NORMA ABNORMAL

October 21st, 2013

by Albert Innaurato

I went to Bellini’s Norma at the Met on Friday. I was late to the party, Sondra Radvanovsky’s Norma has been praised as a throwback to greatness by many of the easily enraged hard core  — and some of these people have been seeing international performers of this huge role for 60 and more years! But just that morning, there had been the dress rehearsal for Nico Muhly’s new opera, Two Boys. For a moment it had looked as though I might go to this but I’ll have to wait and see how Muhly’s opera is received, and most importantly, whether it can be one of the baby steps crucial to whether opera can walk again.

The arts we inherited from the 19th century are dying in America. A large group of successful new works would be one prong of a survival strategy, saving opera, for example, from seeming merely bizarre. Funding is another prong. Arts are subsidized in Europe and don’t appear to be in such trouble, but the Not for Profit system in America has failed badly. All the arts are charities, all artists, beggars, and as our society gets poorer, losing its middle class, the demands on that 1 or 2 % with money to spare are enormous. Does one give to cancer research or the Metropolitan Opera, to feeding Americans or to the ballet, to desperately backward schools or the symphony? And how does anyone persuade those two or three multinational, profit besotted hydras determined to control what everyone thinks and knows to add any of the arts to multi-channel cable systems on a regular, easily accessible basis, knowing that at first, few people will watch?

But it’s easier to focus on this instant, knowing as one who is terminally ill knows, that things end, that America is a nation jammed with the uncaring, the indifferent and the stupid (sorry, I mean those with “low information”). We old timers cry: “let us sit in a circle and download the old days and if that fails, let’s hold hands and remember!”

Miss Radvanovsky is that currently rare thing, a professional singer of the highest standard for whom no excuses need be made. She has a strong technique, excellent coloratura, a very wide range with rafter shaking high notes when she wills, a glistening, easily controlled pianissimo — a very soft tone that still fills the huge opera house. She is a musician, she is tasteful. She was boring.

But can Norma, a great opera, no doubt, a high water mark of early romanticism, adored by nearly every important musician of the time, an influence on Richard Wagner (“without Bellini there would be no Wagner” he said) as well as Verdi, and Chopin and Mendelssohn and Schumann and on and on, rip our hearts out today as Bellini intended? Well, not in the sort of performance the Met gave, proficiently but unimaginatively conducted by Riccardo Frizza who evidently didn’t coach the singers in the style, or as the only native speaker in the production, get them to pay attention to their words (Bellini certainly did). Not with an Adalgisa who forced a small voice and lacked command in her difficult moments, and not with a clueless, bullish Pollione, and not with an ancient Oroveso who just stood around while his world fell apart, as indeed it does in the last scene.

Years ago (and yes, I was there years ago), Norma would have known that in the crucial moment where she decides not to sacrifice her innocent rival, Adalgisa, but to reveal herself as the villain in the eyes of her people and says simply, “son io” (“it is I” — who have betrayed you), that this was a moment to be seized for us to see the agony in this heroic woman as she fights within herself; and painfully, slowly, with profound sorrow and even fear condemns herself to death. The pain, self revelation, shame and grandeur should stop one’s heart. But Radvanovsky didn’t know how to do that, and in the whole great opera house, there was no one to tell her.

She is too accomplished and intelligent a singer to be damned with faint praise; the last twenty minutes, a massive challenge, were sung with remarkable command. But where does the instinct to perform these roles with the essential emotional commitment come from? Is a technically expert but generalized performance another symptom of how opera is dying?

Let’s hope the gifted Muhly, writing about how we live now, with singers who understand their characters implicitly, has managed a work and gets a performance that shocks and thrills and moves real people through music. And let’s hope that the remarkable Radvanovsky finds someone to stimulate her into the intense personal connection to those grand old roles that she did not have.

Alberto rages rather than babbles at http://mrsjohnclaggartssadlife.blogspot.com/

In Your Face, Astrid

October 17th, 2013

Astrid Varnay by Maurizio Anzeri

By ANDREW POWELL
Published: October 17, 2013

MUNICH — Spirograph needlemaniac defaces legendary (and conveniently deceased) Brünnhilde. And so on.

Bavarian State Opera’s anticipated additions to its portrait gallery went public yesterday, their twenty-one victims — er, honored subjects — being depicted in various media by twenty-one visual artists. Scattered docent notes:

• Anja Harteros – toner light
• Astrid Varnay – best in person
• Brigitte Fassbaender – high treason
• Christian Gerhaher – sun shines out of his … mouth
• Diana Damrau – per pietà
• Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau – cluster analysis
• Edita Gruberová – background material
• Fritz Wunderlich – for Hasselblad‎
• Hermann Prey – about to …
• Hildegard Behrens – Dietrich? Garbo? both?
• Jonas Kaufmann – David? Cellini? finished?
• Júlia Várady – ready for her close-up
• Klaus Florian Vogt – Brabant H.S.
• Kurt Moll – a wash
• Lucia Popp – monochrome Sophie
• Margaret Price – unmasked!
• Peter Seiffert – got THaT rigHt!
• René Kollo – eye, nose, mouth, eye
• Waltraud Meier – Broadway-bound
• Wolfgang Brendel – every inch the Bavarian
• Wolfgang Koch – unhappy camper

The needleman in question is Maurizio Anzeri, a London-based Italian whose stock-in-trade is embroidered photography, much of it stunning though not usually intended to depict a specific person.

Anzeri likes to cover a face, spurred on perhaps by its energy. It is unclear why, but the Freunde des Nationaltheaters München e.V. chose him to portray soprano Astrid Varnay, and he has overcome the obvious hurdle by recourse to a diptych (shown). Whether he listened to her work for inspiration or direction, or has sensed what she achieved, is anyone’s guess.

Raised in New Jersey, Varnay debuted at the Metropolitan Opera at the age of 23 singing Wagner’s Sieglinde and, days later, Brünnhilde. After successes in the 1950s at Bavaria’s Bayreuth Festival as well as at Bavarian State Opera, she settled in Munich and is buried here.

Photo © Bayerische Staatsoper

Related posts:
Portraits For a Theater
Petrenko Preps Strauss Epic
A Complete Frau, at Last
Petrenko Hosts Petrenko
Poulenc Heirs v. Staatsoper

Agents and Artists: Who Controls the Money?

October 17th, 2013

By Brian Taylor Goldstein, Esq.

Dear Law and Disorder

I am considering working with an agent, but almost every agent I speak with wants to collect my engagement fees on my behalf. Why can’t I collect my fees and just pay the agent? If an agent collects my fees, should I ask for a separate bank account? What about statements? Is it reasonable to ask for monthly accountings? When do I get paid? What’s standard?

As the artist’s representative, its quite common for an agent or manager to accept fees on behalf of an artist. Among other reasons, it allows you to focus on your performances, especially when touring, while allowing your agent to follow up on contracts, payments, and other logistical issues. However, just because a practice is “common”, that does not make it mandatory.

Should you agree to permit a representative to collect fees on you behalf, agents and managers are subject to state “agency laws” which impose certain obligations and duties. (Agency laws should not be confused with “licensing” requirements. Agency laws govern any relationship where one party acts on behalf of another and apply regardless of licensing requirements.) Pursuant to most state agency laws, when an agent or manager accepts fees on your behalf, its your money, not theirs. They must hold the money “in trust” until it can be turned over to you. As such, agents have a fiduciary obligation to treat that money separately from their own. If the parties mutually agree, the agent can deduct his or her commissions, as well as any other expenses, but the balance of the money belongs to you and the funds must never be co-mingled with the agent’s own money.

While an agent is not necessarily required to keep an artist’s money in a separate bank account, it’s a highly advisable business practice for an agent to maintain a separate trust account to hold the fees collected on behalf of all of the artists on their roster. This protects both the agent as well as the artist. For one thing, an agent is legally required to account for all money collected and held on behalf of an artist. Placing the money into a separate trust account not only makes such accountings easier, but also helps to ensure than an artist’s money doesn’t accidentally get co-mingled with the agent’s own money. For instance, when an agent collects an engagement fee, the fee should go into the agent’s trust account. If the agent is owed a commission, the agent can transfer the commission from the trust account into the agent’s personal account. This is especially important in the case of deposits. In the event an engagement is cancelled, a deposit may need to be returned. Having the money held in a separate trust account ensures that the funds are not prematurely dispensed, for which both the artist and agent could be liable.

As for whether you should demand your own, personal trust account, that’s probably overkill. Even attorneys are not required to do that. Provided the agent keeps accurate books and records, its perfectly acceptable for an agent to have a single trust account where all of the fees collected on behalf of agent’s artists are kept separate from the agent’s own business accounts. It’s then a simple matter of bookkeeping to determine which money belongs to which artist.

As for whether you should ask for monthly accountings, you should definitely ask for accountings as agents are legally required to provide them. Whether or not “monthly” is reasonable depends on the specific circumstances. If you are performing monthly, then monthly may be appropriate. Otherwise, quarterly may be more reasonable. Many agents will provide an accounting each time you are paid, as opposed to at fixed intervals.

Always remember: nothing is “standard.” Agents and managers work for you, not the other way around. You have a right to ask for whatever terms and conditions you want. Of course, that doesn’t mean they have to agree, but being able to post questions and have your concerns respected and reasonably addressed, even if you don’t get the answers you want, is key to determining whether or not to pursue an agent relationship.

___________________________________________________________________

For additional information and resources on this and other legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ggartslaw.com

To ask your own question, write to lawanddisorder@musicalamerica.org.

All questions on any topic related to legal and business issues will be welcome. However, please post only general questions or hypotheticals. GG Arts Law reserves the right to alter, edit or, amend questions to focus on specific issues or to avoid names, circumstances, or any information that could be used to identify or embarrass a specific individual or organization. All questions will be posted anonymously.

__________________________________________________________________

THE OFFICIAL DISCLAIMER:

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!

The purpose of this blog is to provide general advice and guidance, not legal advice. Please consult with an attorney familiar with your specific circumstances, facts, challenges, medications, psychiatric disorders, past-lives, karmic debt, and anything else that may impact your situation before drawing any conclusions, deciding upon a course of action, sending a nasty email, filing a lawsuit, or doing anything rash!

Who Am I? Is This the Asylum?

October 16th, 2013

by Albert Innaurato

Well, Alberto (that’s me) does babble on a lot. And that reminded me of a little known Rossini Opera, Ciro in Babilonia. Poor Ciro does have his problems, though talking too much isn’t one of them (on the other hand, in my case, …). It’s one of the happy/sad realities of a troubled time for the arts, that we can fairly easily encounter Ciro on DVD and CD; a score has been prepared that is fair to Rossini. And we can find out by reading that score, or experiencing one of the DVDs that Ciro is fascinating, phenomenally orchestrated, and full of great tunes. Ciro’s enemy even gets one of the great tenor mad scenes in opera.

That’s happy because it’s a fine opera. That’s sad because it’s not new, just unfamiliar. It’s a very old opera, in a very old style with a very old story. Art is about us, now. One shouldn’t have to be like a soldier fighting battles, to believe that arts that can’t renew themselves die.

I always wanted new sounds. When I was studying music (for eighteen years) I always wanted to know what was being created right then. And then I took a wrong turn (probably) and began to write plays. I got to Broadway and Europe and even to Asia and everything was new; my life was about my creating, and about my measuring myself against what others were creating.

It’s not that I didn’t love older plays. And I was never indifferent to the stratagems of Beethoven and Debussy and crotchety old Johann Bach. It’s just that discovery was always just as thrilling. Even if technology has given us a way of reconstructing virtually the entire past of Western music, and great masters are always being uncovered, someway has to be invented to persuade those under thirty, said to be watching three screens at once, to pay attention. And in some sense it has to be, however subtly or indirectly, about the new kind of lives they are living now.

And as for opera, well, let’s be frank, it’s a mental illness. I have it. Electroshock won’t help. But the most thrilling evenings in my life were seeing Lulu for the first time, or Nixon in China or L’amour de loin. It’s not a contest; great operas have been written from the beginning, but the remarkable new is always more thrilling than one’s fiftieth exposure to a MASTERPIECE from a fast receding past.

I have the voice sickness too… I’ll be chattering about those things. But who even knows about  much of this, really? I know I’ll be babbling to many. One thing’s for sure, I’m a tenor!! Bring on the mad scene!

Tutzing Returns to Brahms

October 16th, 2013

Löwenterrasse in Tutzing’s Schlosspark on Lake Starnberg

By ANDREW POWELL
Published: October 16, 2013

MUNICH — Some festivals strive to be on your radar twelve months of the year, with unending publicity. Others revel in a few days.

Take the annual Brahms Days in tranquil Tutzing, south of here on Lake Starnberg. Its scale is intimate, its setting gemütlich. Its focus — at least in theory — is on chamber music of the Hamburg composer, who penned his Haydn Variations and finalized his first string quartets during a long summer in the town.

At this year’s opening recital (Oct. 13), attended by state and federal dignitaries, Lena Neudauer and Florian Uhlig wove their way through violin sonatas of Beethoven, Ravel and Brahms in the Evangelische Akademie, a breezy former palace and U.S. Army HQ.

Neudauer’s confident, relaxed way with Beethoven’s E-flat Violin Sonata, Opus 12/3, emerged in burnished sound, gutsy more than sweet. Uhlig, on a small Steinway grand (perhaps a Model S), played loudly. Technically assured violin work in the Ravel Sonata in G Major (1927) — made amusing by Neudauer in its “Blues” movement and brilliantly sustained by her in its final measures — suffered again from stridency, this time on the part of both musicians.

An overlong intermission led into Joachim Raff’s syrupy reduction of Tannhäuser themes (from his Three Duos on Wagner Motifs, Opus 63), written six years after the opera. Uhlig must have discovered sensitivity during the break because now his playing took on a softer, more probing manner, and in the concluding Brahms work, the Opus 78 (1879), again in G Major, we heard a masterpiece masterfully realized.

Brahms Days programming this year has more depth than in 2012, but the festival still falls short of its potential.

Organizers plan around three Sunday evenings in the palace — with lake and Alpine views, savored by Brahms (and Eisenhower and others) — but this spacing, with funding for just five events, misses the chance to unite visitors and musicians in a vibrant and immersive exploration of the composer’s non-orchestral music.

Dilution of the schedule is matched by dilution in the programs. Tango, Brahms-based jazz (what?) and music by Heinrich von Herzogenberg (who?) have found a place in Brahms Days during the last five years. Yet of Brahms’s two dozen sonatas, trios, quartets, quintets and sextets — works of genius — only nine have been heard at the festival in the same long period. Brahms’s art-song output has fared better, with full cycles of the Magelone-Lieder, the Zigeunerlieder and the Vier ernste Gesänge. But not his keyboard music, equally suited to these events.

Checklist of the missing: the popular horn trio, all the piano trios, three sonatas, two of the three string quartets, the four luminous late collections of piano music, and dozens of songs.

Tutzing offers several venues, agreeable fall weather, a bona fide Brahms connection, and a ready audience from Munich and elsewhere. With imagination, the present runs of recital dates could evolve into a unique (and world-class) annual gathering.

Photo © Evangelische Akademie Tutzing

Related posts:
Brahms Days in Tutzing
A Stirring Evening (and Music)
Salzburg Coda
Plush Strings of Luxembourg
Kaufmann, Wife Separate

Portraits For a Theater

October 13th, 2013

National Theater in Munich

By ANDREW POWELL
Published: October 13, 2013

MUNICH — Next Wednesday (Oct. 16) new portraits go on display in Bavarian State Opera’s lobby. Twenty-one new portraits.

Astrid Varnay, Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau, Kurt Moll, Brigitte Fassbaender, Lucia Popp, Edita Gruberová, René Kollo, Hildegard Behrens and Waltraud Meier are among the worthy singing subjects, company troopers all.

But theatergoers expecting traditional oils on canvas in pretty frames may be in for a shock.

The new dauerhaft pieces embrace painting, drawing, tapestry, photography, hot wax, and at least one video requiring its own flat-panel display, to be hung in a hall that once serenely separated our electronic world from the madness on stage.

To create space in the company’s 114-year-old portrait collection, fifteen tired canvasses recently disappeared into das Lager des Theatermuseums, a.k.a. deep storage, leaving bare walls.

Safe, at least for now, are well-varnished depictions of such epoch-defining Munich musicians as Heinrich Vogl and Therese Thoma, Wagner’s first Loge (1869) and first Sieglinde (1870).

But 21 new faces? The growth spurt — involving the same number of visual artists and two years’ gestation — is intended to correct a lull. Apparently only conductor Wolfgang Sawallisch and impresario Peter Jonas have been added to the collection since the 1960s.

And it serves another purpose. Fifty years have passed since Bavarian State Opera resumed operations at Munich’s National Theater, on Nov. 21, 1963, long after the house was cratered by Allied bombs. Rebuilding cost: 60 million Deutschmarks, or thereabouts.

Friends of the company (Freunde des Nationaltheaters München e.V.) wanted to seize the occasion to acknowledge the work of singers in each subsequent decade.

The result is portrait commissions that are a little front-loaded. Hermann Prey, for instance, who sang leading roles starting in the 1960s, is honored alongside salad-green contributors such as Klaus Florian Vogt, who began in the 2000s and may or may not prove to be a singer of lasting artistry.

At any rate, the collection is made current, and presumably hipper, by this large initiative.

Other subjects of the commissions include Munich favorites Margaret Price, Júlia Várady, Wolfgang Brendel and the still-active, though wobbly, Peter Seiffert.

An odd choice is Fritz Wunderlich, the honey-toned Mozart tenor who died young. He went through the company’s apprentice program before the house reopened, but then bolted for a career contract in rival Vienna.

Today’s singers in the lineup, besides Vogt, are Anja Harteros, Diana Damrau, Jonas Kaufmann, Christian Gerhaher and Wolfgang Koch.

Administrative enthusiasm and the sheer scale of the effort have led to at least one creaky assignment, its outcome already made public, that for Damrau. The soprano gets photography-based treatment that manages to degrade and marginalize her without giving the viewer a sense of who she is.

With luck, this will be the qualitative exception.

Bronze busts of the company’s music directors, meanwhile, comprise another facet of the theater’s art. At present this series is complete through Zubin Mehta, who left in 2006.

As it happens, a new Generalmusikdirektor, Kirill Petrenko, took over last month on a five-year contract, and so the just-departed Kent Nagano will likely soon be commemorated in three-dimensional metal.

Print and online material related to the company’s 2013–14 season, not incidentally, showcases black-and-white photographs of the bombed-out house as well as 1963 crowds after the reopening.

Soberly its slogan taps Nietzsche: Wie man wird, was man ist.

How One Becomes What One Is — a smooth segue to a bleaker side of the retrospective. Official research has at last begun into correspondence between the Nazi Party and two former Bavarian State Opera GMDs, Richard Strauss (tenure 1894–1896) and Clemens Krauss (1937–1944).

Petrenko, looking forward, gives his first concert next month, a freebie with Nina Stemme, Kaufmann, and the virtuosic Bavarian State Orchestra.

A few days later, on the anniversary itself, he leads a new staging of Die Frau ohne Schatten, the opera that reopened the National Theater under GMD Joseph Keilberth one day before Kennedy was shot.

Some of Petrenko’s initial work will be streamed at www.staatsoper.de/tv: Die Frau ohne Schatten (directed by Krzysztof Warlikowski) on Dec. 1; La clemenza di Tito (Jan Bosse) on Feb. 15, 2014; and Die Soldaten (Andreas Kriegenburg) on May 31.

Here’s hoping the new portraits, in the aggregate, adequately reflect the virtues of this remarkable institution!

Photo © Wilfried Hösl

Related posts:
In Your Face, Astrid
Petrenko Preps Strauss Epic
Flitting Thru Prokofiev
Ettinger Drives Aida
Petrenko to Extend in Munich

The Deadline Made Me Do It

October 11th, 2013

Tune in next Thursday for another testament to why I left Muncie: Valery Gergiev, currently at the Met and with his Mariinsky Orchestra at Carnegie Hall, through Tuesday the 15th.

VIVA VERDI

October 10th, 2013

By James Conlon

Today the world is marking the two-hundredth birthday of Giuseppe Verdi. It started already last night (he may have possibly been born in the evening of October 9). In either case, it really has been going on all year, and well it should.

Verdi has been with me my entire life, since hearing my first opera, La Traviata, at eleven years old. Not just the composer, but also the man is an immense inspiration.  A lifetime of conducting his works has only magnified those feelings.

I treated myself to a weekend in Chicago, to attend the opening night of the Lyric Opera (Otello) and a concert performance of Macbeth with the Chicago Symphony conducted by Riccardo Muti.

Aside from the magnificent performance, Maestro Muti had some very witty words to say about Verdi and Wagner (whose bicentennial it is as well). There was a résumé of those words printed in the program. I quote them in part:

“Verdi is like Mozart–he speaks to us about our sins, our defects, all our qualities. And he is not like Beethoven, who points his finger and judges–because Beethoven was always a moralist…Verdi’s music will be of great comfort for generations and generations to come, because he speaks to us like a man speaking to another person.

“When Verdi died, Gabriele d’Annunzio, the famous Italian poet, wrote a few lines which I think perfectly express who Verdi was: “Diede una voce alle speranze e ai lutti, pianse ed amò per tutti” he gave a voice to all our hopes and struggles, he wept and loved for all of us.”

On the editorial page of today’s New York Times, there are five letters to the editor reacting to a front page article from October 4 entitled “For Better Social Skills, Scientists Recommend a Little Chekhov.” The article, well worth reading, reports studies published in the journal Science.  The study found that after reading literary fiction or serious non-fiction, people performed better on tests measuring empathy, social perception and emotional intelligence.

The last of the five letters published today, written by Kathleen Crisci, reflected my immediate reaction, that one should make a similar study for various genres of music. She writes, “Who could listen to the pathos of a Beethoven Symphony…and not feel empathy and compassion?”

Art, almost by definition, does not need to justify itself, nor does classical music. But those of us who believe deeply in its value, and who live a life devoted to it, might be enthusiastic to see a similar study conducted, if for no other reason than for it to strengthen the argument for renewed inclusion of the arts in our children’s schools.

I do not know if there is any scientific evidence that listening to classical music has the same effect as was noted by the research cited in the New York Times, but my intuition suggests to me that it does. At least I would like to think so. I suspect that a lot of people reading this Musical America blog would also like to think so. And were they to conduct such a study, they should include the music of the king of empathy, social perception and emotional intelligence:  Giuseppe Verdi.

The Power of Contractual Silence

October 10th, 2013

By Brian Taylor Goldstein, Esq.

Dear Law and Disorder

 

We booked an artist to perform at our theater, but ticket sales have been much lower than we expected. The show is a month away. We are a small venue with a small budget, and can’t afford to present an artist if we can’t sell enough tickets to cover the costs. We signed an engagement contract, but it doesn’t cover cancellations, unless it’s for illness or weather related. As the contract is silent on this, I offered the agent what I thought was a standard buy-out fee (25% of the total fee), but he is insisting on the full amount. That doesn’t seem fair.

 

What doesn’t seem fair? That you signed a contract and the agent is expecting you to live up to your end of the bargain? The whole point of a written contract is to memorialize all of the terms, understandings, conditions, and requirements of a business transaction—even if the transaction is in show business. If a party fails to abide by a term, understanding, condition, or requirement of a written contract, then that party has “breached” the contract.

Just like music is a combination of both sounds and silence, terms and requirements that are not part of a written contract are just as important, if not more important, than the ones that are. This is because only terms, understandings, conditions, and requirements that are actually written down are considered to be part of a legally binding contract. So, for example, if an artist wanted to be paid his fee on the night of the performance, but the engagement contract only states the amount of the fee and not when it is to be paid, then the presenter is not obligated to pay the fee on a specific date. Similarly, if an engagement contract doesn’t have a cancellation clause, then there is no right to cancel and neither party can cancel without the consent of the other. This means that, if the artist gets a better offer, she doesn’t have the right to cancel the engagement. However, it also means that you don’t have the right to cancel, either, just because you’re not selling enough tickets.

I frequently hear both agents and presents talk about “industry standards and customs” as a way to resolve contractual disputes or re-negotiate contracts they didn’t bother to read in the first place. Except in rare circumstances, industry standards and customs are completely and utterly irrelevant. Moreover, if you gathered four arts professionals in a room and asked them to describe industry standards and customs on any given topic, you would get four different answers! If a contract fails to address an issue or condition that is important to you, you cannot presume that you get to resolve the silence in your favor and do what you want. Rather, if the contract is silent on a specific issue, then both parties must agree on a resolution of that issue.

In your case, if your venue’s policy is to cancel an engagement if you can’t sell enough tickets, then you need to make sure that this policy is written into every engagement contract you sign. Otherwise, you have no right to do so. If you cancel, and the artist or the artist’s agent doesn’t agree to accept a lesser amount, you are liable to pay the full amount of the engagement fee—so, assuming there are no other cost savings to you in cancelling and still paying the full fee, you might as well let the show go on.

_________________________________________________________________

For additional information and resources on this and other legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ggartslaw.com

To ask your own question, write to lawanddisorder@musicalamerica.org.

All questions on any topic related to legal and business issues will be welcome. However, please post only general questions or hypotheticals. GG Arts Law reserves the right to alter, edit or, amend questions to focus on specific issues or to avoid names, circumstances, or any information that could be used to identify or embarrass a specific individual or organization. All questions will be posted anonymously.

__________________________________________________________________

THE OFFICIAL DISCLAIMER:

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!

The purpose of this blog is to provide general advice and guidance, not legal advice. Please consult with an attorney familiar with your specific circumstances, facts, challenges, medications, psychiatric disorders, past-lives, karmic debt, and anything else that may impact your situation before drawing any conclusions, deciding upon a course of action, sending a nasty email, filing a lawsuit, or doing anything rash!

DIY Publicity

October 10th, 2013

By: Edna Landau

In my most recent blog post, I addressed the question of how to find a publicist for a special project. The reality is, however, that many young musicians are not in a position to pay a publicist even for an individual project. For this reason, I am dedicating this column to DIY publicity. The information herein has been gained from speaking to valued colleagues, a number of whom regularly dedicate considerable time to counseling young musicians on this topic, whether during visits to music schools and conservatories or as part of their business activities.

I have often wondered how much attention a journalist will pay to a recording or project that has been brought to their attention by the artist directly, rather than a publicist. The result of my investigation was heartening. While a pitch from a publicist may catch the writer’s eye more immediately, it is the content of the pitch which really matters the most. James Inverne,  former editor of Gramophone magazine and currently Co-Managing Director of Inverne Price Music Consultancy, told me that although he thought of himself as a highly approachable editor while at Gramophone, he rarely had time to do his homework on artists who approached him out of the blue. It helped, therefore, when they had a publicist whose artistic standards he trusted as it was a good indicator of their potential. It also helped if the artist was with a good record label or was championed by a known artist. However, of paramount importance was whether the artist seemed clear in their own mind as to who they were artistically and whether they were able to present themselves in a way that would make an editor care about them. He elaborated on that by saying that “there is thinking to be done before there is pitching to be done.” If an artist doesn’t have a manager or publicist, it helps if they have an adviser with whom they can have strategic and artistic discussions prior to mounting any sort of publicity campaign.

In the course of my work on this column, I was introduced by Rebecca Davis to Sarah Baird Knight of DOTDOTDOTMUSIC, who truly touched me with her dedication to educating young people about promoting their activities through building their identity, with an eye towards maximizing their potential for eventual press coverage. She and her business partner, Steven Swartz, visited Princeton University this past summer to speak to percussion students and composers at So Percussion’s Summer Institute. As part of their business, they offer in depth one-on-one consultations with artists in which they explore everything from building an effective website to navigating social media and communicating appropriately with the press. They believe that there is considerable homework to be done by any artist seeking publicity, such as establishing a presence on Facebook and Twitter and participating actively in “the many water cooler conversations that happen there daily,” as well as generously sharing interesting and helpful information with others. Ms. Knight concurs with James Inverne that a critical activity is “launching entrepreneurial projects that articulate one’s artistic identity and passion”. An equally important step is to regularly “collect interested parties of all stripes into a mailing list”. The larger the fan base you can attract and build and the clearer your artistic identity, the greater the chance that you can also attract press attention. She cautions, however, that one should never add a press person to one’s mailing list without first gaining their permission.  A good way to do this when writing to someone in the media is to mention your upcoming event with a link to further information about it, and to ask whether you might stay in touch with them about yourself or your ensemble. This might be a bit less “threatening” than to ask outright whether you might add them to your mailing list.

Amanda Sweet of Bucklesweet Media underscored to me the importance of knowing something about individual writers and what they like to cover. If you’ve read something by them that you really liked, it can’t hurt to mention that when you approach them. Nancy Shear suggested to me that an attention-getting e-mail might include a statement about a particular connection that the artist might have to works they are performing or recording — for example, if the work has folk-based themes and the artist has a strong connection to that culture or country, or if their teacher studied with or knew the composer.

I have always felt that the biggest obstacle for an artist trying to approach the press directly is obtaining their contact information. Ms. Knight suggested that artists make Google their best friend. A Google search of artists making music similar to theirs will yield information about where they have received coverage. They might gain information also from searching the artist’s e-mail address or Twitter handle. Once they have targeted a group of press outlets, they might well find an e-mail address on the masthead of the publication. Even info@email addresses should be noted and used. She also drew my attention to the following very useful Twitter directory:  http://mcmvanbree.com/dutchperspective/twitter/people.htm. Artists should be sure not to overlook blogs and online publications. An excellent resource for this is The Big List of Classical Music Blogs.

I haven’t yet addressed the mechanics of preparing press releases and calendar listings for dissemination to the press. Happily, many schools currently offer their students classes and seminars which address this topic. Angela Myles Beeching’s excellent book Beyond Talent is a wonderful source of information (pages 183-197). Examples can also be found on Google by entering “writing a successful (or great, or effective) press release.”

Gail Wein of Classical Music Communications was kind enough to draw my attention to two new websites which artists might consider in their DIY approaches: New York Classical Review and Classical Voice North America. New York Classical Review was founded by critic and writer Lawrence A. Johnson. It joins earlier results of his efforts including The Classical Review and websites covering the arts in Boston, Chicago and South Florida. In an e-mail to me, Mr. Johnson indicated that they are happy to receive information about any professional classical concerts of interest. However, he pointed out that with the large volume of cultural offerings in New York each day, their coverage will be less comprehensive on the newest website than in other cities. They will naturally cover high-profile events but are also interested in presentations in smaller venues and programs that are offbeat in nature. Information should be sent to ljohnson@theclassicalreview.com.

Classical Voice North America was launched by The Music Critics Association of North America.  It is a “new web journal of music criticism and commentary written by its members and occasional guest contributors. “ According to Barbara Jepson, president of the MCANA and a frequent writer for the Wall Street Journal’s Leisure & Arts, as well as other national publications, “it was created to provide increased coverage of classical music at a time when it has been reduced or eliminated in traditional print outlets.” I asked Ms. Jepson whether there was a vehicle for performing artists without publicists to submit ideas for coverage by CVNA.  She said that it was fine to send e-mails or press releases to their local critics who might contribute to the website or to CVNA.editor@gmail.com. She suggested that submissions should focus on events of national interest, such as a concert tour rather than a single engagement, or an event that might involve unusual repertoire or new scholarship, or that might tie in with a national trend. It is not impossible that a single concert might be covered, especially if the program included the premiere of a new work written by a widely recognized composer or one who has begun to attract significant attention. Further guidelines can be found in the “Contact the Editors” section of CVNA’s website. It should also be noted that CVNA is interested in hearing from performers who can write articulately about issues that are important to them, or discuss some aspect of music that they are performing that would be of interest to a classical music audience.

At my request, Ms. Jepson offered a few words of advice to artists approaching the press on their own. She suggested that if you make an initial contact and do not hear anything back after a few weeks, it is fine to send a follow-up e-mail. Writers are deluged with releases and also are frequently working under deadlines. However, if there is no response after the second approach, she suggests that you try someone else. In such an instance, she emphasized that the artist should never take it personally if they do not receive a response. It doesn’t mean that their project isn’t worthy. It just means that the publication or website has decided for whatever reason not to follow through at that time. She added that it’s not realistic to expect that critics will give personal feedback on a recording or performance unless they formally do so in a review. Overall, she suggested that “the best thing a performer can do to attract press attention is to learn to think like a music journalist. What’s new? What represents a trend? What’s a different viewpoint from the prevailing orthodoxy?” This advice seems eminently logical and succinctly to the point for anyone developing an independent publicity strategy.

© Edna Landau 2013