There is so much mad in choreographer Faye Driscoll

September 28th, 2010

Like Jonathan Franzen’s highly praised, recently released novel Freedom, Faye Driscoll’s There is so much mad in me craftily portrays human behavior that is as unlikable as it is recognizable. Driscoll populates her mad—which premiered last April and which was reprised by Dance Theater Workshop from September 22 to 25—with nine energetic, solipsistic, violent, sex-crazed young adults. They dance, sing, play, humiliate, rape and torture each other. Driscoll’s dark vision is leavened by her cast’s absurd antics.

On September 22, Driscoll’s 70-minute work began with Nikki Zialcita running in place while Mark Helland held her wrists behind her back. His lock impeded her forward progression downstage. Seeing her bobbing in place produced laughs. Zialcita is small and zophtic and looked under Amanda K. Ringger’s acid-colored lighting a bit like a Robert Crumb cartoon drawing. As the duet evolved in silence, Helland increasingly treated Zialcita like a plaything. Zialcita didn’t object; she squealed with pleasure as he held her throat. This frolic grew, like a glacial creep, disturbing.

The deliberate progression from light to dark and back again is what has put Driscoll on the downtown dance map (The New York Times named her previous work 837 Venice Boulevard as “one of the top five dance shows” of 2008.) Indeed, Driscoll knows how to craft an emotional arc. Her work goes somewhere. Usually it goes to the most cynical place.

In mad Driscoll demonstrates how human relationships are based in and comprised of aggression, manipulation, and victimization. In her third full-length work—structured through a series of vignettes with a Disco-esque sound design care of Brandon Wolcott—Driscoll’s theatricalized examples of human ickyness are thoroughly convincing. Adaku Utah impersonates a charismatic anger-management coach whose following is cowed and then rallied by her violent outbursts. They grow frenzied with delight. They jump up and down like cult members gone nuts. The scene was so convincing I forgot where I was. Then it turned silly through a unison aerobic dance.

Later, Driscoll created her own Abu Ghraib torture and prison abuse scene. There was nothing pat or overly theatrical about the scenario, which culminated with the Tony Orrico barking like a dog. When Orrico joined two lines of eight performers, jogging in lockstep formation like military trainees, Driscoll’s message was clear: This victim will become an aggressor; our species is heading toward its doom.

Despite this nihilistic embrace, Driscoll isn’t hanging up her hat or going the way of David Foster Wallace. After her cast took their bows, she announced the launch of a full-time company in her name. Perhaps her next work will concern the BP oil crisis, the Great Recession, and Lindsey Lohan’s troubles with the law. Being topical, Driscoll knows all too well, is titillating.

Alan Gilbert, MA Blogger

September 23rd, 2010

by Sedgwick Clark

New York Philharmonic Music Director Alan Gilbert has joined Musical America’s roster of bloggers. It’s an exciting development for us and, we hope, no less for him. If you haven’t heard yet, he filed his first blog on Tuesday and will be contributing on further Tuesdays when he can—we hope every other week or so, depending upon his schedule. His blog is called “Curiously Random,” and his first piece is entitled “A Day in the Life”—of a modern major music director, that is. Already, according to our overnight stats, his blog has been read by hundreds of people. So log on to his blog in the same column on the MA.com desktop as you log on to mine.

And speaking of schedule, as deadline for the MA Directory encroaches, back to proofreading.

Moving Forward on All Fronts

September 22nd, 2010

by Cathy Barbash

China “cultural hands” have been waiting for news of priorities in China’s next Five-Year Plan, wondering whether the sector reforms and heightened investment in cultural export would continue. The news is now in, and those of us who depend on substantial engagement, support and greater flexibility from Chinese government-related and independent cultural entities can breathe easier. On Monday, the Xinhua News Agency reported that a senior Communist Party of China (CPC) in charge of culture and publicity had publicly pledged to deepen the nation’s reform of its cultural sector over the next five years. Said Liu Yunshan, a Secretariat member of the CPC Central Committee and head of the Publicity Department of the CPC Central Committee, “More state-owned cultural institutions will be converted into enterprises as the nation builds a competition-based market for cultural products and services.” Liu spoke at what was in essence a barnstorming tour for these new reforms out in Henan Province, billed as “a workshop on a blueprint for the country’s cultural reforms and development for the “12th Five-Year Plan” (2011-2015). While assuring the crowd that the reforms would be done “in accordance with the requirements of the Scientific Outlook on Development.” (read, kosher), he stressed that “Cultural restructuring is fundamental for the emancipation of cultural productivity and the realization of cultural prosperity and development,”
Local party officials responsible for local publicity work in the provinces of Henan, Hebei, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Shandong, Guangdong, Yunnan, Shaanxi and Fujian, as well as the autonomous regions of Guangxi and Inner Mongolia, provided reinforcement and reassurance.

Moving to enable reforms on all fronts, simultaneously on Monday, a delegation of Chinese cultural officials from a variety of provinces began a week-long “how-to” seminar on Broadway theater in New York City. I’ll hope to catch up with some of them tonight at the Wen Jiabao dinner to ask what of their curriculum will be most useful to them.

P.S. Congrats to Alan Gilbert on the occasion of the New York Philharmonic’s opening night. Now that he is well-ensconced, I wonder when he will take the Orchestra back to China.

A Day in the Life

September 21st, 2010

by Alan Gilbert

I am not going to introduce this blog with a portentous statement about what it means to be a music director today. This isn’t going to be a philosophical platform. Rather, I think that people might be interested in going behind the scenes, to know what I imagine many would find to be an unexpected range of items that cross my desk as music director. The job requires what I think is an unusual attention to a range of issues. It’s not just a question of having the skill to deal with the issues – you have to see which areas actually are “areas,” because you can’t deal with something until you understand that it has to be dealt with. I am looking forward to sharing random, perhaps even haphazard, musings on the great variety of topics that I have the pleasure and, it turns out, the surprise of addressing in the regular course of my work as the New York Philharmonic’s 25th music director.

To kick things off I thought I might simply list what I accomplished – or tried to accomplish – in one specific day. Here is a partial summary of my agenda on Friday, September 17, the last day of the last week before the opening of my second season with this orchestra:

After dropping my son off at pre-Kindergarten, I …

  • • spoke with Larry Tarlow, the Principal Librarian, asking him when I could expect the final installment of Wynton Marsalis’s revision of his piece that we are performing on Opening Night (September 22),
  • • studied Dutilleux’s Métaboles (which I am conducting on the first subscription program of the season) for about 45 minutes, and
  • • had a conversation with Eric Latzky, our V.P. of Communications, in preparation for a wrap-up of the Ligeti Grand Macabre project we performed last May, for a video taping later in the day for the League-formerly-known-as-ASOL.
  • • Then I went and did the taping, which was an hour and a half in which I and others discussed Grand Macabre for what the League is using as an educational tool to help orchestras understand why we did such a project, how we approached it, what made it such a success, what we learned about doing this kind of project in general, and what we learned about how we function as an institution approaching such a new area.
  • • Afterward I had a business lunch that involved discussions about our tour to Europe in October.
  • • When I came back, I found the revised score for Wynton’s piece on my desk, and checked with the library to see how different it was from the last version I’d received.
  • • I flipped through the score as I scrambled to prepare for a meeting I was going to have with Wynton later in the day.
  • • I spent time with David Snead, our V.P. of Marketing, talking about how we are going to promote Kraft, an ambitious work by Magnus Lindberg that we will be performing in early October.
  • • Then I sat down with Monica Parks, our Director of Publications, to talk over ideas for this blog.

I’ll stop this recitation here, even before my meeting with Wynton, and only say that when I was in high school and first imagined what the Music Director of the New York Philharmonic would do, it never in my wildest dreams occurred to me that it wasn’t just studying the music and showing up for rehearsals and concerts. I would love to be able to spend three hours, if not more, immersed in studying a score, and it is very rare that I can do so, and there can be frustration when it’s impossible to carry something through to its logical conclusion. I am not complaining about the seeming interruptions and distractions. I feel lucky to have a job that calls on different capacities and is never boring – not for one second – and I find all the items that cross my agenda engaging, challenging, and fascinating. And I certainly would never say or assume that any or all of these details are more compelling than those that arise during your own work day; I just feel that they are idiosyncratically connected with being a music director in an American orchestra operating at the beginning of the 21st century, so I hope that they might be of interest to you.

See you soon … I’ve got to read my kids a bedtime story.

(For more information on Alan Gilbert and the New York Philharmonic, visit nyphil.org.)

 

P.T. Barnum Move Over

September 21st, 2010

“To the greatest dancers on earth,” said New York City Ballet’s Master in Chief Peter Martins. On September 14 the Danish-born master of ceremonies pronounced this while making his annual, launch-the-season vodka toast. I don’t think Martins knew that his grand words echoed those of America’s most influential circus impresario. P.T. Barnum’s “greatest show on earth” began with elephants and trapeze girls walking the ring of the circus floor. On opening night, Martins trotted out “the greatest dancers on earth” one at a time in front of the stage curtain in Barnum-like fashion. As they stood in a line and in an array of costumes (jeans to suits, cocktail dresses to tutus), they looked like kids on their first day of school. Only Gonzalo Garcia bowed with a flourish of the arms as though saying, “The show must go on!”

Unprecedented in City Ballet history, Martins is putting his principal dancers front and center. He is shaking up the House of Balanchine’s historic mission, which has placed greater value on its choreography. Martins’s approach comes in concert with a new marketing campaign that aims to humanize the dancers through images where they are shot casually, candidly, or sexily (as opposed to formally in performance and in costume). These images can be seen in New York’s subway, magazines, and on billboards. They are also hanging along the public walls of the David H. Koch Theater. Marketing dancers’ personalities in consumer venues is one thing. It’s another matter to do it in the theater, where (until now) there appeared documentary style pictures of the company’s evolution or examples of a designer’s work, which helped to contextualize the complex, collaborative process of making ballets. Clearly, City Ballet is evolving.

What thankfully remains the same is the high quality of much of the choreography. Jerome Robbins’s 1979 Four Seasons, which closed the program and is a satire, remains a lesson in choreographic nuance. Funny is hard to do, and Robbins Seasons echoes the earlier Monty Python television series, but without disrespecting ballet’s demands on the body and the mind. Nonetheless, Robbins’s gestural gimmickry in Seasons pokes fun at ballet’s allegorical propensities: The corps dancers of Winter shiver and hug themselves; the women of Summer are pelvic-tilting harem girls; the dancers of Fall caper and rush, resembling leaves whistling down boulevards. During Tuesday’s performance, the dancers equaled Robbins’s choreography. Erica Pereira rose on pointe with a snowflake’s ease. Jennifer Ringer’s ability to use her whole body expressively demonstrates her hard-earned artistic maturity. Rebecca Krohn’s elegantly Mannerist lines and sexy confidence perfectly fits her role as the queen of Summer.

The other two dances on the program were Balanchine’s Serenade (1935) and Martins’s Grazioso (2007). Though it’s been said Serenade is an abstract dance, I see it as autobiography. It was the first ballet Balanchine made in America. Created to Tchaikovsky’s Serenade for Strings, the second section tells the choreographer’s story: A woman (Janie Taylor) emerges from the wings behind a man (Ask Le Cour); she covers his eyes with her hand; he walks forward like a blind missionary and encounters three dancers; he shapes them with his hands like a sculptor. At the ballet’s end, one of these muses (the inestimable Sara Mearns) transforms into a Madonna figure: Mearns is lifted above three porters heads like a Russian icon during a processional. As she exits the stage, she arches her back as though offering herself to her creator. What’s this? It is a highly emotional statement about redemption through artwork. In Serenade Balanchine demonstrates his faith in ballet’s expressive (spiritual) capacity. As the blind man who learns to see through his dancers, he implies he has the vision to develop ballet in the New World.

As for Martins’s Grazioso, it bears resemblance to late 19th century descriptions of the Russian Imperial Ballet, whose lengthy productions featured an endless array of divertissements that had no thematic connection to each other. They did, however, serve to show off each soloist’s technical strengths. Tricks abounded, and some dancers performed with the humanity of carnival barkers. Like these divertissements, Grazioso aims at lightness and virtuosity. What surprises is Martins choice of taking the least laudable aspects of Russian ballet and imitating it. The costumes by Holly Hines don’t help matters. Think Commedia dell’Arte meets a Las Vegas nightclub. Despite the choreographic and design deficiencies, Ashley Bouder, Gonzalo Garcia, Daniel Ulbricht and Andrew Veyette performed their hearts out. Mine goes out to them for their valiant efforts.  

 

 

The New Season Beckons

September 16th, 2010

by Sedgwick Clark

Having avoided concerts almost completely this summer, I’m ready for the new season to start. In some ways, it’s too bad that economics has led to 52-week performance schedules. Everyone, listeners and players alike, needs a rest. Constant anything dulls the senses, and even though I missed a few events I would have liked to attend under the right circumstances—Bard College’s “Berg and His World” uppermost—there was nothing I couldn’t hear on record. I could have skipped Lincoln Center Festival’s pair of complete Varèse concerts, as the music exists in superb recordings by Pierre Boulez and Riccardo Chailly, but it should really be heard live, and the performances—by the International Contemporary Ensemble and Alan Gilbert leading the New York Philharmonic—were well worth hearing and furthermore only required my walking a block.

Gilbert will lead the first concert on my schedule in the new season, the Philharmonic’s Opening Night Gala on next Wednesday, September 22, which will also be broadcast on Live from Lincoln Center. The program features the U.S. premiere of Wynton Marsalis’s Swing Symphony (oddly, being performed only this one time), Richard Strauss’s Don Juan, and Hindemith’s Symphonic Metamorphosis of Themes by Carl Maria von Weber, a thoroughly delightful and far lighter work than its cumbersome title indicates.

The Met opens its new season on September 27 with a bang: Wagner’s Das Rheingold, the first installment of the company’s new hi-tech Ring cycle. A steady stream of articles in the Times over the summer has examined Robert Lepage’s audacious production and whether the Met stage can physically support it. Vocal lovers look forward to Bryn Terfel’s first Met Wotan and Stephanie Blythe’s Fricka (I can’t wait to hear these two megavoices face off toward the end of this season in Act II of Die Walküre, the second Ring opera). The music industry has been on tenterhooks, however: Will James Levine, who has been recovering since last spring from lower back surgery, be well enough to conduct opening night? Met representatives have been mum all summer. Rumors have it that he was leading rehearsals last week as scheduled. And just this morning a Met patron friend sent me a flyer about Levine signing copies at the Met store next Monday of two huge CD volumes of his personally selected favorite performances that the company is releasing to celebrate his 40th-anniversary season. Met reps remain mum. All fingers are crossed.

Carnegie Hall’s Opening Night Gala always feels like homecoming, undoubtedly because it has been dark all summer. At my last concert there, on May 16, Boulez conducted the MET Orchestra, so I’m really looking forward to September 29, even if it’s all Beethoven. But the Vienna Philharmonic will be playing, and these guys know their Beethoven, even if conductor Nikolaus Harnoncourt’s recordings haven’t convinced me that he is up to snuff. I’m hoping he will have loosened up for the second night’s glorious folk-nationalist cycle of tone poems by Smetana, Ma Vlast (My Homeland), since he recorded it. The last two VPO concerts will be conducted by Gustavo Dudamel, whose visits are a must with any orchestra.

Actually, the concert I look forward to the most will be in Philadelphia on October 1, when my friend Laurel E. Fay, author of Shostakovich: A Life, and I venture south to hear Charles Dutoit lead the Philadelphia Orchestra in the Soviet composer’s Fourth Symphony, preceded by British musicologist Gerard McBurney’s enlightening Beyond the Score presentation of the historical background of this unsettling work. If ever a piece of music benefited from explication, it’s this—an approximately hour-long symphony written in 1936 but not given its first performance until 1961. It signaled what appeared to be an entirely new direction for the 29-year-old composer: sort of Mahler on speed. But after the composer’s withdrawal of the symphony under pressure during rehearsals and the Stalin-inspired shuttering of his hit opera Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District, he reverted to the more popular style we know in his Fifth Symphony. Laurel and I first saw the McBurney presentation when it was done in tandem with Andrey Boreyko’s New York Philharmonic performances of the Fourth in 2007. McBurney did an encore in Chicago two years ago to accompany Bernard Haitink’s towering performances, and it is wisely included with the live recording released on the orchestra’s own label, CSO Resound. The last New York performance of the Fourth, at Lincoln Center in March by the London Philharmonic under Vladimir Jurowski, was a hair-raiser. This piece grows more compelling with each hearing.

Post-modern Dance Competition

September 14th, 2010


Seven minutes can feel like an eternity. Or at least that was my thought halfway through the second night of “Festival Twenty Ten” at Dance Theater Workshop. Now in its 16th year, the September 8-11 event featured ten pieces per night. Curated by Robin Staff, the artistic director of Dance/NOW [NYC], it gave 40 choreographers the opportunity to make concise works less than seven minutes long. Yet only three of the ten choreographers, who presented dances on September 9, rose to the occasion. And they, unlike the others, didn’t push it by going to the 6:59-minute mark.

The festival organizers also asked the audience to vote for their favorite number. Called the DanceNOW Challenge (no, I’m not kidding), this participatory process will culminate with one choreographer winning a week-long creative residency in Bucks County, Pennsylvania (the home of the festival’s artistic director), a $1000 stipend, a temporary, paid teaching position at DeSales University, and 20 hours of Manhattan rehearsal space.

Voting, however, is never what it’s cracked up to be. On Thursday night certain works received rousing hands, despite these dances ho hum choreographic and/or performed qualities. The audience, filled with friends and family, was not an impartial lot. I wonder whether the Dance/NOW people will address this papering-the-house problematic. How will the votes be weighed?

My favorite work was Throwaway. Choreographed by John Heginbotham, a Mark Morris dancer, the work wooed as it made fun of the festival’s implicit challenge: to demonstrate craft and deliver an understandable message in seven minutes. In a white bolero jacket, spandex pants, and lacy socks, Brian Lawson appeared like a 1980s suburban teen enamored with Michael Jackson. Lawson Vogued with deadpan demeanor and with the ennui of a TV channel surfer. The music by Thomas Bangalter and Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo was appropriately canned and grooveless. When Maile Okamura joined Lawson under his spotlight, complementing his gestural dis-earnestness and retro costume, Throwaway felt like a cross between Amateur Night at The Apollo and a post-modern dance purification rite.

My runner-up favorite works were A Revolution by Jim Carroll by Iain Rowe and Some Enchanted Believin’ by Maura Nguyen Donohue. But the only connection I could make with Rowe’s work and his Jim Carroll title was the costuming. Carroll, whose Basketball Diaries describes his adolescent descent into heroine and prostitution, appeared to be referenced in Rowe’s choice of a thick, black leather belt that looked vaguely punk or S&M or both. Rowe’s snippet of a solo proved mesmerizing  because he never faced the audience and he never moved. Instead his long, expressive torso and arms undulated like a flame above that black belt, or (but this is pushing it) like a soul seeking to ascend from the blackness of hell.

Donohue’s work, which closed the program, also mined the homage vein. Her spoof on South Pacific was negligible in dance terms. But as a faux musical number it included the following integrated elements: the earnest strumming of guitarist Perry Yung with the joyful vocalizations of Rick Ebihara (who also played the accordian), the marriage of ballet to pseudo Polynesian dance, and four roped-in audience members (who were lassoed at the waist). This number was and looked like a finale.

Addendum: Ellis Wood won the DanceNOW Challenge for her piece titled MOM, which was performed on September 10. The press release stated that the voters did not include the audience, but a panel of choreographers, educators, administrators, critics, and the organizer’s directors. Audience voting participation got the boot.

Outrage at B&N Demise

September 8th, 2010

by Sedgwick Clark

A number of people commented to me on my report last week on the imminent demise of the Lincoln Center branch of Barnes & Noble: from Harmonia Mundi’s René Goiffon (“How things have changed since we first met!”) to composer and record company owner David Chesky (“Apple is going to put everyone out of biz!”).

CDs were still on the horizon when René and I met.

The Apple store, with its appealing, wide-open, two-story glass façade, gets more traffic than any store in the Lincoln Center area except perhaps the largest grocery store. The building’s previous tenant, Victoria’s Secret, literally had no business being in this neighborhood, but even it had more traffic than Tower’s or B&N’s classical-record departments in their declining months—both of which joined the hapless HMV store at 72nd and Broadway in redefining the word “empty.”

A friend who lives upstairs from B&N told me that apartment owners were aghast to learn that B&N’s successor will be Century 21 clothing store. They did all they could to stop it, but to no avail. I’d like to rail at greedy landlords, but it’s our way of life that they can quadruple rents as long as people continue paying them.

So an appropriate pair of superstores for Lincoln Center attendees and Juilliard School students—a record store and a bookstore—will have been replaced by cheapo furniture (Raymour and Flanigan) and threadbare clothing. Such stores have come and gone almost as quickly as restaurants over the years. Aunt Fish was the nadir, garnering perhaps the most LOL restaurant review (from Mimi Sheraton in the Times) ever written. And just this summer, the affordable O’Neal’s and Peter’s gave up the ghost after many years of comfortable surroundings and sometimes barely edible dishes.

Time marches on.

What is Contemporary Music?

In the following piece from yesterday’s Musicalamerica.com, the canard about pop music being “contemporary” music is perpetuated. I’m sure my friend Roger Wright didn’t mean to insult the many “classical” contemporary composers whose works received their premieres at this summer’s Proms concerts.

BBC Proms Breaks Attendance Records
Attendance at this summer’s BBC Proms concerts, which opened July 16, has broken all records. Halls this year averaged at 92 per cent full compared with 87 per cent in 2009.

Among the sell-out performances were programs of Rodgers and Hammerstein, Sondheim’s 80th birthday celebration, Plácido Domingo in “Simon Boccanegra” and Bryn Terfel in “Meistersinger.”

“The incredible attendance figures are a testament to the spirit of the Proms audience, and their eagerness to embrace both core classical music and the more contemporary performances,” said Roger Wright in his comments. Wright is the director of BBC Proms and controller of BBC Radio 3.

Disaster at Lincoln Triangle

September 1st, 2010

by Sedgwick Clark

As if record and video companies didn’t have enough problems, Barnes & Noble announced on Monday (8/30) that in January, after 15 years, it would close its four-story superstore across the street from Manhattan’s Lincoln Center. The stated reason: high rents. (Surprise!) B&N will try to find a more reasonably rentable location on the Upper Westside.  

Fellow geezers still wedded to retail shopping for CDs will have no alternative than to go downtown to J&R, a store I get to only when I’m on jury duty. Living near Lincoln Center, I’ve never shopped anywhere else for DVDs. It’s the worst news for West Side book lovers since the demise of Coliseum Books, at 57th and Broadway, and the most heart-stopping event since the demise of Tower Records, across Broadway from B&N.

But, in all honesty, my household has no grounds to complain because I rarely go into B&N—I might be tempted to buy something! (I’ve got so many shrink-wrapped CDs and DVDs that it would be crazy to add to the pile.) And my wife bought a Kindle last month and can’t bear to turn the damn thing off.

A Hot Time at Lincoln Center Tonight

Continuing in its march to, uh, broaden its appeal, here’s the first paragraph from a recent Lincoln Center press release:

Starting this fall, there will be a new destination for some of the hottest DJ parties in New York, when Lincoln Center launches its new LCDJ series at the David Rubenstein Atrium.  On six consecutive weekends (October 2, 9, 15, 22, 29 and November 6), from 9 p.m. to midnight, cutting-edge DJ’s will present evenings of eclectic listening and dancing—with rhythms and beats from the heart of Brazil to indie clubs from across the East River—as the David Rubenstein Atrium is transformed into an [sic] modern lounge.  And the best part—admission is FREE!  There is no cover charge, and although drinks and refreshments will be available from ‘wichcraft, there is no minimum. 

Rafael Nadal’s Serious Side

During play-by-play on Tuesday night’s Open, talking about how Rafael Nadal is a serious guy, unlike Roger Federer who stays up late and goes to fancy bars, John McEnroe remarked, “Nadal’s a big classical-music fan: He’s seen Phantom of the Opera six times.”

Composer-friendly Pianism at Bargemusic

I haven’t been to a Bargemusic concert in several seasons, but MA.com editor Susan Elliott convinced me to take a breather from my MA Directory deadline to hear an attractive program by 32-year-old American pianist Steven Beck. A Juilliard grad, he’s a regular at Bargemusic and recently played all the Beethoven piano sonatas there.

Beck had planned to open with Stravinsky’s Three Movements from Petrushka but changed it to that composer’s Serenade in A. The 1925 work was written specifically to fit on to a pair of ten-inch 78s, with each of the Serenade’s four movements totaling approximately three minutes in length. I’ve never warmed to its dry neoclassism (Charles Rosen writes in the liner notes to his recording that it “is the most loveable, and the most original of Stravinsky’s works for piano”), and this poker-faced, rather soft-edged rendering didn’t change my mind. I’ll try again, starting with the Stravinsky and Rosen recordings.

More impressive was Schoenberg’s Suite for Piano, Op. 25. It’s the composer’s first completely 12-tone work, and Beck’s unfussy approach allowed the music to unfold naturally. Again I sensed a lack of characterization—three of the movements are dances, after all, and Schoenberg prided himself as being directly in the German tradition—but I bow to Susan, whom I discovered played the Suite when she was studying piano. She was mightily impressed!

Debussy’s Twelve Etudes filled the second half of the program, and here I felt Beck was the complete master, offering an ideal balance of color, wit, and virtuosity throughout.

P.S. The Fulton Ferry Landing, home of Bargemusic, has undergone an extraordinary transformation since my last visit. It was too close to concert time to look around, and the sun was setting, but I could see enough to know that a post-deadline visit is definitely called for.

It Was Howdy Doody Time

“Cowabunga,” Chief Thunderthud would rumble. It’s another boomer memory, vividly etched in the Peanut Gallery of our minds—far more indelible than the concerts we attended last week or the rubber-stamp movies Hollywood has been churning out for the last 30 years.

Edward Kean, the creator of the chief and his unforgettable greeting, died on August 13 at age 85. In fact, according to Say, Kids! What Time Is It?, Stephen Davis’s 1987 book about the Howdy Doody Show,  Kean wrote “almost every line spoken and every note sung” on the program, which ran from 1948 to 1956 and totaled over 2,000 episodes. It’s doubtful that anyone out in early television land knew Kean’s name (he was only a writer, after all), but what boomer doesn’t recall his inspired characters: Howdy Doody, Clarabell, Phineas T. Bluster and his flunky, Dilly Dally, Princess Summerfall Winterspring, and Flub-a-Dub? This is the first time I’ve ever seen the Princess’s name in print, and a poetic inspiration it was, too.

The Times got around to memorializing him last Thursday (8/26), and a huge chunk of my childhood was resurrected in my reading of Dennis Hevesi’s evocative obit. I, in my youth, figured that Buffalo Bob Smith was responsible for it all. Sounds like Davis’s book is another I won’t be able to put down. Maybe PK will have it on her Kindle.

Dumbing Down with New York City Ballet’s Season Brochure

August 31st, 2010

I don’t know how many of you have had the honor of receiving New York City Ballet’s season brochure. When I pulled it out of my mailbox, I briefly mistook it for a Barney’s catalogue. Then I thought Robert Mapplethorpe might have come back from the dead to focus his heated lens on City Ballet’s lithe, muscular performers. Riffling through its pages, I started to feel uneasy. Instead of featuring images of the ballets, the brochure delivers sexy, casual shots of the dancers holding each other tightly and wearing abbreviated clothes (somewhere between lingerie and rehearsal gear). Positioned alongside these black, background lit photographs are quotes from the dancers that could have been lifted from their Facebook pages.

“I can’t wait to see what [Lynne Taylor-Corbett] does with The Seven Deadly Sins,” says Jennie Somogyi. In the full-page photograph, this principal dancer wears black, silk hot pants and looks challengingly into the camera like a cover model selling underwear. Of the ten quotes from the dancers, four of them begin very much the same: “I aspire,” “I’m looking forward,” “I love,” and again, “I love.” The dancers’ thoughts about their favorite ballets are strikingly similar to a Calgon ad. “Serenade is classic! The costumes, music, and mood never get old,” says Tiler Peck. Even more dismaying is Peck’s oddly contradictory costume that comes with her promotional message. She wears a black shift, which is open at her crotch and translucent around her waist. If this is the new little black dress, I’m going back to wearing floor lengths and pastels.

So what is this all about?

Clearly City Ballet is trying to sell their season as intimate and hip. They want their dancers to feel as familiar to us as our long lost high school friends. The dancers’ quotes demonstrate how they are just regular folk who get a kick out of dancing Balanchine’s Jewels. But the brochure does something worse. It takes these talented people’s simple words and highly trained bodies and presents them together to form a compellingly stupid contradiction: City Ballet principals look as sexualized and sculptural as Mapplethorpian objets d’art; they talk just like the girls and boys of Sesame Street!

I’m deeply offended.

This brochure dumbs down City Ballet’s greatness. These dancers, no matter how hard they try, will never be average folk. The company’s repertoire isn’t merely a sexy, fun vehicle for them. The experience of watching City Ballet is more than a happy-go-lucky affair. I don’t know why dynamic images of dancers moving (let alone plucky description of dances) isn’t considered marketable.

So now I will make my City Ballet season pitch:

Please go to the tiny text and orange-colored headlines buried in this brochure. There you will find something worth looking at. City Ballet is offering 64 dances, four of which will be world premieres, this season. Among this embarrassment of riches will be ballets by George Balanchine, Jerome Robbins, Christopher Wheeldon, Peter Martins, Mauro Bigonzetti, Alexei Ratmansky, Wayne McGregor, and Benjamin Millepied. Some of the most interesting dancers working today will perform these choreographers’ ballets. They include Sara Mearns, Wendy Whelan, Theresa Reichlen, Sterling Hyltin, Andrew Veyette, and Sean Suozzi. The season begins September 14. On arrival at Lincoln Center, please feel free to check your Facebook worldview at the door. Feel free to embrace your inner elitist who is dying to experience more than the sweetly familiar or the sexually manufactured.