Archive for May, 2012

Soloist, Collaborator or Both?

Thursday, May 3rd, 2012

By: Edna Landau

To ask a question, please write Ask Edna.

Dear Edna:

I am a pianist finishing my first of two years in a graduate program at an American conservatory. I received my undergraduate degree at the same conservatory. Over the years, I was fortunate to have been frequently sought out as a collaborative artist for recitals with singers and instrumentalists. While I have always greatly enjoyed filling this role, I still dream of the possibility of having a solo career. It is very helpful for me to have the income from this work but if I continue along this path, will I rule out that possibility altogether? –Brian W.

Dear Brian:

Since you have told me that you are often approached by your peers to collaborate with them, I assume that you excel in this area. Happily, these are times when most artists feel comfortable wearing a variety of musical hats and moving back and forth between solo appearances and collaborations, especially when opportunities present themselves to work with inspiring colleagues. Two days ago, I had the pleasure of listening to a wonderful young pianist, Michael Brown, perform a recital program with the captivating violinist, Elena Urioste. Within the previous three weeks, he had played two solo recitals in New York (with largely different programs). From what I heard and read, all three were beautifully prepared and imbued with equal enthusiasm. The truth is that you don’t need to categorize yourself and make an either/or choice, at least for now. Every career has elements of the unexpected. You may decide to play a recital with a singer and it could turn out that a manager attending the recital is so drawn to your playing that they make a point of finding out more about you. A variation of this happened early in my IMG Artists days when Charles Hamlen and I attended a recital given by one of our clients, soprano Lucy Shelton. The program featured this wonderfully versatile artist in a variety of repertoire, including Schubert’s “The Shepherd on the Rock”, with guest artist David Shifrin on clarinet. After just a few measures of his playing, we glanced at one another with total rapture and knew that we would soon be adding a clarinetist to our management roster, challenging as it was to take on a solo wind player. The important message here is that any time you set foot on stage in any capacity, it is an opportunity to be noticed.

I think it would be advisable for you to take advantage of your upcoming year at school to seek candid advice from your teacher, as well as others who know your playing, with regard to their assessment of your potential for a solo career. Keep in mind that it is difficult and time-consuming to secure solo engagements on your own or to attract the attention of a manager. As long as the collaborations are bringing in a steady income, I see no reason to give them up. If you like, you can keep your feet in both camps by entering a few competitions, if you feel prepared and motivated to do so (but I would advise against appearing as both collaborator and soloist in the same competition, even if you think it’s cool!). To get a balanced view, you might also want to consider enrolling in a collaborative piano program, such as the one offered by The Music Academy of the West. It might afford you a broader framework in which to establish your priorities, as well as opportunities to interact with a new group of performers and teachers who could lend additional perspective. Once you leave school, you might truly need to decide what your primary focus should be. Opportunities to collaborate with other musicians may be less frequent, unless you cultivate your connections and get the word out that this is a priority for you. If you are fortunate to perform with partners whose careers are on the rise, you may find great fulfillment in concerts in major cities where you might even attract positive critical attention. We are fortunate to have many superb collaborations captured on recordings, among them pianist Samuel Sanders with Itzhak Perlman and Martin Katz with Marilyn Horne. Both of these pianists gained great recognition through these partnerships and, undoubtedly, so much more.  In a wonderful YouTube video, Martin Katz relates how he grew as an artist through his association with Ms. Horne and how her standards became his standards. If he ever harbored aspirations of becoming a soloist, I doubt that he felt let down by his ultimate decision.

To ask a question, please write Ask Edna.

© Edna Landau 2012

Resounding Crumbs; Ruggles on CD

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012

by Sedgwick Clark

We hear entirely too little of George Crumb’s music in New York. On 4/19 Leon Botstein and the American Symphony Orchestra stepped into the breach with crackerjack performances of the American composer’s early Variazioni (1959, but not premiered until 1965) and Star-Child (1977), played with power and sonority, especially by Crumb’s beloved array of exotic percussion. In between came Echoes of Time and the River (Echoes II), Crumb’s 1968 Pulitzer Prize winner and a Botstein favorite.

The first piece—a partly 12-tone work that reveals his student infatuation with Berg’s Lyric Suite and Violin Concerto and Bartók’s MUSPAC, among others, along with clear evidence of the Crumb to come—deserves frequent hearing, as does the more fancifully astronomical Star-Child. The sheer size and virtuosity of the latter’s forces obviously mitigates against performance, but Botstein and the expanded ASO—“including soprano, solo trombone, children’s choir, a male speaking choir that also plays hand-bells, organ, and enlarged sections that include six horns, seven trumpets, and eight percussionists,” writes annotator Robert Carl—were up to Crumb’s demands in the resounding acoustic of Carnegie.

Echoes of Time and the River was more problematic. Crumb requires members of the orchestra to march across the stage and down into the parquet aisles in a precisely executed processional, all the while chanting and, at the end, whistling. In the program booklet, Botstein recalls his undergrad days as assistant conductor and concertmaster of the University of Chicago orchestra in 1967 and observing a rehearsal of the Chicago Symphony premiere of the piece in which the players refused to do the processionals. When Seiji Ozawa led the Boston Symphony in Echoes at Carnegie in February 1976, the players looked mortified. I don’t recall how the BSO audience reacted, but the ASO’s audience laughed. Perhaps some preparatory words from the podium before the downbeat might have helped, but the players lacked any semblance of ritualistic evocativeness in either pace or expression (the women stomped resoundingly across the stage in hard heels). Perhaps a screening of the Shangri-la scenes of Lost Horizon might have provided behavioral insight. But at least the “Procession Coordinator” should have insisted on rubber-soled shoes. As for the musical performance, Echoes required a more sensitive hand than Botstein’s presentational manner.

Shaham in New Jersey

Gil Shaham playing the Berg Violin Concerto and a thoughtful program capped off by one of my favorite Prokofiev symphonies, the Third, enticed me to Newark’s NJPAC on 4/27. New Jersey Symphony’s music director, Jacques Lacombe, puts together interesting repertoire, and the orchestra is a fine one. They will be playing works by Varèse, Weill, and Busoni next week, 5/9, at Carnegie’s Spring for Music. Don’t miss it.

Shaham’s performance of the Berg concerto, unlike those of most virtuoso violinists, actually honored the composer’s muted dynamic scheme. This is a very quiet piece—almost chamber music—and Lacombe was with him all the way. At times one wished for a larger body of strings (playing quietly, of course) to support the pianissimos, but the orchestra’s level of artistry was evident throughout. Shaham also played the world premiere of Richard Danielpour’s Kaddish for Violin and Orchestra, a lovely, affecting expansion for strings and harp of a sextet he composed after his father’s death in 1977. It deserves wide performance.

Prokofiev’s Third Symphony (1929) uses themes from his opera The Fiery Angel. It’s loud, dissonant, aggressive, and the New Jersey performance was too well behaved and underpowered for the optimum effect I’ve heard in concert from Philadelphia/Muti and Chailly with the New York Philharmonic and Concertgebouw. Still, there were many beauties to enjoy in the quiet second movement and serpentine third.

All of Ruggles on CD at Last!

Hard on the heels of Michael Tilson Thomas’s American Mavericks tour with the San Francisco Symphony, MTT’s long unavailable recording of the complete works of Carl Ruggles is on CD at last. American music devotees have the new-music organization Other Minds (www.otherminds.org) to thank for stepping in gloriously where Sony Classical had feared to tread.

I remember Columbia’s mid-seventies press conference to announce its new recording contract with Tilson Thomas. With irrepressible enthusiasm, he announced that his initial projects would be complete cycles of Ruggles and the French composer Pérotin (12th c.-13th c.), whose music has influenced minimalism. Nothing came of the latter, but the Ruggles project was recorded between 1975 and 1978 and released in 1980 to rave reviews. The orchestral works were played by the Buffalo Philharmonic, of which MTT was music director (1971-79) and getting impressive results in concert and on record. Such artists as soprano Judith Blegen, trumpeter Gerard Schwarz, Speculum Musicae, the Gregg Smith Singers, and pianist John Kirkpatrick, a friend and champion of both Ruggles and Ives, were enlisted for the chamber works. It was a class act and is unlikely to be duplicated.

Other Minds has prepared a model reissue. Most importantly, the master source material of original producer Steven Epstein’s recordings frees us at last from listening to the abominably pressed CBS LPs. The handsomely designed CD booklet, adorned with Thomas Hart Benton’s portrait of Ruggles composing at the piano, reprints the LP notes by Tilson Thomas and Kirkpatrick and adds a 1946 essay about Ruggles by Lou Harrison.

No one interested in American music should hesitate to buy this CD set.

Looking forward

My week’s scheduled concerts:

5/3 Metropolitan Opera, 6 p.m. Wagner: Götterdämmerung. Fabio Luisi (cond.). Katarina Dalayman, soprano; Wendy Bryn Harmer, soprano; Karen Cargill, mezzo; Jay Hunter Morris, tenor; Iain Paterson, bass-baritone; Eric Owens, bass-baritone; Hans-Peter König, bass.

5/7 Carnegie Hall, 7:30. “Spring for Music.” Houston Symphony/Hans Graf. Shostakovich: Anti-Formalist Rayok; Symphony No. 11 (“The Year 1905”).

5/9 Carnegie Hall, 7:30. “Spring for Music.” New Jersey Symphony/Jacques Lacombe; Hila Plitmann, soprano; Marc-André Hamelin, piano; Men of the Westminster Symphonic Choir. Varèse: Nocturnal. Weill: Symphony No. 1 (“Berliner Symphony”). Busoni: Piano Concerto.

Generic Forms: A Prescription For Trouble

Tuesday, May 1st, 2012

By Brian Taylor Goldstein

HELLO –

How can an organization that presents music programs, and puts some of them on the Internet, find a good general release form for artists/speakers to sign?

The tricky part about forms is not finding them, but choosing which one is right. There are lots of sources for good general release forms—the Internet, formbooks, colleagues, etc. We provide a list of formbooks that we recommend on our website www.ftmartslaw-pc.com. However, to select the right form, you need to know what you need.

A “release” is just another word for “permission”, and, like all other contracts, it memorializes an agreement between two parties. So, in order to know what form you need, you need to know what permissions you need and what permission the other party is willing to grant. For example, if you are presenting a music program and you want a form through which a musician will give you the right to record their performance and place it on the internet, you will want a form that addresses the following issues: (1) Is the musician expecting to get an extra fee in exchange for granting permission?(2) Do you want to place the entire performance on the Internet, or just excerpts?(3) Will you be posting the performing on your own website or on other websites such as YouTube?(4) Can you leave the recording up indefinitely, or will the musician be able to tell you to take it down? (5) If there is more than one musician performing, such as a band or ensemble, will you require a release from each performer or does one person have the right to grant permission on behalf of everyone else? and, perhaps most importantly, (6) Is the musician performing his or her own music? Remember: unless the musician is also performing music he or she wrote themselves, they cannot give you permission to record it. You will need to get that permission from the composer as well as from the musicians.

There is no “generic” permission form or release that will apply to everyone in every situation. Any form or any contract is only “good” if it addresses all of the elements of your specific circumstances and successfully communicates the understanding between the parties and covers all of the necessary. It may not surprise you to learn how often I have been contacted by someone who found what they believed was a “generic” form, filled in the blanks, and found out too late that it didn’t give them the rights or permissions they needed for their specific circumstances. So, when it comes to forms, don’t go for the generic…go for the prescription you need. Before you go hunting around for the right form, first figure out what you need, then start reading and editing forms and until you get the one that fits just right.

________________________________________________________________

For additional information and resources on this and other legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ftmartslaw-pc.com.

To ask your own question, write to lawanddisorder@musicalamerica.org.

All questions on any topic related to legal and business issues will be welcome. However, please post only general questions or hypotheticals. FTM Arts Law reserves the right to alter, edit or, amend questions to focus on specific issues or to avoid names, circumstances, or any information that could be used to identify or embarrass a specific individual or organization. All questions will be posted anonymously.

__________________________________________________________________

THE OFFICIAL DISCLAIMER:

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!

The purpose of this blog is to provide general advice and guidance, not legal advice. Please consult with an attorney familiar with your specific circumstances, facts, challenges, medications, psychiatric disorders, past-lives, karmic debt, and anything else that may impact your situation before drawing any conclusions, deciding upon a course of action, sending a nasty email, filing a lawsuit, or doing anything rash!