Archive for September 21st, 2010

A Day in the Life

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

by Alan Gilbert

I am not going to introduce this blog with a portentous statement about what it means to be a music director today. This isn’t going to be a philosophical platform. Rather, I think that people might be interested in going behind the scenes, to know what I imagine many would find to be an unexpected range of items that cross my desk as music director. The job requires what I think is an unusual attention to a range of issues. It’s not just a question of having the skill to deal with the issues – you have to see which areas actually are “areas,” because you can’t deal with something until you understand that it has to be dealt with. I am looking forward to sharing random, perhaps even haphazard, musings on the great variety of topics that I have the pleasure and, it turns out, the surprise of addressing in the regular course of my work as the New York Philharmonic’s 25th music director.

To kick things off I thought I might simply list what I accomplished – or tried to accomplish – in one specific day. Here is a partial summary of my agenda on Friday, September 17, the last day of the last week before the opening of my second season with this orchestra:

After dropping my son off at pre-Kindergarten, I …

  • • spoke with Larry Tarlow, the Principal Librarian, asking him when I could expect the final installment of Wynton Marsalis’s revision of his piece that we are performing on Opening Night (September 22),
  • • studied Dutilleux’s Métaboles (which I am conducting on the first subscription program of the season) for about 45 minutes, and
  • • had a conversation with Eric Latzky, our V.P. of Communications, in preparation for a wrap-up of the Ligeti Grand Macabre project we performed last May, for a video taping later in the day for the League-formerly-known-as-ASOL.
  • • Then I went and did the taping, which was an hour and a half in which I and others discussed Grand Macabre for what the League is using as an educational tool to help orchestras understand why we did such a project, how we approached it, what made it such a success, what we learned about doing this kind of project in general, and what we learned about how we function as an institution approaching such a new area.
  • • Afterward I had a business lunch that involved discussions about our tour to Europe in October.
  • • When I came back, I found the revised score for Wynton’s piece on my desk, and checked with the library to see how different it was from the last version I’d received.
  • • I flipped through the score as I scrambled to prepare for a meeting I was going to have with Wynton later in the day.
  • • I spent time with David Snead, our V.P. of Marketing, talking about how we are going to promote Kraft, an ambitious work by Magnus Lindberg that we will be performing in early October.
  • • Then I sat down with Monica Parks, our Director of Publications, to talk over ideas for this blog.

I’ll stop this recitation here, even before my meeting with Wynton, and only say that when I was in high school and first imagined what the Music Director of the New York Philharmonic would do, it never in my wildest dreams occurred to me that it wasn’t just studying the music and showing up for rehearsals and concerts. I would love to be able to spend three hours, if not more, immersed in studying a score, and it is very rare that I can do so, and there can be frustration when it’s impossible to carry something through to its logical conclusion. I am not complaining about the seeming interruptions and distractions. I feel lucky to have a job that calls on different capacities and is never boring – not for one second – and I find all the items that cross my agenda engaging, challenging, and fascinating. And I certainly would never say or assume that any or all of these details are more compelling than those that arise during your own work day; I just feel that they are idiosyncratically connected with being a music director in an American orchestra operating at the beginning of the 21st century, so I hope that they might be of interest to you.

See you soon … I’ve got to read my kids a bedtime story.

(For more information on Alan Gilbert and the New York Philharmonic, visit nyphil.org.)

 

P.T. Barnum Move Over

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

“To the greatest dancers on earth,” said New York City Ballet’s Master in Chief Peter Martins. On September 14 the Danish-born master of ceremonies pronounced this while making his annual, launch-the-season vodka toast. I don’t think Martins knew that his grand words echoed those of America’s most influential circus impresario. P.T. Barnum’s “greatest show on earth” began with elephants and trapeze girls walking the ring of the circus floor. On opening night, Martins trotted out “the greatest dancers on earth” one at a time in front of the stage curtain in Barnum-like fashion. As they stood in a line and in an array of costumes (jeans to suits, cocktail dresses to tutus), they looked like kids on their first day of school. Only Gonzalo Garcia bowed with a flourish of the arms as though saying, “The show must go on!”

Unprecedented in City Ballet history, Martins is putting his principal dancers front and center. He is shaking up the House of Balanchine’s historic mission, which has placed greater value on its choreography. Martins’s approach comes in concert with a new marketing campaign that aims to humanize the dancers through images where they are shot casually, candidly, or sexily (as opposed to formally in performance and in costume). These images can be seen in New York’s subway, magazines, and on billboards. They are also hanging along the public walls of the David H. Koch Theater. Marketing dancers’ personalities in consumer venues is one thing. It’s another matter to do it in the theater, where (until now) there appeared documentary style pictures of the company’s evolution or examples of a designer’s work, which helped to contextualize the complex, collaborative process of making ballets. Clearly, City Ballet is evolving.

What thankfully remains the same is the high quality of much of the choreography. Jerome Robbins’s 1979 Four Seasons, which closed the program and is a satire, remains a lesson in choreographic nuance. Funny is hard to do, and Robbins Seasons echoes the earlier Monty Python television series, but without disrespecting ballet’s demands on the body and the mind. Nonetheless, Robbins’s gestural gimmickry in Seasons pokes fun at ballet’s allegorical propensities: The corps dancers of Winter shiver and hug themselves; the women of Summer are pelvic-tilting harem girls; the dancers of Fall caper and rush, resembling leaves whistling down boulevards. During Tuesday’s performance, the dancers equaled Robbins’s choreography. Erica Pereira rose on pointe with a snowflake’s ease. Jennifer Ringer’s ability to use her whole body expressively demonstrates her hard-earned artistic maturity. Rebecca Krohn’s elegantly Mannerist lines and sexy confidence perfectly fits her role as the queen of Summer.

The other two dances on the program were Balanchine’s Serenade (1935) and Martins’s Grazioso (2007). Though it’s been said Serenade is an abstract dance, I see it as autobiography. It was the first ballet Balanchine made in America. Created to Tchaikovsky’s Serenade for Strings, the second section tells the choreographer’s story: A woman (Janie Taylor) emerges from the wings behind a man (Ask Le Cour); she covers his eyes with her hand; he walks forward like a blind missionary and encounters three dancers; he shapes them with his hands like a sculptor. At the ballet’s end, one of these muses (the inestimable Sara Mearns) transforms into a Madonna figure: Mearns is lifted above three porters heads like a Russian icon during a processional. As she exits the stage, she arches her back as though offering herself to her creator. What’s this? It is a highly emotional statement about redemption through artwork. In Serenade Balanchine demonstrates his faith in ballet’s expressive (spiritual) capacity. As the blind man who learns to see through his dancers, he implies he has the vision to develop ballet in the New World.

As for Martins’s Grazioso, it bears resemblance to late 19th century descriptions of the Russian Imperial Ballet, whose lengthy productions featured an endless array of divertissements that had no thematic connection to each other. They did, however, serve to show off each soloist’s technical strengths. Tricks abounded, and some dancers performed with the humanity of carnival barkers. Like these divertissements, Grazioso aims at lightness and virtuosity. What surprises is Martins choice of taking the least laudable aspects of Russian ballet and imitating it. The costumes by Holly Hines don’t help matters. Think Commedia dell’Arte meets a Las Vegas nightclub. Despite the choreographic and design deficiencies, Ashley Bouder, Gonzalo Garcia, Daniel Ulbricht and Andrew Veyette performed their hearts out. Mine goes out to them for their valiant efforts.