Passing It On: Thank you Elizabeth Kauffman

October 29th, 2010

or
A brief history of cultural word of mouth in China

by Cathy Barbash

Way back around 2000, during one of my fact-finding trips to Beijing, I asked then Cultural Affairs Officer Elizabeth Kauffman what was new and interesting in town. She said she’d heard of a relatively new independent modern dance troupe, and gave me some leads on how to find them.

I tracked the troupe down in a rehearsal space in the Middle School of the Beijing Opera Academy in the Fengtai section of Beijing (think Shabby Outer Boroughs), where a sypathetic colleague was allowing them to use space. The only performance they were giving during my visit was during the Coca Cola MTV China Awards, but I could tell they were terrific. In those days, and still somewhat today, they and other independent performing arts groups would do “industrials” to earn their payrolls.

I talked them up, eventually found a way to get an agent over to see them. She signed them, gave them their American debut tour, and suddenly, as the cultural industry in China finally felt the benefits of Reform and Opening Up, even though they were independent, they became the darlings of the Ministry, often touring with Chinese officials.

Jump to last December, when David Fraher and I took a delegation of the Major University Presenters to China to look for work to tour through their circuit. As we co-curated the offerings (a first, since we were guests of the Ministry of Culture), the troupe was of course included. The Bureau of American and Oceanian Affairs at the Ministry is now young, energetic and much more savvy. Guess which dance company they took visiting Lincoln Center President Reynold Levy to see during his recent visit?

P.S. Levy gave an elegant, sensitive, humble, respectful, passionate and engaging speech at the National Centre for the Performing Arts in Beijing (aka The Egg) last Friday. Just had lunch with my colleagues at the Shanghai Grand Theatre and they were similarly impressed with him earlier in his visit. He is the perfect cultural ambassador.

Deep Purple

October 28th, 2010

By James Jorden

Few operatic experiences—indeed few human experiences—exist or, nonexistent, emerge from the imagination, that cannot be described with a quotation from that most definitive of all diva novels, Mawrdew Czgowchwz by James McCourt. And so it is with the career (or should one say the life?) of the Regie fancier. Read the rest of this entry »

Dance Happenings in NYC

October 27th, 2010

By Rachel Straus

On October 18 the New York Dance and Performance Awards (otherwise known as the Bessies) reprised their ceremony, following a two-year hiatus. Among the 2009 award winners was Kyle Abraham for his full-length work The Radio Show. Musical America featured Abraham in June 2010 as the “New Artist of the Month:”

http://www.musicalamerica.com/news/newsstory.cfm?archived=0&storyID=22933&categoryID=2

 

• If you are in New York City later this week and want to see the painterly choreography of Chinese dance artist Mr. Wei and his ten-year-old group Shen Wei Dance Company, you can do so for free. The company will be performing excerpts from RE-(III) all around Manhattan. Here is the schedule:

Thursday, October 28:

10am, 12pm & 9pm Duffy Square in Times Square

11am 42nd Street Subway

3pm Around Grand Central Station

7pm Union Square

Friday, October 29:

11am Columbia University

12:30pm Wall Street

2:30pm Battery Park

4:30pm The Metropolitan Museum

7:30 DUMBO

For more information go to:

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=106720379394156&ref=mf

 

• Today I’m writing about the late, great choreographer Talley Beatty (c. 1918-1995). The story will be published in the February 2011 issue of Dance Teacher magazine. Beatty’s Tres Cantos (1975) will be revived by Ballet Hispanico and presented at the Joyce Theater  (November 30-December 12). To get a sense of Beatty’s beauty check out Maya Deren’s 1945 A Study in Choreography for Camera:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTX2LKDXn3o.

To understand his artistic impact on the Civil Rights era, check out his masterwork Mourner’s Bench, as performed by Jerome Stigler of the Dayton Contemporary Dance Company:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKxytimwUT4

 

On Tour(ing)

October 26th, 2010

By Alan Gilbert

We are in Ljubljana, the second stop on our European tour. It should have been the third country, but what would have been the Orchestra’s first trip to the Republic of Georgia was cancelled abruptly a few weeks ago by the presenters – that is to say, by the government of Georgia. I have not heard a convincing justification for this, and my friend Lisa Batiashvili, the brilliant Georgian violinist who was to have been the soloist in the planned concerts, and who was instrumental, in every way, in paving the way for our putative visit, is baffled as well. She is also embarrassed, and deeply disappointed that her efforts to bring the New York Philharmonic to her home country ended so sadly. I know from speaking with her of her love of her country, and how much she would like to help shape and enrich its musical life. Who knows now when those noble impulses will be able to come to fruition?
 
Since the Philharmonic had some unexpected extra days in New York City, we were able to add a non-subscription concert to our schedule. It was extremely fortunate that Pinchas Zukerman was available to give another performance of the Brahms Violin Concerto, which he played with us the week before. Since we were rehearsing the Academic Festival Overture for the tour, we were able to create an all-Brahms program that was filled out by the Fourth Symphony (another tour piece). Non-subscription concerts have to be sold from the ground up, obviously, and this one was only announced two weeks before it happened. It was therefore especially exciting that the concert sold out, and there was a real sense of event in the hall that evening. The Orchestra played unbelievably, and those of us onstage felt a palpable connection with the audience, who responded with real warmth. It was a great send-off for our tour.

The first concert of the tour happened on Sunday, in Belgrade. We were the closing event of Bemus, a two-week-long festival the city hosts. We played in the enormous Sava Center (seating capacity close to 4,000!), which was literally packed to the rafters. The previous night I had had dinner with U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Serbia Mary Burce Warlick and some of her staff, and they told us that they had never heard of the hall being sold out, explaining that usually the upper section is not even opened. And this, when the ticket prices were apparently 20 times what concerts tend to cost in Belgrade! It appears that there was a kind of frenzied excitement surrounding the orchestra’s visit. Part of this may have been the fact that it was actually a return visit: Leonard Bernstein brought the Philharmonic to Belgrade on the legendary round-the-world tour of 1959. One of the presenters made us a gift of an original program book and ticket stub from that concert – items that will be treasured additions to the Philharmonic Archives.
 
Sunday’s concert itself was a big success, and it felt appropriate to be able to play Bernstein’s “Lonely Town” as an encore. There was a sigh of recognition from the audience when I announced the piece – a sign of a connection between an American orchestra and an audience that would have been practically unimaginable five years ago, and absolutely impossible only ten years ago. It was a good feeling.

(For more information on Alan Gilbert and the New York Philharmonic, visit nyphil.org.)

Beyond the Bathrobe

October 22nd, 2010

By James Jorden

It’s the laziest of journalistic tropes to lead off with “this guy I know says…” but in this case the guy in question has provided me with what I consider a really handy peg for a first column on opera stage direction. Anyway, this guy—who’s in his 70s now, a retired opera record pirate, but, more to the point, one of the survivors from the 1950s golden age of the Met standing room line—he’s got a “line” expression for just about every operatic experience imaginable.   Read the rest of this entry »

Postcard from Beijing

October 21st, 2010

by Cathy Barbash

I’m back in China for the first time since May, and once again caught in between the impulse to blog all the cultural gossip, or hold back because divulging the news would incur the wrath of the large organizations that are in play, limiting my future access. But after a day spent with old friends at the Ministry of Culture, the National Centre for the Performing Arts, and the U.S. Embassy, there was news aplenty.

I can say that the cultural industry reforms of the past Five Year Plan will continue and deepen into the next, with many formerly well-funded and evidently complacent arts organizations complaining bitterly that the withdrawal of government subsidies is too sudden and too deep. (Have they been asleep the past five years? Or smug enough to think they were too well-connected for it to happen to them?) And the Ministry of Culture, cognizant that some art forms and their relevant ensembles will need the support in order to survive in an ever more globalized China, continues to agonize over which organizations will be so annointed. And the sensational team at the U.S. Embassy is planning a fascinating, unusual and creative concoction of activities for next year.

The other noticeable change is that the Ministry and other large arts organizations have taken seriously the government’s insistence that they look abroad for both business and business advice. One of the biggest entities will send large delegations to intern with one of America’s biggest arts organizations later this month. Today, one of America’s top arts executives (but no, not a usual suspect), will address a group of cultural officials at the National Centre for the Performing Arts on “Leading a Cultural Organization in the 21st Century.” Delegations organized by the Ministry of Culture just returned from an extended American trip which included a week’s seminar on the Broadway business. Yet at the same time it is still necessary for performances in most venues to receive official Ministry of Culture approval. When that ceases, we’ll know that change has truly arrived

Fall for Dance Festival: Program 4

October 12th, 2010

By Rachel Straus

Larry Keigwin’s imagination is as unbound as an attention deficit disorder diagnosed savant. The retro electric pop band Fischerspooner and the drag queen entertainer Murray Hill have sought out his choreographic range. The Martha Graham Dance Company and the New York City Ballet Choreographic Institute commissioned him to make unconventional dances. The Radio City Rockettes employed him as an associate choreographer to shake things up.

On October 6 at City Center, The 38-year-old choreographer’s Megalopolis opened the Fall for Dance Festival’s Program 4 with a Pow! Keigwin’s 2009 work immediately channeled the haughty absurdity of Chris Rock in his infamous role as an interstellar-drag queen-DJ in the movie Fifth Element. Fritz Masten’s silver spacesuit costumes and the dancers’ extroverted antics—pelvic lassoing and Vogueing—screamed Halloween rave party. Keigwin’s work trafficked not in high art.

With 18 performers culled from Keigwin + Company and the Juilliard School’s senior class, Megalopolis upended any semblance of seriousness attached with concert dance. To Steve Reich’s Sextet/Six Marimbas and to excerpts from MIA’s World Town and XR2, Keigwin’s satiric dance referenced a dizzying array of places and people: Martha Graham’s ubiquitous traveling steps and arrow-shaped arms, club kids on stimulants, the antic roar of modern urban life, and nightclub dance floors where the hottest movers (momentarily) rule. John Travolta’s Tony Manero of Saturday Night Fever would have been proud.

Keigwin demonstrates in Megalopolis that he has enough choreographic finesse to develop a movement vocabulary that hangs together. Time will tell whether his choreography—which presently serves to pay homage to pop culture—will get sillier or more serious.

The second work on the program was María Pagés’s Sol, which was made for the brother-daughter duo Carmen and Ángel Corella in honor of the inauguration of their Corella Ballet Castilla Y León. This Spanish ballet company, helmed by Ángel Corella, comes with backing by the Spanish government. Unsurprisingly, Sol looks less like a dance and more like an advertisement for Corella’s enterprise, which will acknowledge native Spanish dance (its music, it sensuality), will present classical and contemporary ballet (as understood by the director who made his name with American Ballet Theatre), and will warm the cockles of audience’s hearts through technical virtuosity (Corella spins like a top).

The program also featured Russell Maliphant’s Afterlight Part 1. In its U.S. premiere, the solo performed by Daniel Proietto demonstrated how tricky it is to choreograph to Eric Satie’s Gnossiennes 1-4. The fin de siècle piano composition sucks the oxygen out of any room because of its power and simplicity. In the first section of the dance, however, Maliphant came close to matching the score’s stark, still quality. Proietto slowly rotated like a dreaming dervish under a well of light care of animator Jan Urbanowski and lighting designer Michael Hulls. The work, which premiered in London in 2009, is inspired by Vaslav Nijinsky’s geometric renderings, which he began drawing obsessively as he spiraled from the heights of dance fame into mental illness. Maliphant captures through darkness, repetition, and Proietto’s sweeping wingspan a sense of sailing into an inescapable place, which in Nijinsky’s case was a sanatorium, where he lived out the rest of his days.

The last work on the program was a world premiere by Jason Samuel Smith & Friends. RHYTHMDOME hung thinly on a story (told in voice over) about a doomed future where tappers and hip hop dancers have lost the means to communicate with each other. The dance appeared equally doomed in the first 10 minutes. Then, like a patient waking from a coma, the group dropped attempts at narrative continuity and got down to the business of tapping and breaking. The revelation came when both sets of dancers riffed off of each other’s rhythms. In the last minutes, the eight dancers found common ground: The tappers “breaked” with their feet; the breakers “tapped” with their muscle fibers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arts and Krafts

October 12th, 2010

By Alan Gilbert

One thing about great art is its ability to speak to a wide spectrum of humanity, and its uncanny knack for getting people with widely differing outlooks to see what they want to see in the work. This week Kraft, Magnus Lindberg’s landmark piece from 1985, has proven itself as a great work of art, as evidenced by the power and conviction of the responses it has provoked, responses I should say that have largely left the middle ground empty. I hasten to add that the reaction has been overwhelmingly positive.

Yes, some people walked out, but the real majority stayed, and their acclamation seemed to be congratulating us not only on the performance, but on our decision to offer this piece. This was not some fringe crowd: these were our beloved subscribers. Over the weekend I was stopped numerous times on the street by people who had heard the Philharmonic perform Kraft – all of them thanked me for providing this artistic experience for New York City. On Sunday, when I was in Citarella on the Upper West Side, a white-haired woman tapped me on the shoulder and said that she had heard Friday’s concert. I admit that I half expected a complaint, but was I wrong! She said that she has been a longtime subscriber, that she loves the New York Philharmonic, and that she had never had such an exciting experience at the Philharmonic as the one that Kraft had provided. Who would have guessed? She then mentioned that she was looking forward to our performance of Brahms next Saturday. Then there was the guy who stopped me when my kids were scootering through the park, who told me how happy he was to have experienced Kraft. He said that he wasn’t sure that he cared to hear the piece again, but that he was grateful to the Philharmonic for giving him the chance to get to know the work. He went on to thank me for making this orchestra culturally relevant again. What a perfect response to the work!

I write all this not to crow about our success, but to thank people for following us on this journey of musical exploration, for understanding what we are about as an arts organization. There’s no one who loves the music of Haydn and Brahms (to name only two) more than I do, and I never get tired of conducting or listening to Beethoven symphonies. But art is not meant only to be safe and predictable: I dare say that one of the things that made Kraft thrilling for so many was the fact that they had no idea that it would speak to them as it did.

The New York Philharmonic has long been one of the world’s greatest orchestras, and my job as Music Director is to preserve and build on this legacy. This means that we will continue to play the widest range of orchestral repertoire as well as it can be played, while at the same time taking risks, striving to add to New York City’s artistic landscape in a way that places this Orchestra squarely at the center of cultural and intellectual discourse.

(For more information on Alan Gilbert and the New York Philharmonic, visit nyphil.org.)

Continuity

October 5th, 2010

By Alan Gilbert

As I have been preparing my second posting here, I read a blog that admonished me for not “feeding the beast” by posting more frequently. This was nice to read, but I admit that it made me nervous about keeping up with the regular demand of writing. Of course I am very pleased that somebody out there wants me to blog even more, but from the outset I have wanted to manage expectations about how frequently I could realistically contribute here. It will be as often as possible, but probably only every two or three weeks.

Over the last year I often found myself feeling the urge to share random thoughts about my professional life; that urge would occasionally become so strong that I had the thought of writing a book flash across my mind – but let’s not get ahead of ourselves. For now, I’ll just repeat that it was nice to read that someone was actually looking forward to hearing what I have to say; I will try to post my thoughts and experiences here as often as I can.

In fact, my schedule over the past two weeks has been, if anything, even more intense than last year’s opening. The New York Philharmonic is in an unusual situation right now, with Zarin Mehta just having announced that he’s leaving in two years. While he’s very much still in the saddle, this announcement has created a shockwave throughout the organization, and everyone is having to consider, in a very conscious way, where they stand and how they fit into the long-range plans of the organization. The process of figuring out where we will go after Zarin leaves has begun, and everybody seems truly committed to making sure that the right steps are taken.

This is an opportunity to express my appreciation for everything Zarin has done for me and for the New York Philharmonic over the years: from my first experience with the Orchestra he was a champion and a supporter, and it is largely because of him that I am here. Working with him, being able to benefit from his enormous wealth of experience, from his natural elegance, has been an education and a joy for me. In particular, I have been struck by his interest in expanding the boundaries of what we do, in using music to touch the widest possible audience, and by his heartfelt belief in the necessity of taking artistic risks. The New York Philharmonic can mean many things to many different people, and Zarin has been one of the most powerful proponents for broadening the dimensions of our artistic reach. For now, he is still very much at work here, so I do not have to express all my thoughts about his contributions and legacy at this moment; I very much look forward to working with him over the next two seasons.

In a related area, the continuity of the orchestra is constantly on my mind, as there are many vacancies at the Philharmonic. Last week we concluded a round of very successful violin auditions, which resulted in the hiring of two new musicians. It is quite rare, actually, for both of the finalists to be offered positions, but we were lucky to have two exemplary candidates who were both masters of their instruments, and also came with an artistic sensibility that I am sure will add to the musical depth of the Orchestra.

Still, during this process I thought about auditions in general: it is incredibly complicated, as it has to accomplish a lot of things. The main one, obviously, is finding the right person, but another integral outcome is the self-referential need to instill and preserve confidence in the process itself. 

I learned some lessons in Stockholm where, over the years, we had problems with the audition process. When I was Chief Conductor there was a bizarre attitude about auditions: of course the stated policy was that auditions had to be taken, but, in practice, quite a few musicians were granted positions – and ultimately given tenure – who had never played an audition. The argument internally was, “They are the right person, we need to find the right person no matter what, and that’s more important than process.” That was refreshing in a way, because in Sweden it very often can seem as though process is more important than result, but there was a palpable negative effect: people lost faith in the way we ran auditions. They asked themselves why they should audition if it was possible to win a position without undergoing this particularly stressful process. Over time the auditions became less successful simply because not enough good people were presenting themselves as candidates. In fact, we knew of people who were interested in open positions who decided not even to try since they hoped to get into the orchestra through the back door, as it were.

Holding auditions is the system we have now. It doesn’t necessarily test all the qualities that are essential to function as a consummate orchestral musician, but we are constantly trying to reevaluate it so we can create the most telling process that is possible.

That’s some of what’s been on my mind. See you next time.

(For more information on Alan Gilbert and the New York Philharmonic, visit nyphil.org.)

Defectors, barefoot mommas, masterworks, premieres, and…

October 5th, 2010

I read Alan Gilbert’s blog and it made me tired. Then I looked at my daily to-do list and realized I’m not far behind  in the work-until-I-drop life in the arts.

Here’s yesterday’s list:

• Wrote a 1000-word article for Dance Teacher magazine about the prolific career of choreographer Robert Alton (c. 1903-1957). Alton created dances for Hollywood films, like “White Christmas” (1954) and Ziegfield Follies (1945), and for Broadway, including a revival of “Pal Joey” (1952), which won him a Tony award. He was a Christian Scientist, a brilliant mimic of choreographers (particularly Martha Graham), and could, according to Agnes de Mille, create choreography “at the speed suggestive of a radio sport commentator, with a whistle between his teeth.”

• Interviewed former Dance Theater of Harlem and Boston Ballet principal Tai Jimenez. Tai will participate in a panel I’m leading at the Juilliard School on October 26 about Bronislava Nijinska’s “Les Noces” (1923). Tai said that the person who stages this masterwork to Stravinsky’s score has a grave responsibility. Dance is an oral tradition. The vitality of a work can only be passed down from performer to performer. The stager should, she says, “see her self as a shaman who passes on her wisdom.”

• Emailed former Bolshoi Ballet and New York City Ballet principal Valentina Kozlova. I asked her to vet her quotes, which I compiled from two interviews done last week. I don’t want this technical wunderkind to think I’m sloppy. Valentina recently announced her decision to hold, with Boston Ballet Artistic Director Mikko Nissinen, an international ballet competition in Boston, beginning in May 2011. Valentina defected from the Soviet Union in 1979. Today she runs a conservatory and trains less than 50 young women in the Vaganova style that has served as the foundational training technique for countless virtuoso dancers, including Mikhail Baryshnikov and Natalie Markarova. I will write a cover story on Valentina for Dance Teacher’s January 2011 issue.

• Wrote dance historian Lynn Garafola, asking whether I was on the right track in my research of Isadora Duncan. My research is for Brooklyn Academy of Music. They contracted me to write a short piece on Duncan, “the mother of modern dance,” for a new book, under the W.W. Norton imprint, in celebration of the institution’s 150 anniversary. I only have 325 words to explain why Isadora was the bomb that broke ballet’s stronghold on opera house audiences.

• Wrote a roundup review for Musical America of three “Fall for Dance” festival programs (September 29 and 30, and October 1). I decided to feature four of the 12 works presented at City Center. My review is too long, but imagine if I wrote about each dance work. I’d be up all night.