Archive for the ‘Law and Disorder: Performing Arts Division’ Category

Newer Entries »

Generic Forms: A Prescription For Trouble

Tuesday, May 1st, 2012

By Brian Taylor Goldstein

HELLO –

How can an organization that presents music programs, and puts some of them on the Internet, find a good general release form for artists/speakers to sign?

The tricky part about forms is not finding them, but choosing which one is right. There are lots of sources for good general release forms—the Internet, formbooks, colleagues, etc. We provide a list of formbooks that we recommend on our website www.ftmartslaw-pc.com. However, to select the right form, you need to know what you need.

A “release” is just another word for “permission”, and, like all other contracts, it memorializes an agreement between two parties. So, in order to know what form you need, you need to know what permissions you need and what permission the other party is willing to grant. For example, if you are presenting a music program and you want a form through which a musician will give you the right to record their performance and place it on the internet, you will want a form that addresses the following issues: (1) Is the musician expecting to get an extra fee in exchange for granting permission?(2) Do you want to place the entire performance on the Internet, or just excerpts?(3) Will you be posting the performing on your own website or on other websites such as YouTube?(4) Can you leave the recording up indefinitely, or will the musician be able to tell you to take it down? (5) If there is more than one musician performing, such as a band or ensemble, will you require a release from each performer or does one person have the right to grant permission on behalf of everyone else? and, perhaps most importantly, (6) Is the musician performing his or her own music? Remember: unless the musician is also performing music he or she wrote themselves, they cannot give you permission to record it. You will need to get that permission from the composer as well as from the musicians.

There is no “generic” permission form or release that will apply to everyone in every situation. Any form or any contract is only “good” if it addresses all of the elements of your specific circumstances and successfully communicates the understanding between the parties and covers all of the necessary. It may not surprise you to learn how often I have been contacted by someone who found what they believed was a “generic” form, filled in the blanks, and found out too late that it didn’t give them the rights or permissions they needed for their specific circumstances. So, when it comes to forms, don’t go for the generic…go for the prescription you need. Before you go hunting around for the right form, first figure out what you need, then start reading and editing forms and until you get the one that fits just right.

________________________________________________________________

For additional information and resources on this and other legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ftmartslaw-pc.com.

To ask your own question, write to lawanddisorder@musicalamerica.org.

All questions on any topic related to legal and business issues will be welcome. However, please post only general questions or hypotheticals. FTM Arts Law reserves the right to alter, edit or, amend questions to focus on specific issues or to avoid names, circumstances, or any information that could be used to identify or embarrass a specific individual or organization. All questions will be posted anonymously.

__________________________________________________________________

THE OFFICIAL DISCLAIMER:

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!

The purpose of this blog is to provide general advice and guidance, not legal advice. Please consult with an attorney familiar with your specific circumstances, facts, challenges, medications, psychiatric disorders, past-lives, karmic debt, and anything else that may impact your situation before drawing any conclusions, deciding upon a course of action, sending a nasty email, filing a lawsuit, or doing anything rash!

Tags:, , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Arts Management, Contracts, Copyrights, Law and Disorder: Performing Arts Division, Licensing, Music Rights, Recordings, Venues | Comments Closed

Sneaking Artists Into The US: How Lucky Do You Feel?

Wednesday, April 25th, 2012

By Brian Taylor Goldstein

Dear FTM Arts Law:

I represent a British group that frequently tours the US. In the past, the guys have just entered as visitors under the ESTA/Visa Waiver Scheme. So far, we have never had any problems, but I was recently told this was wrong. Is this true? Couldn’t they just say they are not performing?

This one is easy: Is this true? YES. Couldn’t they just say they are not performing? NO!

The ESTA/Visa Waiver Scheme is a program through which citizens of 36 countries (Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brunei, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, San Marino, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom) can enter the US as “visitors” with only their passports. Unlike citizens from countries such as Russia, China, or Iran, citizens of one of the 36 “visa waiver” countries do not need to obtain an actual visitor visa from a US Consulate before entering the US. All they need to do is pre-register through the on-line Electronic System for Travel Authorization (“ESTA”) website. However, the ESTA/Visa Waiver Scheme only allows such citizens to enter as “visitors”, subject to all of the limitations and restrictions of a visitor visa.

If an artist from a visa waiver country wishes to perform in the US, he or she needs to obtain an actual artist visa, such as an O or a P visa. Artists from a visa waiver country who enter the US under the ESTA/Visa Waiver Scheme cannot perform, regardless of whether or not they are paid and regardless of whether or not tickets are sold. The need for an artist visa (either an O or a P) is triggered by performance, not payment.

If an artist tells a US border officer that they are not performing, when, in fact, they intend to perform, this constitutes a fraudulent entry. Fraud is always a bad thing. Fraud against the US Government is a very bad thing. While you may have not have had any problems thus far, this has been due to pure luck. I know of a group from Canada that for more than five years regularly entered the US as visitors to perform their concerts. Typically, they told the border officer they were coming to “rehearse” or “jam with friends.” However, last year, their luck ran out. A border officer on a slow day decided to Google the name of one of the musicians and discovered their website listing all of their forthcoming US engagements. The group has now been barred from performing in the US! I know of other instances where, though the artists have not been barred from future US travel, their ESTA/Visa Waiver privileges have been permanently revoked, requiring them to forever obtain visitor visas even where they legitimately wish to enter the US as visitors.  In short, your odds of continued success decrease each time your artists enter the US on the Visa Waiver Scheme with the intent to perform. As for lying to a border officer…I hear the weather in Guantanamo is quite lovely this time of year!

___________________________________________________________________

For additional information and resources on this and other legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ftmartslaw-pc.com.

To ask your own question, write to lawanddisorder@musicalamerica.org.

All questions on any topic related to legal and business issues will be welcome. However, please post only general questions or hypotheticals. FTM Arts Law reserves the right to alter, edit or, amend questions to focus on specific issues or to avoid names, circumstances, or any information that could be used to identify or embarrass a specific individual or organization. All questions will be posted anonymously.

__________________________________________________________________

THE OFFICIAL DISCLAIMER:

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!

The purpose of this blog is to provide general advice and guidance, not legal advice. Please consult with an attorney familiar with your specific circumstances, facts, challenges, medications, psychiatric disorders, past-lives, karmic debt, and anything else that may impact your situation before drawing any conclusions, deciding upon a course of action, sending a nasty email, filing a lawsuit, or doing anything rash!

Tags:, , , , ,
Posted in Artist Management, Law and Disorder: Performing Arts Division, Touring, Uncategorized, Visas | Comments Closed

Do We Need ASCAP/BMI Licenses?

Wednesday, April 18th, 2012

By Brian Taylor Goldstein

Hello Law and Disorder,

We have met numerous times at conferences, (I love going to your sessions!) and you have been very helpful with questions about our presenting contracts. We also rent our facility and I now have a question about that side.  We recently received a letter from BMI stating that a few of our rental clients have not paid their licensing fees and that we are now responsible for the fees. Can they do that?  We have it stated in our rental contract that the user is responsible of ASCAP/BMI fees, is that enough to get us out of it? If BMI can hold us accountable for the artist fees how do we protect our self in the future? I appreciate your advice, thank you.

Thanks for coming to our sessions! As for your question: Yes, they can do that! As the owner/operator of a performance space/venue, it is your legal responsibility to ensure that necessary rights and authorizations have been obtained with respect to all copyrighted music which is publicly performed in your venue. (Actually, your legal responsibility is not limited to performance rights, but extends to dramatic rights as well as any other required rights and licenses which pertain to music, images, trademarks, recordings, images, or other protected rights or materials being used or performed in your space.) In other words, while there is certainly nothing wrong with requiring your “users” to be responsible for ASCAP/BMI fees, that will not relieve you from ultimate responsibility if they fail to do so. In fact, there is no contract, release, or any other document which will protect your venue from liability should one of your users fail to obtain the necessary authorization or licenses they need for their performance. However, there are several things you can do to better manage your liability and minimize your risk:

First, you’ll not only want to ensure that your contract states that the user is responsible for all licenses and authorizations, but you’ll also want your contract to state that the user will “hold harmless and indemnify” your venue if they fail to obtain the necessary licenses and authorizations. In essence, this means that the user will have to reimburse you for any costs and expenses you incur if you are required to pay for licenses, incur legal expenses, or suffer any other damages or losses because your users failed to obtain the rights and licenses they were supposed to. (They’d probably have to do that anyway, but an indemnification and hold harmless provisions makes that obligation explicit.)

Second, there are many venues which require users to produce “proof” that they have all of the required licenses prior to the first performance date as a condition of being allowed to use the space. This gives you a chance to assess whether or not the appropriate licenses have actually been obtained.

Third, you should obtain your obtain your own blanket licenses directly from ASCAP and BMI, as well as from SESAC. These three organizations issues blanket licenses directly to venues such as yours to ensure that any music from their catalogs is properly licensed for public performances. While this will require you to keep a running account of all music publicly performed at your venue as well as to incur the license costs yourself, you can pass the costs along to your users through your rental fees. Its also the best and only way to ensure that your legal responsibility as the owner/manager of the venue is being met, at least with regard to performances licenses. You’ll still need to make sure your users obtain the other right and licenses they may require for their performances.

Lastly, I would consult with other venues of similar size and nature to your own and see if they already have licensing policies and procedures that you might be able to adopt for your own use. There’s no need to reinvent the wheel where others have already rolled it up the hill—just beware of any venue that tells you either: “We just ignore all of that stuff and haven’t been caught yet!” or “Those rules don’t apply to non-profits.” Run away!

_____________________________________________________________

For additional information and resources on this and other legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ftmartslaw-pc.com.

To ask your own question, write to lawanddisorder@musicalamerica.org.

All questions on any topic related to legal and business issues will be welcome. However, please post only general questions or hypotheticals. FTM Arts Law reserves the right to alter, edit or, amend questions to focus on specific issues or to avoid names, circumstances, or any information that could be used to identify or embarrass a specific individual or organization. All questions will be posted anonymously.

__________________________________________________________________

THE OFFICIAL DISCLAIMER:

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!

The purpose of this blog is to provide general advice and guidance, not legal advice. Please consult with an attorney familiar with your specific circumstances, facts, challenges, medications, psychiatric disorders, past-lives, karmic debt, and anything else that may impact your situation before drawing any conclusions, deciding upon a course of action, sending a nasty email, filing a lawsuit, or doing anything rash!

Tags:, , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Arts Management, Contracts, Copyrights, Law and Disorder: Performing Arts Division, Licensing, Music Rights, Non-Profits, Presenters, Venues | Comments Closed

Can I Fire My Board Members?

Wednesday, April 11th, 2012

By Brian Taylor Goldstein

Dear Law and Disorder:

Many years ago I founded a successful non-profit dance company. Over the years, we have continued to grow by adding board members, increasing donations, and critically acclaimed performances. However, my current board has become too invasive. In the past, I have always given them reports about the upcoming season, plans, new artists, etc, and they have focused on fundraising. As the founder and artistic director, it has always been clear that I was always in charge. Now, some of the newer board members are starting to demand financial reports and budgetary control. The new board chair recently wanted to be involved in interviewing a new development director I wanted to hire! My understanding has always been that the legal role of the board was only to raise money. How do I stop this situation before it gets worse? Is this something I can address in the by-laws? Can I fire the board members? What are my legal options?

 

First, and foremost, congratulations! Clearly, under your leadership, you have created a viable and sustainable organization for which you deserve an extraordinary amount of credit. For the purposes of your question, I am going to presume your non-profit has also been approved for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status by the IRS. This is important because not all non-profit organizations are also tax exempt. A non-profit organization, like its for-profit cousin, can organize and operate in whatever manner its founder or owners decide—subject only to whatever restrictions may be imposed by the law of the state in which it is formed. However, a non-profit which has also applied and been granted tax-exempt status under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code must operate under very specific guidelines in order to maintain its tax-exempt status.

In applying for and receiving 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, the founders of the non-profit are striking a grand bargain with the IRS pursuant to which, in exchange for permitting donations to the organization to be deductible and exempting the organization from having to pay taxes on its income, the founder must forfeit sole control and ownership. Like a scene from a Dickensian novel, once a non-profit organization applies for and receives 501(c)(3) status, its founder abandons the organization on the steps of society. It becomes an “orphan” whose care and welfare is left to the community. The community is represented by the board of directors, which is then charged with overseeing the management and operations of the tax-exempt non-profit to ensure that it continues to serve its mission and tax-exempt purposes. The artistic director and founder can—and, in my opinion, should—serve on the board of directors, but the organization is no longer owned by anyone. In short, it is not “your” organization. It is not anyone’s organization. It belongs to the community and, as such, the authority and control of the organization rests solely in the board of directors.

In your situation, it sounds as if your board is transitioning from a culture where you have understandably been given much deference to one where the board wants to assert more control and oversight. While I understand that this can be frustrating in many respects, it can also offer many positive opportunities for growth and sustainability. A healthy tax-exempt organization requires a constant exchange of expertise and experience between the board members, administration, and artistic leaders who must in turn balance many competing considerations in carrying out the organization’s mission: art and business; emotion and practicality; innovation and tradition. Even in a situation where an organization’s founder might be perceived as the best person to arbitrate such things, the organization’s by-laws cannot legally bestow upon any one individual—the founder, the board chairman, the artistic director—sole control and authority. Unless the board has some degree of meaningful control and oversight authority, not only does the organization risk losing its 501(c)(3) status, but also jeopardizes its relevancy and viability as a community institution. On the other hand, while the board needs to have control over major decisions—such as the hiring and firing of the artistic director or whether or not to raise funds for a new production—if the board asserts too much control, it risks losing its artistic legitimacy. The surest path to artistic disaster is to allow a board of well-meaning attorneys, business leaders, and wealthy patrons to dictate casting, programming, or other similar artistic decisions. These are extraordinarily difficult and perilous paths to navigate, to be sure, and are littered with organizations who, in either failing to address these issues correctly or ignoring them completely, have fallen into the abyss of bitter feelings, splintered boards, burned out staff, depleted endowments, and even bankruptcy.

Rather than looking for a means to assert—or maintain—absolute control, it sounds as if the time has come for you and your board to evaluate the organization’s operations and structure. Among other things, does your organization have the right balance of wealth and wisdom, both financial and artistic, on its board? Is there a plan should you, as artistic director, want to retire or take a less active role? What if an overly-aggressive board chair presents itself? How are decisions made? Now is the time to reflect not just upon your by-laws, but the policies, strategies, and procedures necessary to ensure a healthy balance that can sustain the future of the organization you have nurtured this far.

__________________________________________________________________

For additional information and resources on this and other legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ftmartslaw-pc.com.

To ask your own question, write to lawanddisorder@musicalamerica.org.

All questions on any topic related to legal and business issues will be welcome. However, please post only general questions or hypotheticals. FTM Arts Law reserves the right to alter, edit or, amend questions to focus on specific issues or to avoid names, circumstances, or any information that could be used to identify or embarrass a specific individual or organization. All questions will be posted anonymously.

__________________________________________________________________

THE OFFICIAL DISCLAIMER:

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!

The purpose of this blog is to provide general advice and guidance, not legal advice. Please consult with an attorney familiar with your specific circumstances, facts, challenges, medications, psychiatric disorders, past-lives, karmic debt, and anything else that may impact your situation before drawing any conclusions, deciding upon a course of action, sending a nasty email, filing a lawsuit, or doing anything rash!

Tags:, , , , , , , ,
Posted in Arts Management, For Profits, Law and Disorder: Performing Arts Division, Non-Profits, Presenters | Comments Closed

Posting Musical Performances on YouTube

Wednesday, April 4th, 2012

By Robyn Guilliams

Dear Law and Disorder,

What are the copyright issues in posting a performance of a piece of music on YouTube for global streaming?  And, since people can easily download YouTube content, what are the implications for the person who’s posted it, or the downloaders for that matter?

Before answering your question, I want to clarify that there are two separate copyrights in a videotape of a musical performance – the copyright in the music contained in the video, and the copyright in the video itself.  The copyright is usually owned by the creator of a work.  In the case of the musical composition, the copyright would be owned by the composer (or perhaps the composer’s publisher, if he or she has one.)  In the case of the video, the owner of the copyright would be whoever created the video (and NOT the individual performers – which is a common misconception!)

Now, on to your question…  The answer depends on who owns the copyrights to the video, and the underlying music in the video.  If you make a video of yourself performing your own music, and you post that video on YouTube, there are no copyright issues.  Because you own the music being performed, AND you own the video, you have the right to post that video on YouTube or anywhere else on the Internet.

However, the answer changes if you don’t own the music.  If the musical copyright is owned by someone else, you would need that person’s permission to perform the music (i.e., a performance license for the music), to videotape the performance (a synchronization license), AND to broadcast that video via the Internet (a performance license for the video).  Of course, it’s not necessary to have three separate documents, but you would want to be sure you have all of the permissions you need in one license!

The answer also depends on who owns the videotape of the performance.  As noted above, the owner of a video usually will be the person who creates the video.  So, if you perform your own music, but someone else records that performance, then that person will own the video, and you would need that person’s permission to post the video on YouTube.

Downloads implicate yet another potential license requirement – a distribution license!  If you don’t have a right to distribute the video – or the music contained in the video – both you and the illegal downloader could be liable to the copyright holders.

The moral here is that, before posting any audio or video recording on the Internet, be sure you have all of the necessary permissions – preferably in writing!

__________________________________________________________________________

For additional information and resources on this and other legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ftmartslaw-pc.com.

To ask your own question, write to lawanddisorder@musicalamerica.org.

All questions on any topic related to legal and business issues will be welcome. However, please post only general questions or hypotheticals. FTM Arts Law reserves the right to alter, edit or, amend questions to focus on specific issues or to avoid names, circumstances, or any information that could be used to identify or embarrass a specific individual or organization. All questions will be posted anonymously.

__________________________________________________________________

THE OFFICIAL DISCLAIMER:

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!

The purpose of this blog is to provide general advice and guidance, not legal advice. Please consult with an attorney familiar with your specific circumstances, facts, challenges, medications, psychiatric disorders, past-lives, karmic debt, and anything else that may impact your situation before drawing any conclusions, deciding upon a course of action, sending a nasty email, filing a lawsuit, or doing anything rash!

Tags:, , , , , , , ,
Posted in Copyrights, Law and Disorder: Performing Arts Division, Licensing, Music Rights, Recordings, Uncategorized | Comments Closed

Can My Artist Perform In The US As A Visitor?

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

By Brian Taylor Goldstein

Dear Brian,

I wanted to ask your advice about the visa needs of one of my artists. The artist is going to the USA twice this year to work. The first time will be to conduct a youth orchestra in rehearsals and a concert. The contract for this engagement is between the orchestra and my agency (based in London) and my agency will be receiving the fee. Therefore, I think I’m right in saying that the Artist will definitely need an O1 visa. (Their lawyer says that the Artist does not need a visa, but I think they are wrong.) The second engagement is slightly different, in that the artist is going to a school, but simply to do a series of talks and group discussions, not to conduct any public performance of any kind. It is almost certain that he is not receiving a fee for this, but his flights will be reimbursed by them. Having said this, if the school books his flights for him, then there may be no exchange of money at all. Will he need a full-blown visa for this engagement, as well? If not, what does he need? Many thanks in advance for your help.

Thanks for giving me this chance to address a common misunderstanding: many people believe—incorrectly—that if an artist is not paid in the US or if he or she is paid through an agent or a corporation, then no visa is required. Nothing can be further from the truth. A proper work visa (usually either an O or P visa) is required anytime a foreign artist “performs” in the United States—regardless of how they are paid or how much they are paid or where they are paid or who receives payment or even if they perform for free before an appreciative audience of starving orphans and poor widows! What triggers the need for a work visa is neither payment nor an exchange of money, but, rather, “performance.” Except for a few narrowly defined exceptions—including auditions and competitions—a foreign artist can never legally perform in the United States on a visitor visa (or, if applicable, by entering under the visa waiver program). Any time a foreign artist performs in the United States, a work visa is required.

So, with regard to your Artist’s engagement with the youth orchestra, you are absolutely correct! Your artist will definitely need an O-1 visa. Please refer what I suspect is the orchestra’s well-meaning, but ill-informed, board member to www.artistsfromabroad.org. And do not succumb to the pressure of being assured that their organization has never had to obtain visas for other foreign artists, has never been caught, everyone else does this, etc. etc. Make no mistake. Its not the orchestra taking the risk here—its your artist! If your artist is caught, the worst that happens to the orchestra is a quick search for a replacement, or, at worst, a cancelled concert. For your artist, he could be subject to future travel restrictions and bans that could ruin his future opportunities in the United States.

This is not to say that payment is never relevant, merely that it is not the deciding factor. The first step in any analysis of this nature is not payment, but performance. If the artist is not performing, then the second question is whether or not any fees are being paid. Which brings me to the question of your artist’s engagement at the school. You write that he is being engaged “… simply to do a series of talks and group discussions, not to conduct any public performance of any kind.” Excellent. That means he is not “performing”, thus, unless he is receiving a fee, a work visa will not be required. See how this works? Reimbursement for actual costs or even having actual costs covered is not the same thing as receiving a fee. If he were receiving an honorarium or a “flat fee” which he could apply towards his costs, as opposed to actual reimbursement, that would be a different matter indeed, but that does not appear to be the case here. As a result, your artist will not need an O-1 for the school engagement, but could enter either on a visitor visa or, if applicable, under the visa-waiver program. Nevertheless, if the two engagements at issue are reasonably close together, I would strongly advise you to obtain a single O-1 visa with sufficient classification to cover both engagements. Not only would this alleviate any guesswork, but it would remove the risk of adverse questions from a poorly-trained border troll (ie: US immigration officer at the port of entry) and you would only need to file a single petition to cover both engagements.

____________________________________________________________________

For additional information and resources on this and other legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ftmartslaw-pc.com.

To ask your own question, write to:
lawanddisorder@musicalamerica.org.

All questions on any topic related to legal and business issues will be welcome. However, please post only general questions or hypotheticals. FTM Arts Law reserves the right to alter, edit or, amend questions to focus on specific issues or to avoid names, circumstances, or any information that could be used to identify or embarrass a specific individual or organization. All questions will be posted anonymously.

__________________________________________________________________

THE OFFICIAL DISCLAIMER:

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!

The purpose of this blog is to provide general advice and guidance, not legal advice. Please consult with an attorney familiar with your specific circumstances, facts, challenges, medications, psychiatric disorders, past-lives, karmic debt, and anything else that may impact your situation before drawing any conclusions, deciding upon a course of action, sending a nasty email, filing a lawsuit, or doing anything rash!

 

Tags:, , , , , ,
Posted in Artist Management, Law and Disorder: Performing Arts Division, Touring, Visas | Comments Closed

The Truth About Industry Standards

Wednesday, March 21st, 2012

By Brian Taylor Goldstein

Dear FTM Arts Law:

I was recently reviewing a contract I received from an agent. When I asked for some changes, she told me that her contract was “industry standard” and that nothing could be changed because that’s the way everyone does it. In the future, I don’t want to waste anyone’s time or appear like I don’t know what I’m doing. Are there industry standards for certain types of contracts? Where can I learn what is and is not legally required?

Do not mistake “industry standard” for “legally required.” Something which is “legally required” is mandated by statutes or regulations—such as visas, taxes, licenses, or permits. The term “industry standard”, on the other hand, usually means: “This is how I’m used to doing it and I’d rather not change.” Too often, its employed as a form of peer pressure to make you feel that you have no right to make counterproposals, counter offers, or suggest a new or different way to structure the deal or transaction. Nothing could be further from the truth! The only industry standards in this industry are that there are NO standards! This is not to suggest that there are not ways to structure some deals and transactions that are more common than others, but even a common practice or custom does not mean that it is unchangeable. More significantly, if you polled a cross section of performing arts professionals about any given topic, you will find a significant divergence of opinion as to what is and what is not “standard”. In other words, just because someone has done something a certain way for 20 years does not mean that’s the way everyone else must do it, much less you. It may be “standard” for that individual or organization, but it doesn’t make it “standard” for anyone else.

In your question, you don’t mention the specific terms that were at issue. Depending on the circumstances, what you were asking for may have been completely reasonable or completely ridiculous. But that really doesn’t matter. Perhaps more than in any other industry, the arts is based on relationships and success depends on the health and strength of those relationships. When entering into any arts-based relationship, you should always feel free to ask questions, propose new ways of doing things, and think creatively. This does not mean you will get what you want. That will depend on negotiations and the negotiating positions of the parties. If you need to licensing rights from another party or want to work with them more than they want to work with you, its to be expected that they may counter any or all of your proposals with “take it or leave it.” However, that’s not because of any predetermined “industry standard”, its just that they may be in a better position than you are to dictate the terms they want. That’s not necessarily unfair, its just reality. In response to an attorney who once presented me with a contract which he insisted was “industry standard”, I told him that, according to his “standard”, the artist gets screwed, so we need to pick a better standard. It never hurts to ask!

___________________________________________________________________________

For additional information and resources on this and other legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ftmartslaw-pc.com.

To ask your own question, write to lawanddisorder@musicalamerica.org.

All questions on any topic related to legal and business issues will be welcome. However, please post only general questions or hypotheticals. FTM Arts Law reserves the right to alter, edit or, amend questions to focus on specific issues or to avoid names, circumstances, or any information that could be used to identify or embarrass a specific individual or organization. All questions will be posted anonymously.

____________________________________________________________________________

THE OFFICIAL DISCLAIMER:

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!

The purpose of this blog is to provide general advice and guidance, not legal advice. Please consult with an attorney familiar with your specific circumstances, facts, challenges, medications, psychiatric disorders, past-lives, karmic debt, and anything else that may impact your situation before drawing any conclusions, deciding upon a course of action, sending a nasty email, filing a lawsuit, or doing anything rash!

 

Tags:, , , , ,
Posted in Artist Management, Arts Management, Contracts, Law and Disorder: Performing Arts Division | Comments Closed

Newer Entries »