White Christmas” (1954) and Ziegfield Follies (1945), and for Broadway, including a revival of “Pal Joey” (1952), which won him a Tony award. He was a Christian Scientist, a brilliant mimic of choreographers (particularly Martha Graham), and could, according to Agnes de Mille, create choreography “at the speed suggestive of a radio sport commentator, with a whistle between his teeth.”

• Interviewed former Dance Theater of Harlem and Boston Ballet principal Tai Jimenez. Tai will participate in a panel I’m leading at the Juilliard School on October 26 about Bronislava Nijinska’s “Les Noces” (1923). Tai said that the person who stages this masterwork to Stravinsky’s score has a grave responsibility. Dance is an oral tradition. The vitality of a work can only be passed down from performer to performer. The stager should, she says, “see her self as a shaman who passes on her wisdom.”

• Emailed former Bolshoi Ballet and New York City Ballet principal Valentina Kozlova. I asked her to vet her quotes, which I compiled from two interviews done last week. I don’t want this technical wunderkind to think I’m sloppy. Valentina recently announced her decision to hold, with Boston Ballet Artistic Director Mikko Nissinen, an international ballet competition in Boston, beginning in May 2011. Valentina defected from the Soviet Union in 1979. Today she runs a conservatory and trains less than 50 young women in the Vaganova style that has served as the foundational training technique for countless virtuoso dancers, including Mikhail Baryshnikov and Natalie Markarova. I will write a cover story on Valentina for Dance Teacher’s January 2011 issue.

• Wrote dance historian Lynn Garafola, asking whether I was on the right track in my research of Isadora Duncan. My research is for Brooklyn Academy of Music. They contracted me to write a short piece on Duncan, “the mother of modern dance,” for a new book, under the W.W. Norton imprint, in celebration of the institution’s 150 anniversary. I only have 325 words to explain why Isadora was the bomb that broke ballet’s stronghold on opera house audiences.

• Wrote a roundup review for Musical America of three “Fall for Dance” festival programs (September 29 and 30, and October 1). I decided to feature four of the 12 works presented at City Center. My review is too long, but imagine if I wrote about each dance work. I’d be up all night.

There is so much mad in choreographer Faye Driscoll

Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

Like Jonathan Franzen’s highly praised, recently released novel Freedom, Faye Driscoll’s There is so much mad in me craftily portrays human behavior that is as unlikable as it is recognizable. Driscoll populates her mad—which premiered last April and which was reprised by Dance Theater Workshop from September 22 to 25—with nine energetic, solipsistic, violent, sex-crazed young adults. They dance, sing, play, humiliate, rape and torture each other. Driscoll’s dark vision is leavened by her cast’s absurd antics.

On September 22, Driscoll’s 70-minute work began with Nikki Zialcita running in place while Mark Helland held her wrists behind her back. His lock impeded her forward progression downstage. Seeing her bobbing in place produced laughs. Zialcita is small and zophtic and looked under Amanda K. Ringger’s acid-colored lighting a bit like a Robert Crumb cartoon drawing. As the duet evolved in silence, Helland increasingly treated Zialcita like a plaything. Zialcita didn’t object; she squealed with pleasure as he held her throat. This frolic grew, like a glacial creep, disturbing.

The deliberate progression from light to dark and back again is what has put Driscoll on the downtown dance map (The New York Times named her previous work 837 Venice Boulevard as “one of the top five dance shows” of 2008.) Indeed, Driscoll knows how to craft an emotional arc. Her work goes somewhere. Usually it goes to the most cynical place.

In mad Driscoll demonstrates how human relationships are based in and comprised of aggression, manipulation, and victimization. In her third full-length work—structured through a series of vignettes with a Disco-esque sound design care of Brandon Wolcott—Driscoll’s theatricalized examples of human ickyness are thoroughly convincing. Adaku Utah impersonates a charismatic anger-management coach whose following is cowed and then rallied by her violent outbursts. They grow frenzied with delight. They jump up and down like cult members gone nuts. The scene was so convincing I forgot where I was. Then it turned silly through a unison aerobic dance.

Later, Driscoll created her own Abu Ghraib torture and prison abuse scene. There was nothing pat or overly theatrical about the scenario, which culminated with the Tony Orrico barking like a dog. When Orrico joined two lines of eight performers, jogging in lockstep formation like military trainees, Driscoll’s message was clear: This victim will become an aggressor; our species is heading toward its doom.

Despite this nihilistic embrace, Driscoll isn’t hanging up her hat or going the way of David Foster Wallace. After her cast took their bows, she announced the launch of a full-time company in her name. Perhaps her next work will concern the BP oil crisis, the Great Recession, and Lindsey Lohan’s troubles with the law. Being topical, Driscoll knows all too well, is titillating.

P.T. Barnum Move Over

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

“To the greatest dancers on earth,” said New York City Ballet’s Master in Chief Peter Martins. On September 14 the Danish-born master of ceremonies pronounced this while making his annual, launch-the-season vodka toast. I don’t think Martins knew that his grand words echoed those of America’s most influential circus impresario. P.T. Barnum’s “greatest show on earth” began with elephants and trapeze girls walking the ring of the circus floor. On opening night, Martins trotted out “the greatest dancers on earth” one at a time in front of the stage curtain in Barnum-like fashion. As they stood in a line and in an array of costumes (jeans to suits, cocktail dresses to tutus), they looked like kids on their first day of school. Only Gonzalo Garcia bowed with a flourish of the arms as though saying, “The show must go on!”

Unprecedented in City Ballet history, Martins is putting his principal dancers front and center. He is shaking up the House of Balanchine’s historic mission, which has placed greater value on its choreography. Martins’s approach comes in concert with a new marketing campaign that aims to humanize the dancers through images where they are shot casually, candidly, or sexily (as opposed to formally in performance and in costume). These images can be seen in New York’s subway, magazines, and on billboards. They are also hanging along the public walls of the David H. Koch Theater. Marketing dancers’ personalities in consumer venues is one thing. It’s another matter to do it in the theater, where (until now) there appeared documentary style pictures of the company’s evolution or examples of a designer’s work, which helped to contextualize the complex, collaborative process of making ballets. Clearly, City Ballet is evolving.

What thankfully remains the same is the high quality of much of the choreography. Jerome Robbins’s 1979 Four Seasons, which closed the program and is a satire, remains a lesson in choreographic nuance. Funny is hard to do, and Robbins Seasons echoes the earlier Monty Python television series, but without disrespecting ballet’s demands on the body and the mind. Nonetheless, Robbins’s gestural gimmickry in Seasons pokes fun at ballet’s allegorical propensities: The corps dancers of Winter shiver and hug themselves; the women of Summer are pelvic-tilting harem girls; the dancers of Fall caper and rush, resembling leaves whistling down boulevards. During Tuesday’s performance, the dancers equaled Robbins’s choreography. Erica Pereira rose on pointe with a snowflake’s ease. Jennifer Ringer’s ability to use her whole body expressively demonstrates her hard-earned artistic maturity. Rebecca Krohn’s elegantly Mannerist lines and sexy confidence perfectly fits her role as the queen of Summer.

The other two dances on the program were Balanchine’s Serenade (1935) and Martins’s Grazioso (2007). Though it’s been said Serenade is an abstract dance, I see it as autobiography. It was the first ballet Balanchine made in America. Created to Tchaikovsky’s Serenade for Strings, the second section tells the choreographer’s story: A woman (Janie Taylor) emerges from the wings behind a man (Ask Le Cour); she covers his eyes with her hand; he walks forward like a blind missionary and encounters three dancers; he shapes them with his hands like a sculptor. At the ballet’s end, one of these muses (the inestimable Sara Mearns) transforms into a Madonna figure: Mearns is lifted above three porters heads like a Russian icon during a processional. As she exits the stage, she arches her back as though offering herself to her creator. What’s this? It is a highly emotional statement about redemption through artwork. In Serenade Balanchine demonstrates his faith in ballet’s expressive (spiritual) capacity. As the blind man who learns to see through his dancers, he implies he has the vision to develop ballet in the New World.

As for Martins’s Grazioso, it bears resemblance to late 19th century descriptions of the Russian Imperial Ballet, whose lengthy productions featured an endless array of divertissements that had no thematic connection to each other. They did, however, serve to show off each soloist’s technical strengths. Tricks abounded, and some dancers performed with the humanity of carnival barkers. Like these divertissements, Grazioso aims at lightness and virtuosity. What surprises is Martins choice of taking the least laudable aspects of Russian ballet and imitating it. The costumes by Holly Hines don’t help matters. Think Commedia dell’Arte meets a Las Vegas nightclub. Despite the choreographic and design deficiencies, Ashley Bouder, Gonzalo Garcia, Daniel Ulbricht and Andrew Veyette performed their hearts out. Mine goes out to them for their valiant efforts.  

 

 

Post-modern Dance Competition

Tuesday, September 14th, 2010


Seven minutes can feel like an eternity. Or at least that was my thought halfway through the second night of “Festival Twenty Ten” at Dance Theater Workshop. Now in its 16th year, the September 8-11 event featured ten pieces per night. Curated by Robin Staff, the artistic director of Dance/NOW [NYC], it gave 40 choreographers the opportunity to make concise works less than seven minutes long. Yet only three of the ten choreographers, who presented dances on September 9, rose to the occasion. And they, unlike the others, didn’t push it by going to the 6:59-minute mark.

The festival organizers also asked the audience to vote for their favorite number. Called the DanceNOW Challenge (no, I’m not kidding), this participatory process will culminate with one choreographer winning a week-long creative residency in Bucks County, Pennsylvania (the home of the festival’s artistic director), a $1000 stipend, a temporary, paid teaching position at DeSales University, and 20 hours of Manhattan rehearsal space.

Voting, however, is never what it’s cracked up to be. On Thursday night certain works received rousing hands, despite these dances ho hum choreographic and/or performed qualities. The audience, filled with friends and family, was not an impartial lot. I wonder whether the Dance/NOW people will address this papering-the-house problematic. How will the votes be weighed?

My favorite work was Throwaway. Choreographed by John Heginbotham, a Mark Morris dancer, the work wooed as it made fun of the festival’s implicit challenge: to demonstrate craft and deliver an understandable message in seven minutes. In a white bolero jacket, spandex pants, and lacy socks, Brian Lawson appeared like a 1980s suburban teen enamored with Michael Jackson. Lawson Vogued with deadpan demeanor and with the ennui of a TV channel surfer. The music by Thomas Bangalter and Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo was appropriately canned and grooveless. When Maile Okamura joined Lawson under his spotlight, complementing his gestural dis-earnestness and retro costume, Throwaway felt like a cross between Amateur Night at The Apollo and a post-modern dance purification rite.

My runner-up favorite works were A Revolution by Jim Carroll by Iain Rowe and Some Enchanted Believin’ by Maura Nguyen Donohue. But the only connection I could make with Rowe’s work and his Jim Carroll title was the costuming. Carroll, whose Basketball Diaries describes his adolescent descent into heroine and prostitution, appeared to be referenced in Rowe’s choice of a thick, black leather belt that looked vaguely punk or S&M or both. Rowe’s snippet of a solo proved mesmerizing  because he never faced the audience and he never moved. Instead his long, expressive torso and arms undulated like a flame above that black belt, or (but this is pushing it) like a soul seeking to ascend from the blackness of hell.

Donohue’s work, which closed the program, also mined the homage vein. Her spoof on South Pacific was negligible in dance terms. But as a faux musical number it included the following integrated elements: the earnest strumming of guitarist Perry Yung with the joyful vocalizations of Rick Ebihara (who also played the accordian), the marriage of ballet to pseudo Polynesian dance, and four roped-in audience members (who were lassoed at the waist). This number was and looked like a finale.

Addendum: Ellis Wood won the DanceNOW Challenge for her piece titled MOM, which was performed on September 10. The press release stated that the voters did not include the audience, but a panel of choreographers, educators, administrators, critics, and the organizer’s directors. Audience voting participation got the boot.

Dumbing Down with New York City Ballet’s Season Brochure

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

I don’t know how many of you have had the honor of receiving New York City Ballet’s season brochure. When I pulled it out of my mailbox, I briefly mistook it for a Barney’s catalogue. Then I thought Robert Mapplethorpe might have come back from the dead to focus his heated lens on City Ballet’s lithe, muscular performers. Riffling through its pages, I started to feel uneasy. Instead of featuring images of the ballets, the brochure delivers sexy, casual shots of the dancers holding each other tightly and wearing abbreviated clothes (somewhere between lingerie and rehearsal gear). Positioned alongside these black, background lit photographs are quotes from the dancers that could have been lifted from their Facebook pages.

“I can’t wait to see what [Lynne Taylor-Corbett] does with The Seven Deadly Sins,” says Jennie Somogyi. In the full-page photograph, this principal dancer wears black, silk hot pants and looks challengingly into the camera like a cover model selling underwear. Of the ten quotes from the dancers, four of them begin very much the same: “I aspire,” “I’m looking forward,” “I love,” and again, “I love.” The dancers’ thoughts about their favorite ballets are strikingly similar to a Calgon ad. “Serenade is classic! The costumes, music, and mood never get old,” says Tiler Peck. Even more dismaying is Peck’s oddly contradictory costume that comes with her promotional message. She wears a black shift, which is open at her crotch and translucent around her waist. If this is the new little black dress, I’m going back to wearing floor lengths and pastels.

So what is this all about?

Clearly City Ballet is trying to sell their season as intimate and hip. They want their dancers to feel as familiar to us as our long lost high school friends. The dancers’ quotes demonstrate how they are just regular folk who get a kick out of dancing Balanchine’s Jewels. But the brochure does something worse. It takes these talented people’s simple words and highly trained bodies and presents them together to form a compellingly stupid contradiction: City Ballet principals look as sexualized and sculptural as Mapplethorpian objets d’art; they talk just like the girls and boys of Sesame Street!

I’m deeply offended.

This brochure dumbs down City Ballet’s greatness. These dancers, no matter how hard they try, will never be average folk. The company’s repertoire isn’t merely a sexy, fun vehicle for them. The experience of watching City Ballet is more than a happy-go-lucky affair. I don’t know why dynamic images of dancers moving (let alone plucky description of dances) isn’t considered marketable.

So now I will make my City Ballet season pitch:

Please go to the tiny text and orange-colored headlines buried in this brochure. There you will find something worth looking at. City Ballet is offering 64 dances, four of which will be world premieres, this season. Among this embarrassment of riches will be ballets by George Balanchine, Jerome Robbins, Christopher Wheeldon, Peter Martins, Mauro Bigonzetti, Alexei Ratmansky, Wayne McGregor, and Benjamin Millepied. Some of the most interesting dancers working today will perform these choreographers’ ballets. They include Sara Mearns, Wendy Whelan, Theresa Reichlen, Sterling Hyltin, Andrew Veyette, and Sean Suozzi. The season begins September 14. On arrival at Lincoln Center, please feel free to check your Facebook worldview at the door. Feel free to embrace your inner elitist who is dying to experience more than the sweetly familiar or the sexually manufactured.

 

 

 

 

The Virtual Pillow

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

“The rabbit-hole went straight on like a tunnel for some way, and then dipped suddenly down, so suddenly that Alice had not a moment to think about stopping herself before she found herself falling down a very deep well.”—Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll

That’s how I felt when I began using the Internet.

But I’m no longer so Victorian. Tunneling takes me to places I never intended to go. It’s the new normal. Yet the Internet is a virtual rabbit hole. How to find small Wonderlands, and not just quagmires of unembellished junk, is the real question.

Recently, I made my way up the ladder-like road that leads to the Jacob’s Pillow Dance Festival in Becket, MA. Besides my work as a festival summer scholar (who gives pre-performance talks and such), I learned about how America’s oldest continuously running dance festival is trying to shape their presence on the net.

In 2008 the Pillow’s effort went into higher gear when the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation gave the festival more than $1M. Unlike most grants, this one doesn’t overly define how their money should be spent. But General Manager Connie Chin says that some of the money is earmarked toward a project called the Virtual Pillow.

So, I checked in with Virtual Pillow Project Manager Lisa Niedermeyer about how the festival, which boasts three stages, is connecting with the broadband world beyond their rural doorstop. “If the Pillow is going to grow, how are we going to do it?” questioned Niedermeyer, a former Pillow performer. “The answer is to do it online. The Virtual Pillow is the fourth stage.”

The goal, however, is not to stream an entire live festival performance. Nor will The Pillow attempt to create an online simulacrum of being at their hallowed grounds where Ted Shawn’s Men Dancers performed during the Depression for local ladies over tea and cakes.

The idea of how to grow is much more inimitable, much more Lewis Carroll.

It begins with PillowTalks, which are curated by Director of Preservation Norton Owen and made accessible on FORA.tv via a media partnership. These talks feature choreographers, visual artists, and writers whose work connects directly or tangentially to performances at The Pillow. So far there are only eight edited PillowTalk videos. All are under ten minutes. My favorite FORA.tv/Pillow film features choreographer Barak Marshall describing the experience of dancing for an anti-Israeli crowd:

Barak Marshall: Dance Bridging Cultures

Clearly The Pillow isn’t spending their money fast or creating flash mobs scenarios. They are testing the waters and trying to find out what a surfing public, that isn’t dance mad, is interested in learning about their field.

When I first heard about the Virtual Pillow, it sounded overly grand and potentially unwieldy. But it is not. It’s a carefully curated project in its nascent stage. Like Alice, who goes down the rabbit hole to find out why a white rabbit is speaking English and is holding a timepiece, I want to follow this new project. Its deliberate coyness intrigues me. I don’t think it will become a morass of material, clogging up my broadband.


Ballet drag

Monday, August 16th, 2010

Most drag queens develop their outré identities in backroom clubs and on dimly lit cabaret floors. Chase Johnsey discovered his alter ego in a much more rarified atmosphere: On opera house stages across the globe, performing female leads in Le Corsaire and Dying Swan. At age 18, Johnsey joined Les Ballets Trockadero de Monte Carlo, the world’s finest all-male travesty ballet company. Today the 24-year-old is the most convincingly feminine and technically accomplished “female” dancer in the 36-year old company. On August 12, while watching Johnsey dance as Yakaterina Verbosovich at the Jacob’s Pillow Dance Festival, I heard a continual comment emerge from audience members’ mouths: “That’s a guy?”

The disbelief over Johnsey’s sexuality isn’t a superficial one. It’s not just that he looks like a young woman because he is small boned and under 5’4”. He dances like the softer sex. The elasticity of his spine, the delicacy of his pointe work, and the sprightliness of his jump are what make him a bonafide ballerina. With his tutu and a tiara, he is also confusingly similar in look to other ballerinas, like Jennifer Ringer or Ashley Bouder (both of the New York City Ballet). In contrast, his fellow Trocks dancers come across as guys impersonating female ballet dancers. They have calves like soccer players and pecs like swimmers. They get the laughs. Johnsey gets the hushed gasps.

In the female solo variation of Le Corsaire, Johnsey effortlessly pulled off 32 fouettes. But what came as an even greater surprise was the discovery of his very public, off stage life. On YouTube Johnsey has posted 38 videos about his female drag persona Serenity. This alter ego isn’t related to his ballerina one. Johnsey, in a blond wig and full make up, talks and acts like a young Paris Hilton (discussing the merits of owning a Louis Vuitton clutch bag and of developing inner beauty). In the You Tube video called Transformation, he films himself changing from Johnsey into Serenity through a meticulous application of makeup and hair. 1,025,079 viewers have seen this video. Talk about a following. It’s practically a movement.

Johnsey’s decision to be a post-performance drag queen harkens back to the good old days of the Ballet Trockadero. In 1974, the original members performed at underground clubs. They made their debut in a 2nd floor loft space on 14th street in the heart of the meatpacking district, then ground zero for the New York transvestite crowd.

But times have changed for the Trocks. They’ve gone mainstream. In more than 250 cities, the company entertains nice bourgeois folk, sometime 2,000 of them at a time. Their show’s ticket prices can go as high as $300 each (calculating exchange rates). Johnsey’s determination to put his Corsaire wig down and hit the gay club scene as Serenity seems like a lot of work and effort. Johnsey, however sees it differently.  “If I can be a ballerina,” he drawls on YouTube, “I can definitely be a drag queen.”

Jacob’s Pillow Dance Festival: Never a Dull Moment

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

If you’ve ever sat in the theater watching a dance and wondered how the performers went from working with the choreographer in the studio to being masters of their own movement on the stage, the Emmy award-winning filmmaker Elliot Caplan has made just the documentary for you. It’s called 15 Days of Dance – The Making of Ghost Light. On August 5 at the Jacob’s Pillow Dance Festival, Caplan spent an hour describing his process and showing an excerpt of his 2010 film. Why just an excerpt? Because 15 Days is 22.5 hours long.

Clearly not a commercial enterprise, 15 Days bears the mark of Caplan’s advanced station as a documentary filmmaker of dance. Like Merce Cunningham, who gave him his first job filming dancers (and whom he served for 15 years as the company’s filmmaker in residence), Caplan records movement from unconventional perspectives. In 15 days, he digs deep into the ritualistic process of—watch, do, repeat, watch, do, repeat—that is the basis for most dance creation. While this process may sound like a snore, it is not. The twelve dancers of the American Ballet Theatre Studio Company, who are the center of the film, are hothouse flowers. All under age 20, they are schooled within an inch of their life in the rigors of classical technique. It’s fascinating watching them take codified ballet movements (passé, pirouette, penché) and slowly fashion them into the narrative threads that give choreographer Brian Reeder’s Ghost Light its glow.

Wearing a Yankee baseball cap and sitting with Jacob’s Pillow Scholar in Residence Maura Keefe, Caplan demonstrated that he is a devotional dance documenter—and a mensch. While most dance documenters arrive on the scene when the dance is done and paid for, in the case of 15 Days Caplan took the initiative. He convinced the University at Buffalo, where he serves as a professor and the Center for the Moving Image’s artistic director, to foot the bill for the creation of a dance. When Caplan got the funding, he made two calls: to New York City Ballet and American Ballet Theatre. The ABT Studio Company called back first. They recommended for the job the choreographer Brian Reeder, a frequent contributor to the company’s repertoire.

Formerly a dancer with ABT, New York City Ballet, and Ballet Frankfurt, Reeder doesn’t mind being around moving cameras while making a dance in the breathless space of 15 days. His ballet, set to a recording of Aaron Copland’s Music for the Theater with Leonard Bernstein conducting, pays homage to the mix of sleaze and innocence redolent of vaudevillian stage culture.

Yet 15 Days isn’t focused on the ballet’s subject or the final product. Caplan documents the job of dancers, working day in and day out in a bare bones studio. In the half-hour segment seen at The Pillow, Caplan creates a near seamless compilation of the 15 days in which the dancers learned Reeder’s material. We see the dance from beginning to the end, but it’s not in a continuous spate of time. At the beginning of the rehearsal process (and the dance), the performers are tentative. Watching them is at times is cringe-making: many of the women have bodies of 12 years olds and their vamping like vaudevillians just doesn’t cut it. Yet by the end of the 15 days (and the end of the ballet), the dancers almost own the material. (And the pixy leg blond, who I noticed most, has acquired just enough je ne sais quoi to deliver a sexy backbend).

Ultimately, this section resembles time-lapse film. As the lithe dancers repeat, absorb, and own Reeder’s choreographic material, it’s like watching petals of an exotic flower opening in slow motion. When the dancers take command of the material, the film blossoms.

You can see three of the 20 segments of Caplan’s epic work on how a dance is created from the ground up by going to 15DaysOfDance.com. It’s worth the trip.

As for the Jacob’s Pillow Dance Festival, where this free event took place, it is a dance Mecca. Anyone interested in the following—ballet, modern, jazz; Butoh, Flamenco, tap; dance film, dance history, and historical dance sites (the Pillow is a National Historic Landmark)—should make a pilgrimage to Becket, Massachusetts in the Berkshires. It’s only a 20-minute drive from Tanglewood. It’s beyond special. http://www.jacobspillow.org/

Roxane Butterfly at Joe’s Pub

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

Most people tap with their feet. Roxane Butterfly began her July 31 performance at Joe’s Pub with a little soft shoe of the hand. It paved the way for the unconventional fare to come: Her confessional, spoken word musings; her call and response, improvised, rhythmic exchanges with the pianist Frederique Trunk and the upright electric bassist Hill Greene; her impromptu finale in which three tap friends hoofed it with the bell bottom wearing lady. Overall, the proceedings had the air of a beatnik revival.

Through Butterfly’s performance format was anything but tight and her costume was anything but chic, this dancer is no flake with her taps. Her mentor Jimmy Slyde, the bebop tap master, gave her his seal of approval, when she moved to New York from France to immerse herself in America’s dance patois. After achieving some well-deserved and hard-worn name recognition in the city’s fiercely competitive dance scene, Butterfly told us that she began to feel the weight of life on and off stage: “I don’t know how I managed,” she said, “to remain in New York for 20 years and remain somewhat romantic.” New York’s tap scene, with its emphasis on virtuoso speed, can be crushing. So Butterfly moved on. Today she calls Barcelona her home, with the understanding that she still spends a good portion of the year on the road.

For her New York homecoming, Butterfly’s one nightstand at Joe’s Pub started as a reflective affair. Not only did she explain to the audience why she left Manhattan, she gave us a taste of her rocky love life. Channeling the voice of what appeared to be her lover, she said, “I hate falling in love with you white bitch. I hate mixing my blood with yours.” Wow. Talk about a theatrical bombshell. I instantly felt like a voyeur. But just as quickly as Butterfly flitted into this heavy emotional territory, she slid out, launching into a solo that was the best of the evening: growing in rhythmic complexity, wholly improvised, and one that was prepossessing without being a grand stander.

Butterfly isn’t one of those performers who agonizes about every little choice she makes. Some times I wish she would. Her poetry—“when morning creeps into night, aching with shame you hear the blame”—leaves a lot to be desired. But her generosity of spirit is infectious. When she invited three of her former tap performer colleagues on stage, she didn’t get annoyed when one of them, the virtuoso tapper Tamango, began hogging the tiny space with his hard-hitting sounds. She also didn’t seem to mind that the evening was going in a completely different direction—away from a feminist act interspersed by nuanced interchanges with her musicians—and toward a reunion of “La Cave,” the underground tap dance scene from the 1990s.

Butterfly’s hodgepodge format worked fine at Joe’s Pub. The place has history, and so does Butterfly. At the end of the evening, she announced that the baby crying at the show’s beginning was hers. In the future I expect to see baby Butterfly on stage with momma. My only hope is that the two will focus more on tapping than on letting their lips fly.