Archive for November, 2012

Järvi and Jansen with the DSO Berlin; The Knights play Beethoven on Sony Classical

Friday, November 2nd, 2012

By Rebecca Schmid
The Deutsches Symphonie-Orchester Berlin is off to a fine start this season, having gained Tugan Sokhiev as music director after an interim period senza maestro following Ingo Metzmacher’s departure in 2010. On Wednesday, Paavo Järvi and the violinist Janine Jansen joined the orchestra together for the first time in a performance of Bruch’s Violin Concerto at the Philharmonie. The only work by this German composer to have entered the canon is also his first violin concerto, an original assimilation of the devotion to Mendelssohn and Schumann which he would never relinquish despite the growing influence of the New German School in his time.

Jansen, a regular fixture in the Philharmonie-based chamber series Spectrum Concerts before entering the international spotlight, imbued improvisatory moments of lyricism in the opening movement with unselfconscious passion. While the climbing runs of the inner Adagio verged on the muscular, her seamless, chamber-like communication with the orchestra and its full-bodied strings, in much better form than last season, made for a satiating performance. The account grew in intensity for the last movement as Jansen’s visceral playing found an ideal outlet in Bruch’s fierce harmonics. Her liveliness carried directly over to the orchestra in fortissimo passages which Järvi harnessed without force. As an encore, Jansen offered a soulful account of a Bach Partita, finding the right balance between introspection and sentimentality.

The opening performance of Nielsen’s First Symphony, which leans heavily on Beethoven for structural and motivic inspiration, proved less gripping. While the tension brewing in the simple harmonies of the inner Andante emerged nicely through the DSO’s chiselled strings, the climatic harmonic changes of the third movement could have been plumbed to greater effect. The orchestra also did not shine in hard-edged attacks and at times wobbly woodwinds of the first Allegro movement. Järvi’s good humored presence kept the energy high through moments of Nordic grandeur, and the orchestra found its stride in the winding melodies of the final movement.

Closing the evening was Hindemith’s Symphonic Metamorphoses on Themes by Carl Maria von Weber, a dance commission premiered by the New York Philharmonic in 1944 and choreographed for City Ballet under Balanchine eight years later. The modernist setting of Romantic melodies found inspiration in Stravinsky’s neo-classical Pulcinella, which makes itself especially apparent in the cheeky low woodwinds of the second Turandot movement. The DSO’s direct, spirited playing served the music well in its stern but free polyphonic invention, culminating in a sardonic march.

The Knights’ latest Release…

The clichéd notion of Beethoven an uplifting force for humanity seems a strange fit for the Knights, an orchestra of young freelancers whose flexible format and dramaturgically innovative programming provide a promising alternative in today’s climate of stalled bureaucratic dealings and gloomy discussions about attracting new audiences. The ensemble’s most recent independent album, A Second of Silence, released earlier this year on Ancalagon LLC, interweaves Satie, Glass, Feldman and Schubert. Meanwhile, the Knights also teamed up with cellist and Dresden Music Festival Intendant Jan Vogler for an all-Beethoven “prelude to the 2012/13 season,” out on Sony Classical since September 28. The orchestra, which has mostly stayed close to U.S. territory, has collaborated with Vogler on several occasions since winning his attention four years ago—performing a Beethoven symphony. “I was struck immediately by the fresh and innovative interpretation, but also by the musicians’ treatment of each other, by the ideals of a true communality which hold this orchestra together,” he writes in liner notes.

The album takes what the press release describes as “two contrastive compositions,” the Triple Concerto and the Fifth Symphony. Both were written within the same four-year period, published respectively in 1807 and 1809—the year Napoleon proclaimed himself emperor—but, as concert master and Knights co-founder Colin Jacobsen points out, show the composer in two very different moods. Beethoven’s Fifth may be one of the most hackneyed symphonic works today, having emerged alongside the Ninth as musical specimens able to redeem mankind from the horrors of world war, yet it is easy to understand Vogler’s coup de foudre. Eric Jacobsen leads the orchestra with a lightness that evokes an embrace of life as much as a struggle of man against fate. By contrast, even Leonard Bernstein and the New York Philharmonic, documented on Sony Classical Great Performances, seem weighed down by the forces of history.

The Knights’ unusually fleet articulation of the iconic four-note motive in the opening movement and evasion of bombast in the final Allegro propel the music away from ruminations about tortured genius and into a realm in which the joy of music-making triumphs, even if it at times skims over the surface of “the tremendous inner battle” Bernstein saw in this manuscript. The orchestra nevertheless captures an introspective quality, such as in the dance-like inner Andante, breathing together like a chamber ensemble, and infusing the piece with renewed vitality. The Triple Concerto, featuring solo parts for violin, cello and piano, similarly sheds a cloak of nostalgia for restraint and buoyancy, creating exciting suspense in what Jacobsen rightly identifies as an “operatic sense of drama” in the opening bars and moving through French-inspired rhythms with grace. The violinist’s solos are sweet and unassuming in the inner Largo, never too majestic, echoed sensitively by pianist Antti Siirala and Vogler’s lamenting cello. The recording gives a balanced account of the instruments’ interactions, a further argument in favour of adding yet another Beethoven album to the shelf.

rebeccaschmid.info

Carnegie’s Crane

Friday, November 2nd, 2012

by Sedgwick Clark

Hurricane Sandy left a humbling amount of destruction in its wake, including a breath-catching sight in midtown Manhattan: a construction crane dangling 1,000 feet above West 57th Street, just east of Seventh Avenue, across from Carnegie Hall. Traffic was cordoned off between Sixth and Eighth avenues on 55th through 58th streets, bringing Carnegie concerts to a halt until the crane is brought down. It was initially thought that the street could be reopened when the crane was secured to the scaffolding, but second thoughts determined that the whole kit and caboodle—crane, cab, and 90-story scaffolding—would have to come down and then be replaced for utmost safety.

How long the replacement would take varied in several reports. But on Thursday, November 1, protests by consulates of international hotel guests and pleas from apartment residents within the restricted area grew to the extent that they were allowed to enter their rooms briefly for selected belongings and pets, accompanied by the police, according to a report in Bloomberg Businessweek. This indicates a long haul at the very least, which will change the status of concert appearances this season by many favorite artists on Carnegie’s stages.

For a time the hall was optimistically announcing the cancellation of concerts day by day, but late on Thursday it e-mailed a press release covering concerts through November 5. Among 11 concerts rescheduled, cancelled, or moved to alternative venues, Murray Perahia’s annual New York recital, scheduled for 11/2, was handily moved to Avery Fisher Hall on Sunday, 11/4, at 7:30. But the Belcea Quartet’s first of three Beethoven quartet concerts on Saturday, 11/3, in Zankel Hall was rescheduled for Tuesday, 11/6, “pending the reopening of West 57th Street in Manhattan”—most likely wishful thinking under the circumstances.

Ticketholders were encouraged to check carnegiehall.org for the most up-to-date information. 

Free Mozart from the New Jersey Symphony

I wonder if New Jersey Governor Chris Christie likes classical music? He has displayed such a statesmanlike profile in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy that nothing would surprise me from now on. His state’s fine orchestra, the New Jersey Symphony, has just announced that this weekend’s all-Mozart concerts at the State Theatre in New Brunswick on 11/3 at 8 p.m. and at NJPAC in Newark on 11/4 at 3 p.m. will be open to the public at no charge on a first-come, first-served basis. Works on the program are the Violin Concerto No. 3, Symphony No. 29, and Sinfonia Concertante, K. 364. Augustin Dumay is violinist and conductor; Frank Foerster is violist.

Another Yannick Angle        

I’ve always enjoyed others’ opinions whether I agree with them or not. As it happens, George Loomis and I largely agreed about Yannick Nézet-Séguin’s Verdi Requiem with the Philadelphia Orchestra at Carnegie Hall. When I e-mailed George to say how much I had liked his review (Musicalamerica.com, 10/26), he replied: “I don’t think I’ve ever been to a Verdi Req where the focus was so much on the orchestra.” Perhaps that’s one reason I liked the performance so much (Musicalamerica.com, 10/24). I have admitted before that vocalism is not my strong suit, but it certainly is (one of) George’s, which is why anyone interested in the arts should read as many different opinions as possible.

George concluded his review with a good point I had forgotten: that Yannick had held up his arms to silence applause when the last note of the “Libera me” died out—but for too long, and one could sense the audience champing at the bit to register its approval. It was pretentious. Giannandrea Noseda got it just right last fall at Lincoln Center after his devastating performance of Britten’s War Requiem: about 20 seconds.

Botstein Overreaches

Music Director Leon Botstein’s celebration of the American Symphony Orchestra’s 50th anniversary was typically ambitious—two monumental works identified with Leopold Stokowski, founder of the ASO: Charles Ives’s Symphony No. 4 and Gustav Mahler’s Symphony No. 8 (“The Symphony of a Thousand”), with Stoki’s 1969 arrangement of The Star-Spangled Banner thrown in as an opener. Ticket prices matched 1965’s: $1 to $7.

Three of the Ives Fourth’s movements had been performed previously—Nos. 1 and 2 conducted by Eugene Goossens in 1927 and No. 3 by Bernard Herrmann in 1933—but Stokowski’s was the premiere of the complete, four-movement work (1910-25), on April 26, 1965. Coincidentally, one of the 83-year-old maestro’s assistant conductors for the Ives premiere—José Serebrier (the other was David Katz)—was downstairs in Carnegie’s Zankel Hall leading the American Composers Orchestra in Ives’s Third Symphony and other works. I had planned on attending the ACO but, alas, I heard about the Botstein concert the morning of the concert and was able to get a ticket.

The Ives is still a rarity these days, with the complex rhythmic layering of its second and fourth movements still requiring considerable virtuosity. I’ve heard Boulez/New York Phil, Ozawa/BSO, and Dohnányi/Cleveland of the Fourth in concert; the first and third of these had much to offer technically but were hardly idiomatic. The Stoki and Serebrier recordings remain superior. It was announced on Bernstein/Philharmonic programs in the Sixties and Eighties but to my knowledge was never performed. Botstein’s performance was surprisingly accomplished technically, but it was emotionally unsympathetic, especially the lovely third-movement Andante moderato, and devoid of the folkloristic American elements that Stoki unearths in the busy second movement. It was also awfully fast—27 minutes; six minutes faster than the timing listed in the program.

Stokowski led the American premiere of Mahler’s Eighth in 1916 with the Philadelphia Orchestra and gave it a notable reading in 1949 with the New York Philharmonic, preserved on several sources, including a historical broadcast set of the symphonies released by the orchestra, which, incidentally, I produced. The Eighth is an extraordinarily difficult piece to unify and was neither memorably played, sung, or conducted. Imagine, Maestro, if you had given the rehearsal time you took for the Ives and applied it to Mahler’s gargantuan symphony. You could have worked to honor the composer’s pianissimo directions. Loud portions, such as the end of the first movement, might have been more than a chaotic noise. You might not have had to stop twice in the second movement’s instrumental introduction, and more than that, you might have had time to invest it with some meaning.

A Dance That Still Strikes The Heart: Martha Graham’s Chronicle:

Thursday, November 1st, 2012

Note: This review marks the continuation of a series dedicated to showcasing the best student writing from the Dance History class I teach at The Juilliard School.

By Michael Marquez

Martha Graham’s Chronicle speaks against the rise of fascism, but it also reveals a universal message. Everyone should fight for causes. On September 30 at New York City Center, The Martha Graham Dance Company’s performance of Graham’s 1936 masterwork concluded the second program of the Fall for Dance Festival.

Blakeley White-McGuire. Photo by Michele Ballantini

Chronicle opens with a lone figure. Wearing a long, heavy black skirt and sitting on a round-shaped platform, Blakely White-McGuire manipulates yards of her costume. Her skirt becomes a psychological extension of her being. It looks like the psychic weight she carries. It invites fascination. When she unfolds the skirt’s red underside, it is as though she is shedding her own blood. While White-McGuire’s focus is captivating and fearless, her full-bodied gestures show her fight.

In the second section, “Steps in the Street,” nine dancers step, jump and twist as one. On the dark-lit stage, with its black floor and cyclorama, Wallingford Riegger’s music drives the performers into a primordial state. Their impassioned dancing looks like it is being spun from their inner impulses. They dig deep into the ground, rooting them selves to the stage to form archaic and statuary-like shapes.

Photo by Michele Ballantini

The strong and vigorous women fight humanely, instead of devolving into immorally behaving creatures. Unfortunately, too many of the dancers’ transitions lack suppleness. Or, as master Graham teacher Terese Capucilli puts it, their transitions lack “thickness.”

Nonetheless, Chronicle shows how much emotion is inside of us. We should never ignore what we feel. We should never forget that it’s necessary to fight for causes. A vanguard artist of the last century, Graham made essential dances. Chronicle is one of Graham’s works that continues to strike at the human heart.

Michael Marquez is a second year student in the Dance Division. He studies the Graham technique with Terese Capucilli.

The Power of a Program

Thursday, November 1st, 2012

By: Edna Landau

To ask a question, please write Ask Edna.

On Monday, October 15, while reading the Arts section of The New York Times, I was struck by the fact that more than half of one page was taken up by two reviews of concerts that had very small audiences and that were performed by artists without major name recognition. Anthony Tommasini reviewed a performance by the Mivos Quartet at the DiMenna Center’s Benzaquen Hall, where he reported that chairs were set up for just 50 people. The review of the quartet was accompanied by a performance photo which measured 6 x 9 inches.  Vivien Schweitzer reviewed a concert by the Danish String Quartet in the Victor Borge Hall of Scandinavia House, which has a seating capacity of 168. I can well remember a time when only concerts performed in New York’s biggest halls, or debut concerts performed in one or two venues, stood a chance of being reviewed.

It would seem that it matters far less where today’s performers share their music with us than what they choose to program. I find this change wonderfully refreshing and welcome. The Mivos Quartet’s program, which Mr. Tommasini called “thoughtful”, consisted of Helmut Lachenmann’s String Quartet No. 3 (“Grido,” 2002), Wolfgang Rihm’s “Quartettstudie” (2004) and John Cage’s String Quartet in Four Parts (1950). The Danish String Quartet performed Beethoven’s String Quartet in A minor (Op. 132), which Ms. Schweitzer called “one of the most powerful performances of Opus 132 I’ve heard live or on disc.” The rest of the program consisted of Hugo Wolf’s “Italian Serenade” and Janacek’s String Quartet No. 1 (“Kreutzer”). Ms. Schweitzer’s quote and very enthusiastic review will undoubtedly be beneficial to the quartet as they continue to build their career and it will not matter at all that they didn’t play in one of New York City’s premier concert halls.

While pondering this topic, I decided to call my esteemed colleague, the preeminent publicist Mary Lou Falcone, to see if she thought that my observation was accurate. Ms. Falcone is one of the founding directors of Spring for Music, a festival that has brought orchestras to New York’s Carnegie Hall in May of the past two years, chosen solely by the distinctiveness and adventurousness of their programs.  Ms. Falcone also teaches a Vocal Arts Seminar at the Juilliard School in which she stresses the increasing importance of connecting with one’s audience through thoughtful programming and direct personal communication. She concurred with my observation and we shared our excitement at the thought that in choosing from a broader and more imaginative variety of venues, artists need not concern themselves so much with the chances for media coverage. A call to Welz Kauffman, President and CEO of the Ravinia Festival, confirmed that in Chicago, even tiny venues may be covered by the press, especially if new work is involved or the venue is unusual and interesting. I know for a fact that Mark Swed, Chief Music Critic for the Los Angeles Times (who visited my class while I was teaching at the Colburn School), has long been drawn to concerts with unusual programs in interesting venues. Clearly, the entire country is moving in the same direction.

While it is likely that concert presenters may still be reluctant to present a large number of concerts in small, intimate venues, due to their legitimate concern about box office income and covering their expenses, it is heartening to note that they still may opt for them if they feel they are most appropriate for a particular program. Earlier this week, The New York Times featured the Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center’s “Cozy Celebration of Britten’s Centenary” which took place in the Rose Rehearsal Studio at Lincoln Center. The Escher Quartet’s fascinating and interconnected program of works by Britten, Beethoven, Purcell and Gesualdo (arranged for the ensemble by the quartet’s violist) was enjoyed by a small audience seated in circles around the quartet – close enough, said Wu Han, one of the Society’s artistic directors “to breathe in the rosin dust released from the performers’ bows and to become participants in the music making.” How wonderful that the Society opted for the Rehearsal Studio, rather than the much larger Alice Tully Hall.

Can performers conclude that they no longer have to contemplate raising a huge sum of money to rent one of the most prestigious concert halls in hopes of gaining attention? This might be true, but only if they do not lose sight of the importance of offering a program that will be distinctive and enlightening. It does not need to be a program of all-contemporary music, but it might be especially attractive if the pieces relate to one another in some way. It is always a plus to introduce a new or relatively unknown work to an audience, or even to offer an interesting transcription that speaks to the artists’ strengths. The performers should feel that they have something very special to say about the music and they should have lived with it and performed it sufficient times to thoroughly share their passion for the music with their audience. The crowning touch will be to choose a venue that will allow them to accomplish this in the most direct way, so that their audience can get swept up by their excitement and cherish the experience long after the concert is over.

To ask a question, please write Ask Edna.

© Edna Landau 2012