By popular demand, I offer another baker’s dozen of Africa photos to tide over a humid summer. Our last two weeks of May were in South Africa’s fall season—very dry, with Kruger National Park’s brown grass sparsely green only near the river. The jungle foliage may have desiccated, but the bare bush gave us a better view of animals that, even then, blended into the background to an uncanny degree. In the morning the temps were around 40° Fahrenheit, and we dressed in five layers and bundled under blankets as the Land Rover whisked us to the bush to observe the changing of the wildlife guard. By 9 a.m. several layers had been shed, and at midday it was nearly 80°. Our late-afternoon return to the bush required that we dress in retrograde. The unexpected benefit of the season was that bugs were near nonexistent. Usually a magnet for their stingers, I didn’t get a single bite.
Photos: Sedge and Peggy Kane.
Once again, thanks to Stephanie Challener for her assistance in posting these photos.
Sunrise. The terrain is dotted with dead trees, stark and dramatic in the African sky. Peggy and our intrepid travel companions, Peter Clark and Jonathan Rosenbloom, would sigh in feigned frustration at my continued requests to stop the truck for a photo, but even Peter began snapping them after a while.
Our first day on safari began uneventfully. And then, as we turned a corner, there was a giraffe staring at us interlopers. We stopped. He stared. And when we stayed still he lumbered past us impatiently.
Look at those teeth! I was perfectly happy to let the camera do the close-up for this shot of a baboon demanding space for his family.
The most curvaceous horns in the jungle belong to the nyala antelope.
Talk about self confidence. This momma leopard allowed us to invade her territory without a flicker of concern. Of course she was well acquainted with the Land Rover and the respect of its inhabitants, but a foolish visitor might still be tempted to interpret her relaxed aplomb as an invitation. Not a good idea!
Mother elephant and child lunching in the bush. We were close up in this photo, but in many we took from afar we could barely distinguish the animals from their surroundings.
Who-o-o-o.
Tracking a leopard at night. We were on our way back to Lion Sands when, like a flash, a bush buck dashed across the road from the left, pursued immediately by a young leopard. We could hear a skirmish, but the buck got away and the leopard returned to the road, where our tracker pinpointed the cat in the spotlight. Our ever-competitive driver, Kyle, followed him into the bush, and we bumped and jostled in pursuit around the pitch black environs for nearly half an hour before returning to the camp.
Don’t tread on me. One of the Big 5 (a category of mammals most desired by hunters, including the lion, leopard, elephant, and rhino), the African buffalo is a very aggressive and dangerous animal, not to be messed with.
Not one of the Big 5 is the hippopotamus, perhaps due to its ungainly weight. This smiling hippo appears far happier in the cool water than did his grumpy, out-of-water sibling in last week’s photos.
A mountain goat oversees the perimeter at a goat cheese farm.
Only photos from the air could possibly capture the awesome immensity of Victoria Falls’ Seven Wonders of the World status. My photos were too close: It looked like merely another water fall. But Peter took a shot from the back yard of the Victoria Falls Hotel, where we stayed, and the cloud-like mist billowing in the distance suggests the falls’ wide-range power. Photo: Peter Clark.
It used to be thought that African elephants could not be trained. In fact, reported Robert Osborne last week when TCM showed all the Weissmuller-O’Sullivan Tarzan films in one day, MGM used the more docile Indian elephants, which have smaller ears, and attached fake, large ears to them! But the Elephant Back Safari program gives the lie to that old canard, for here’s Coco, with genuine ears flared, as Sedge and Peggy make friends with her before riding her. If you care to see us in Coco’s saddle, check out the photo in my May 30 blog, “Bwana Clark.”
Can Newspapers Charge To Quote Reviews??
Wednesday, August 8th, 2012By Brian Taylor Goldstein
Dear Law & Disorder:
I recently came across the website of an artist management agency in Europe where they had posted the following: “The press review is temporarily not available. German newspapers Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and Süddeutsche Zeitung recently started to pursue institutions and artists using texts (press reviews, interviews, commentaries etc.) published by those newspapers on their websites or in any other commercial context without having paid for them. We have been advised to remove all press quotations from our website as the same phenomenon seems to happen in other countries like Switzerland and Austria.” Is this a copyright trend that will spread to other European countries and the USA? Will agents, and artists have to start paying for the use of (press reviews, interviews, commentaries) used to promote an artists career? Also, if an American agency has press reviews, interviews, commentaries from Europeans newspapers on their websites, such as from the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and Süddeutsche Zeitung, will these agencies be liable for payment of the use for this information, as well, as it is being used in a commercial context? (Thank you for your column on Musical America, and I also thank Ms. Challener for her leadership in including such information in the weekly email Musical America updates.)
Newspapers and magazines have always owned the exclusive rights to the articles, reviews, editorials, and interviews they publish. Just like you can’t make copies of sheet music, CDs, books, and other copyrighted materials, you cannot make copies of articles and reviews and re-post them without the owner’s permission. Even if you are not “re-selling” an article or review, anything that is used to promote, advertise, or sell a product or service (ie: an artist!) is a “commercial” use.” While “quoting” or “excerpting” a positive review is most often considered a limited “fair use”, making copies of the entire article or review is not. While it should go without saying, you also cannot “edit” or revise articles and reviews in an effort to make a bad review sound more positive. (That’s not only copyright infringement, but violates a number of other laws as well!)
The website you encountered was in response to certain German newspapers, in particular, who began making significant efforts to require anyone who wanted to copy or quote their articles or reviews to pay a licensing fee. In the United States, for the most part, most newspapers and magazines have not actively pursued agents or managers who have quoted articles and reviews on their websites to promote their artists. However, I am aware of managers and agents who have been contacted by certain publications where entire articles have been copied and made available for download. In such cases, the publication has demanded that the copy either be licensed or removed. I also know of agents and managers who have posted unlicensed images on their websites and then been contacted by the photographers demanding licensing fees.
As for the ability of an American agent to quote or copy articles from the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and Süddeutsche Zeitung, under the applicable international copyright treaties, they could require American agents to pay as well. While I don’t necessarily see this becoming a trend among US publications, its certainly worthwhile to reflect that anytime an agent, manager, or presenter uses images, articles, videos, other materials to promote an artist or performance, there are copyright and licensing considerations that need to be taken into consideration.
________________________________________________________________
For additional information and resources on this and other
legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ggartslaw.com
To ask your own question, write to lawanddisorder@musicalamerica.org.
All questions on any topic related to legal and business issues will be welcome. However, please post only general questions or hypotheticals. GG Arts Law reserves the right to alter, edit or, amend questions to focus on specific issues or to avoid names, circumstances, or any information that could be used to identify or embarrass a specific individual or organization. All questions will be posted anonymously.
__________________________________________________________________
THE OFFICIAL DISCLAIMER:
THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!
The purpose of this blog is to provide general advice and guidance, not legal advice. Please consult with an attorney familiar with your specific circumstances, facts, challenges, medications, psychiatric disorders, past-lives, karmic debt, and anything else that may impact your situation before drawing any conclusions, deciding upon a course of action, sending a nasty email, filing a lawsuit, or doing anything rash!
Tags:agent, artist, Brian Taylor, cannot make copies, commentaries, commercial context, copy, copyright, copyright infringement, european countries, Goldstein, license, Licensing, manager, permission, photograph, quotations
Posted in Artist Management, Arts Management, Copyrights, Law and Disorder: Performing Arts Division, Licensing | Comments Closed