Archive for November 17th, 2011

Tchaicoughsky at Carnegie

Thursday, November 17th, 2011

by Sedgwick Clark

One would have cough thought it a TB ward in February. But, no, it was Carnegie Hall’s opening cough night in October. Yo-Yo Ma’s pianississimos in Tchaikovsky’s Andante cough cough cantabile took the breath away from the non-coughers at Carnegie Hall’s opening night (10/5). Too bad the coughers couldn’t hold their breaths because they missed some truly ravishing playing by the Mariinsky Orchestra under Valery Gergiev as well.

Traditionally, Russian orchestras have been praised for their excitement but rarely for refinement. My previous concert encounters with the frequently under-rehearsed Mariinsky had left me unprepared for its virtuosic ensemble, perfect sectional balances, and sheer tonal luxuriousness. Not a coarse bar to be heard in this welcome Tchaikovsky festival. Even the cymbal player avoided shattering ears, eliciting striking color and shimmer from his dangerous instrument.

The festival included Tchaikovsky’s six numbered symphonies, Rococo Variations with Ma, and the First Piano Concerto with the latest Tchaikovsky Competition winner, 20-year-old Daniil Trifonov, who emphasized melodic detail over structural rigor, caressing the keys with generous, colorful tone; Gergiev’s accompaniment never overbalanced him. Of the Tchaikovsky symphonies I heard, Nos. 3 and 4 favored luminous sonority and plush attacks over searing intensity.

Scheherazade and Shostakovich’s First Symphony were festival interlopers. The Rimsky used to turn up each season, but it’s played relatively rarely these days. Gergiev was content to revel in the score’s sensuous glories, especially in a seductively broad third-movement, but the finale’s turbulent shipwreck fell short of Witold Rowicki and the Warsaw Philharmonic’s memorable maelstrom at Carnegie in January 1974. The Shostakovich, which in lesser hands can fall apart structurally, turned out to be my favorite of Gergiev’s performances. The second-movement scherzo, especially, was thrillingly precise.

I have to go back to November 1973 at Carnegie for the most unforgettable Tchaikovsky performance I’ve ever heard: a hair-raising Francesca da Rimini during several concerts of Russian music with the Leningrad (now St. Petersburg) Philharmonic under Gennady Rozhdestvensky. (Fairness report: In 2005 Gergiev and Mariinsky played a helluva Francesca in Carnegie too.) Also on that series was the fastest Glinka Ruslan and Lyudmilla Overture one could possibly imagine, with every hemidemisemiquaver astonishingly in place, and Tchaik’s Fifth. In my mind’s eye I can still see the timpanist marking the march tempo of the finale’s coda, showily brandishing his sticks in the air as the music strode to its triumphant conclusion. Whatever happened to such joy and flair in music-making?

The unique character and commitment of the Mravinsky-trained Leningraders was simply overwhelming. No orchestra today matches that style of playing—certainly not the current internationalized version that now exists under the St. Petersburg name—and I doubt we’ll hear its like ever again. Get the electrifying Deutsche Grammophon recordings made in London on tour in 1960 of Rozhdestvensky in Francesca and Mravinsky in the last three Tchaikovsky symphonies. Imagine the intensity level ratcheted up tenfold, and you’ll have an idea of what I heard that evening.

Anecdote time: The fall in 1973 when the Leningrad played, I had a brief stint with the firm handling Carnegie Hall’s p.r., and I was involved in a Times photo shoot of Rozhdestvensky for a feature in Arts & Leisure. One of my colleagues offered the conductor a comb before the photo was taken. He ran the tines over his bald pate, smiled broadly, and said, “It’s for my brains.”

Haitink at the Phil

Bernard Haitink led the New York Philharmonic last week for the first time since 1978. Zachary Woolfe spent three-quarters of his Times review castigating the orchestra for its conservative programming this season, exemplified by Haitink’s selection of Richard Strauss’s Don Quixote and Beethoven’s “Pastorale” Symphony. Zack is correct about the overall programming, but the trend is epidemic throughout the world’s orchestras, even in San Francisco, if they wish to stay in business.  He was also correct in judging the performances to be “eloquent” and “enjoyable.” I heard the Tuesday performance (11/15) and particularly warmed to the performances of the orchestra’s Principal Cellist Carter Brey and Principal Violist Cynthia Phelps in the Strauss.

But, to come full circle, I bring up this concert to point out that the audience was uncommonly quiet and respectful, which I expect at Carnegie but not at Lincoln Center. I’ve not been to a Tuesday concert at the Philharmonic in years, choosing to attend on Thursday nights despite the noisier audience. The orchestra players seemed relaxed and enjoying themselves. It showed in their music-making.

Haitink, who was Musical America’s Musician of the Year in 2007, leads more standard repertory for the second of his two programs with the Phil this season: Haydn’s “Miracle” Symphony and Bruckner’s Seventh. Let’s hope he is invited back soon.

Looking Forward

My week’s scheduled concerts:

11/18 Avery Fisher Hall. New York Philharmonic/Bernard Haitink. Haydn: Symphony No. 96 (“Miracle”). Bruckner: Symphony No. 7.  (Also 11/19.)

11/19 Carnegie Hall. Baltimore Symphony/Marin Alsop; Caroline Dhavernas, Speaker (Joan of Arc); Ronald Guttman, Speaker (Brother Dominic); other soloists; various choruses. Honegger: Joan of Arc at the Stake.

Playing for Free

Thursday, November 17th, 2011

By: Edna Landau

To ask a question, please write Ask Edna.

Dear Edna:

I am in my last year of an undergraduate program at a conservatory in the U.S. where I have formed a string quartet with fellow students. We have only been playing together for less than a year but we have hopes to stay together after graduation. Meanwhile, our biggest challenge is to find places to perform. There are churches and even one or two art galleries in the area where we believe we could give concerts but we would not receive a fee. This doesn’t particularly bother us but we have been advised that we should never play for free. Do you agree with this approach?—Michael B.

Dear Michael:

While I understand that whoever advised you wanted to ensure that your group would not be taken for granted, it is common for ensembles who are just starting out to occasionally play for free in order to build up a fan base and gain performing experience. Performing for a public that is not familiar with you, as opposed to school where the audience is composed of friends and teachers, is a valuable and essential experience. You have to give a little extra to connect with such an audience and their reaction will be true and unbiased. These types of concerts provide important opportunities to run through repertoire that you wish to polish and maybe even perform at a competition. Whenever you play a free concert, be sure to ask the venue whether they have a mailing list to whom they might send an announcement of your concert.  You will also want to have a sign in book somewhere near the entrance that encourages members of the audience to join your mailing list by submitting their e-mail address. Should you wish to encourage voluntary donations, you can put a basket and sign next to the book. You might also want to put a sentence in your program to the effect that you are grateful to each member of the audience for coming and should they wish to support your group with a voluntary donation, it would be greatly appreciated. You might accompany this with an invitation to come backstage to meet all of you following the concert. The key point is that playing a free concert doesn’t seem like an imposition when it affords you opportunities to get the name of your quartet known and maybe even to generate some publicity. The venue that is hosting you may have some connections to the press and might be able to get some advance coverage of your upcoming appearance. While this type of performance is unlikely to be reviewed, it is possible that you or the venue know some bloggers who write about arts events and would be willing to come and share their reactions on their blog. If the venue is willing to allow you to make a video of your concert, and assuming you can do so without undertaking a major financial commitment, this could be a real plus, especially if you are lacking any exposure on YouTube. Finally, be sure to take the time to invite any people who might prove useful to you in the future and who will spread the word in the arts community about your group and its potential for a promising future. Once you consider all of these possible benefits to be gained from one concert, playing for free doesn’t seem at all like a compromise.

I would love to have YOUR question! Please write Ask Edna.

© Edna Landau 2011