The “je ne sais quoi” of Great Talent

March 30th, 2011

By Edna Landau

To ask a question, please write Ask Edna.

This week, I am deviating slightly from my usual format and answering the one question I have been asked repeatedly throughout my career: How can you tell if someone has the potential to be great? Although there is no response that fits all situations, I hope that the experience related below will reveal some of the answers. 

It is Saturday night, March 26, 2011. I am sitting in a small chair, almost elbow to elbow with the person next to me at New York City’s Metropolitan Room. The place is packed and there is much anticipation in the air. Finally, the lights dim and a highly attractive 26-year old Juilliard-trained soprano in an elegant green gown takes the stage. She lifts the microphone and begins to sing Jerome Kern and Oscar Hammerstein’s “All the Things You Are”. I get the goose bumps during this very first song, always a sign that something special is happening. At the conclusion of the song, she thanks everyone who made her show possible and tells us how lucky she feels to be sharing her favorite music from the Great American Songbook with us. I, in turn, feel lucky to be there. Everything I read in Stephen Holden’s very enthusiastic New York Times review has come to life within a very few minutes. Jennifer Sheehan has won my heart with her gracious, unpretentious welcome and warm, comfortable stage presence. The spell is never broken over the course of the next one and a half hours. 

I ask myself afterwards: How did this happen? How did she totally distract me from my aggravation over the astronomical sum of money I had just committed to paying when I parked my car in a garage across the street? First and foremost, it was her joy in performing, but that wouldn’t have gripped me for long had it not been coupled with a beautifully thought-out program, interspersed with personal vignettes about her career and the meaning that many of the songs held for her. She shared her awe about sitting on the same stage as Audra McDonald and Stephen Sondheim on the day she graduated from Juilliard. (Ms. McDonald gave the commencement address and Mr. Sondheim received an honorary degree.) She then proceeded to sing two Sondheim songs that captured how she felt on that day. A delightful song called “Do You Miss Me” gave Ms. Sheehan the opportunity to share her first experience hearing Andrea Marcovicci as a teenager in her native St. Louis. Little did she know when she purchased Ms. Marcovicci’s cd (which included that song) following the concert that she would later become a significant mentor in her career. She introduced her rendition of “I’ll be Seeing You” by relating how she once performed it in a nursing home for Alzheimer’s patients and midway through the song, heard them humming along and saw some of them reaching for their neighbor’s hand. One got the impression that her various appearances at nursing homes were among her most memorable. None of this sounded calculated or artificial. Ms. Sheehan was subtly transmitting to me why I should care about hearing this music at this particular time. 

It was a long and demanding program. Ninety minutes of singing and talking without a break. Her voice never faltered. Her Juilliard training, combined with an obvious flair for acting and a musical gift that was repeatedly displayed in her perfect intonation and exquisite phrasing, was always in evidence. She coupled disparate songs in unexpected ways, choosing to have us reflect on the timeless beauty of “Some Enchanted Evening” through the lens of Adam Guettel’s “Fable” from “The Light in the Piazza”, which immediately followed. (Adam Guettel is Richard Rodgers’ grandson.) I felt enriched by the introduction to two songs by Susan Werner, whose music I had never heard before. I found myself whooping and cheering along with everyone else at the conclusion of an irresistible and virtuosic “If You Hadn’t But You Did” and wishing that the program wouldn’t come to an end. When it did, Ms. Sheehan barely paused long enough to take a drink of water and immediately dashed out to the venue’s main exit (where her sister was selling cd’s) so that she could be sure to greet her appreciative audience and personally thank them for coming. I was one of the first to add my name to her mailing list. It’s not that I need to receive more e-mails or Facebook invitations. I just want to be sure to know the next time she is performing within 100 miles of my home. 

To ask a question, please write Ask Edna.

© Edna Landau 2011  

April Dance Happenings: New York City

March 29th, 2011

By Rachel Straus

 March 29 – April 9

Eiko & Koma

The Japanese avant-garde artists, whose home has been the U.S. since 1976, present the New York premiere of Naked at the Baryshnikov Arts Center. They will be intermittently naked, but what will stand out are their glacially slow movement tableaus that change one’s perception of time. Come with your patience, but know that you don’t have to stay the whole evening. The duo is offering Naked as an art installation. Audience members can come and go.

April 2

Dance of the Enchantress

At the Peter Norton Symphony Space, the South Indian classical dancer Vijayalakshmi will present herself in the dance style Mohiniyattam, which translates as “the Dance of the Enchantress.” According to ancient Indian legend, Vishnu the Preserver transformed himself into Mohini, an enchantress, in order to protect the universe from evil. Femininity and grace pervade the codified movements that alternate between pure dance and story telling. Performing along side Vijayalakshmi will be Palakal Rajagopalan (vocal), Muralee Krishnan (veena – lute), Sreekumar Kadampatt (edakka – hourglass-shaped drum), and Jayan Das (maddalam and mrdangam – double-headed tuned drums).

April 4

Merce Cunningham

On a monthly basis, the the Baryshnikov Arts Center has been showing Charles Atlas’ films of Merce Cunningham’s dances. Seeing Cunningham’s out-of-repertory works on a big screen is a boon to dance lovers. The next BAC flicks is eyeSpace (2006), which features music by David Behrman, costumes and sets by Daniel Arsham, and performances by the Cunningham dancers. The event begins with the webcast series called Mondays with Merce, which gives viewers deeper insight into Cunningham’s choreographic process. Valda Setterfield, a Cunningham performer from 1964-1974, will narrate and comment.

April 5-10

Stephen Petronio Dance Company

At the Joyce Theater, Stephen Petronio Company will present the New York premiere of Underland (2003). The work premiered with the Sydney Dance Company. It’s set to 14 songs by Australian rocker Nick Cave. It features multi-media projections by Mike Daly, another Down Under artist. Petronio’s evening-length work, now set on his 11 company members, is thick with movement and hipness.

April 8

“Ballet with a Modern Sensibility”

The 92nd St. Y’s “Fridays at Noon” free performance series continues with “Ballet with a Modern Sensibility.” Three choreographers—Christopher Caines, Brian Carey Chung, and Helen Heineman—will present excerpts of their new works, set to Italian Baroque music, and composers Meredith Monk, Arnold Schoenberg, Frédéric Mompou, Debussy, Beethoven, and Lou Harrison.

April 6-17

Ailey II

At The Ailey Citigroup Theater (the black box in the dance organization’s west 55 St. home), the second company will hold a two-week season. Six works and two programs will be danced by the 14-member Ailey II troupe, which travels the world almost as much as the parent company. The premieres include The Corner, a full ensemble work by Kyle Abraham—known for his fusion of popping, locking and post-modern dance—Doscongio by Robert Moses, set to two movements of Chopin’s Sonata for cello and piano (op. 65), and Shards by Donald Byrd, with music by Mio Morales.

April 14 – 16

Paradigm

At St. Mark’s Church, the pick-up troupe—comprised of dancers whose stage careers span several decades—will present two world premieres by its founding members, Carmen de Lavallade and Gus Solomons, Jr. The opening night performance will be followed by a celebration of Paradigm’s 15th anniversary and Carmen de Lavallade’s 80th birthday at Lautrec Bistro. You can join them, for a price, or just go to the show, which features a cast of eight veteran dancers, and a solo performance by Kyle Abraham, Solomon’s former student.

April 11

Dance Theatre of Harlem

At City Center Studio 5, Dance Theatre of Harlem’s artistic director Virginia Johnson and former New York City Ballet principal dancer Damian Woetzel will host an informal evening, focusing on the history of the first American black ballet company, founded at the height of the Civil Rights movement by Arthur Mitchell and Karel Shook. The pared-down company of dancers will perform excerpts from the repertoire.

April 12-24

DanceBrazil

DanceBrazil returns to The Joyce Theater with A Jornada (The Path), the high-octane 2001 work by artistic director Jelon Vieira. The evening-length piece is said the chart the path of Africans to Brazil. The Afro-Brazilian martial arts form Capoeira is used to express the emergence of Afro-Brazilian culture.

April 13-16

Juliette Mapp

At Dance Theater Workshop, Juliette Mapp will present her newest work, The Making of the Americans. Based on Gertrude Stein’s namesake novel about being from two worlds, Mapp’s evening-length, multi-media piece will investigate her mother’s family who emigrated from Albania to Gary, Indiana. The most famous citizen of Gary was Michael Jackson. He too will be part of Mapp’s dance theater work performed by eight dancers.

April 13

Ron Brown, Sean Curran, and Nelida Tirado

At the Museum of Art & Design’s black box subterranean theater, Ron Brown, Sean Curran, and Nelida Tirado will present works of whose content remains unknown. Fear not. Brown choreographs delightful concoctions drawn from West African and modern dance. Sean Curran does the same with Irish step dancing and contemporary concert dance movement. Tirado approaches the Flamenco tradition through her wide-ranging, eclectic performing experience.

April 15

Weidman, Maslow, Dudley, and Yuriko

At the 92nd St. Y, the free “Fridays at Noon” performance series continues with “Legacy Performance: Weidman, Maslow, Dudley, Yuriko.” Performed by students and professionals, the event will offer four works by three choreographers, who represented American modern dance’s second generation, interested in political activism. Weidman’s masterwork Lynchtown (1936) remains a powerful, seminal dance work.

April 15-30

John Kelly

At P.S. 122, performance and visual artist John Kelly will present The Escape Artist (2010), which “traces the story of a man who has a trapeze accident while rehearsing a theatre piece based on the life of Italian Baroque painter, Caravaggio. Stranded on a gurney with a broken neck in the hospital emergency room, he finds refuge in the images that flood his mind—the sinners and saints, prostitutes and gods that populate Caravaggio’s paintings. The Escape Artist contains seven original songs by John Kelly & Carol Lipnik, as well as covers of songs by Claudio Monteverdi and John Barry.” (from P.S. 122 website)

April 17

Swan Lake

At the Brooklyn Center for the Performing Arts, the Russian National Ballet Theatre will present their version of Swan Lake. The company was founded in Moscow in the 1980s, when many artists from Soviet Union’s ballet institutions were forming new companies. Former Bolshoi Ballet principal dancer Elena Radchenko helms the company, known for performing works from the full-length, late 19th-century ballet repertoire.

April 25

Dance Against Cancer

At Manhattan Movement & Arts Center, the benefit performance “Dance Against Cancer” will offer performances by New York City Ballet dancers Daniel Ulbricht, Robert Fairchild, Amar Ramasar, Tyler Angle, Craig Hall, Wendy Whelan, Maria Kowroski, and Sterling Hyltin, as well as appearances by other well-known New York-based dancers. There will be three world premieres, created by fledgling ballet choreographers, and six short dance works created by George Balanchine, Christopher Wheeldon, Benjamin Millepied, Larry Keigwin, Lar Lubovitch, and Earl Mosley.

April 26-May 8

Armitage Gone! Dance

At The Joyce Theater, the company called Armitage Gone! Dance is back with a world premiere called GAGA-Gaku. It inspired by Cambodian Court dance and includes performances by Dance Theater of Harlem dancers. The two-week season features two programs, the second of which is a full-evening length dance based on Einstein’s theories of relativity and matter.

April 28–29

Valley of the Dolls

At Joe’s Pub, Nicole Wolcott and Vanessa Walters present their new cabaret piece, Alley of the Dolls (This is not a sequel). Inspired by the characters from Valley of the Dolls and Beyond the Valley of the Dolls, the dance ladies and their cohorts will likely spoof the B movies’ clichés about femininity with their popular brand of athleticism and tongue-and-cheek vulgarity.

April 29

World Dance Day

April 29 is World Dance Day, according to the International Dance Council CID, UNESCO.

April 29

Pearl Primus

At the 92nd St. Y, the free “Fridays at Noon” series continues with “Legacy Performance: Celebrating Pearl Primus.” One of the most important black American modern dance choreographers, Primus made three groundbreaking solos The Negro Speaks of Rivers, Strange Fruit, and Hard Time Blues. Students will perform the dances. A new book, The Dance Claimed Me (Yale University Press), will be on sale. The authors will read passages from their biography.

 

 

 

Bluebeards I Have Known

March 24th, 2011

by Sedgwick Clark

Esa-Pekka Salonen’s three-week Hungarian Echoes “festival” of works by Haydn, Ligeti, and Bartók with the New York Philharmonic has become one of the season’s highlights. On Tuesday I heard the second program again, the one with Bartók’s Bluebeard’s Castle. To hear this emotionally devastating score played, sung, and conducted so extraordinarily well, twice in the space of four days, is good fortune on a scarcely believable level. Amazingly, these audiences seemed to realize it. Except for the old coot with a catarrh and St. Vitus’s Dance sitting in front of PK, whom she had to reprimand when he flipped open a cell phone to text, the Philharmonic’s notoriously rude audience held its collective breath for over 65 minutes on both nights until E-P lowered his baton. On the way out I ran into my old friend Mary Jane Wright, formerly in the Phil’s subscription department, who recalled past performances of Bluebeard in this hall when audience members began departing 20 minutes into the piece.

If this week’s Philharmonic audiences found Bartók’s dark essay into spiritual loneliness more engaging, no small praise is due to the emotional conviction of the soloists, mezzo-soprano Michelle DeYoung and bass Gábor Bretz. There was plenty of eye contact and visible human feeling between two people whose sole actions are disagreement on whether or not to unlock the castle’s seven ominous doors. And they both had voices to knock us for a loop—he the low notes at his first entrance, and she that powerful high C which pinned me to the back of my seat as she opened the fifth door to reveal Bluebeard’s panoramic landholdings. The sudden illumination of the house lights at that point after half an hour of various hues of darkness was heart-stopping, even the second time around. The bass, new to me, was most impressive indeed as he poured out his heart to Judith before she joins his three previous wives behind the seventh door. He clearly deserves to be singing in the States as often as his bio reveals he does in Europe. (How about it, Met?)

Truly, the only misstep of the evening was the artificiality of the recorded sound of the doors opening. The program’s first half offered a pair of nonstop delights: the early Ligeti Concert Românesc (1951), which could have been mistaken for an Enescu rhapsody, and the Haydn Symphony No. 7 (Le Midi), with delicious solo work by concertmaster Glenn Dicterow and first cellist Carter Brey. Both pieces should be played often.

You’ll kick yourself—or at least you should—if you don’t catch Salonen’s third and last program on March 24, 25, or 26: Haydn’s Symphony No. 8 (Le Soir), Ligeti’s Clocks and Clouds, and Bartók’s First Piano Concerto (with Olli Mustonen) and Miraculous Mandarin Suite as the roof-raising finale.

Bartók’s only opera may not have been programmed often at the Phil, but the occasions were auspicious: Kertész (1969), Kubélik (1981), Dohnányi (2006), and now Salonen. Surprisingly, Boulez never did it while music director in the Seventies, but at least he finally got around to it at Carnegie with the Chicago Symphony last season. A word about the Kubélik program: The first of his four performances occurred on Bartók’s centennial, March 25, 1981, paired with the composer’s MUSPAC. Soloists were Tatiana Troyanos and Siegmund Nimsgern, and the live recording was released on the orchestra’s own label in the first of its five ten-CD historic broadcast sets, “New York Philharmonic: The Historic Broadcasts, 1923 to 1987.”

I caught a later performance of Kubélik’s Bluebeard, not the centennial one, because Antal Doráti and the Detroit Symphony were at Carnegie Hall with a pair of all-Bartók concerts. On March 23, György Sándor played the Piano Concerto No. 3, of which he had given the premiere in 1946 with Ormandy and Philadelphia; Bluebeard’s Castle was on the second half. I remember I felt that Doráti had underplayed the massive C major tutti when Judith opens the fifth door, which perplexed me until the moment she walked through the seventh door at the end and the conductor unleashed one of the loudest, most dissonant chords I’ve ever heard. In my best Stagedoor Johnny demeanor I went backstage to tell him of my epiphany, and he said, smiling broadly, “Yes, yes, that’s the climax of the opera!” On the actual centennial, Doráti’s program was Miraculous Mandarin Suite, Violin Concerto No. 2, with Yehudi Menuhin in top form, and Concerto for Orchestra. Wow! Only in New York.

Denk Steps in for Pollini at Carnegie

Pianist Jeremy Denk will make his Carnegie Hall recital debut on Sunday afternoon, playing Ives’s “Concord” Sonata and Bach’s Goldberg Variations, the piece he played a few weeks ago that impressed me so. He’s replacing Maurizio Pollini, who has cancelled his U.S. concert tour due to illness.

Looking Forward

My week’s scheduled concerts:

3/24 Avery Fisher Hall. New York Philharmonic/Esa-Pekka Salonen; Olli Mustonen, piano. Haydn: Symphony No. 8 (Le Soir). Bartók: Piano Concerto No. 1; Miraculous Mandarin Suite; Ligeti: Clocks and Clouds.

3/25 Alice Tully Hall. Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center. Mahler: Piano Quartet in A minor. Berg: Piano Sonata, Op. 1; Shostakovich: Piano Trio No. 1; Bartók: Piano Quintet.

3/26 Carnegie Hall. Toronto Symphony/Peter Oundjian; Itzhak Perlman, violin. Britten: Four Sea Interludes from Peter Grimes. Bruch: Violin Concerto No. 1. John Estacio: Frenergy. Vaughan Williams: Symphony No. 4.

3/27 Carnegie Hall. Jeremy Denk, piano. Ives: Sonata No. 2 (Concord). Bach: Goldberg Variations. (Note: This pianist and program replaces Maurizio Pollini, who cancelled due to illness.)

3/27 Alice Tully Hall. Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center. Belcea Quartet. Mozart: Quartet in B-flat, K. 589. Turnage: new work (NY premiere). Beethoven: Quartet in B-flat, Op. 130, with Grosse Fuge, Op. 133.

3/29 Carnegie Hall. American Symphony/Leon Botstein; Blair McMillen, piano; Miranda Cuckson, violin. Piston: Toccata; Concertino for Piano and Chamber Orchestra; Symphony No. 2; Violin Concerto No. 1; Symphony No. 4.

3/30 Metropolitan Opera. Wagner: Das Rheingold. Fabio Luisi, cond.; Harmer, Blythe, Bardon, R. Croft, Siegel, Terfel, Fink, Selig König.

Here’s My Program—Where Do I Fit?

March 23rd, 2011

by Edna Landau

To ask a question please write Ask Edna.

Dear Edna:

So wonderful of you to take questions!

I run an ensemble called “Ljova and the Kontraband” which primarily performs its own original music. Its sound is informed by the classical, folk, jazz and world music traditions.

Whenever I hear an artist speak about music they’d like to perform or compose, the conversation often touches upon the concept of “genre” in music, and borders between musical genres (classical/jazz/opera/musical theatre, etc.). Artists feel confined and want to tear down these borders to create music that draws on a variety of influences and backgrounds. It seems that presenters have a similar mind. They just want to present that which is good and hope that the audiences will follow. How important is genre to an audience?—Lev Zhurbin

Dear Lev:

Thanks for your insightful and very interesting question.

One of the reasons that artists are so fortunate to be concertizing at this time is that boundaries separating various genres of music are, in fact, less defined than ever before. Presenters know more about their audiences than they did in the past and are more willing to take chances in order to grow those audiences. They are also communicating more personally and directly with them and, consequently, building greater trust that everything they are presenting is compelling and worth hearing, regardless of genre. The icing on the cake is that journalists who have spent a large part of their careers reviewing traditional classical music concerts seem ecstatic about reviewing programs that draw from various musical genres.

That said, I did a rather hasty, informal survey of some long-time concert presenters’ season offerings and found that they still divide their performances into series with the traditional titles you would expect, such as Chamber Series, Jazz Series, Orchestra Series, and the like. I smiled broadly when I saw the University of California Santa Barbara’s “Out of the Box Series”, which offered, among others, Kayhan Kalhor with Brooklyn Rider, and the Ornette Coleman Quartet. Many presenters put such groups on a “Special Events” series. What this underscores for me is that artists can be as adventurous as they like in their performances, “drawing on a variety of influences” (as you have written), but if their music can’t be easily classified and if it doesn’t fall into one of the usual categories, they may be competing with others for very limited spots. Presenters may be eager to widen the spectrum of their offerings but they don’t want to take their audience by surprise if they are expecting traditional fare. (This means that it may take a while before you see your group included on a Chamber Music Series alongside the Pacifica Quartet!). One solution that some have embraced is to list all presentations as single events and give ticket buyers the opportunity to create their own series.

It is inevitable that some concertgoers will not be interested in buying tickets for music with which they are unfamiliar. They might prefer to hear excellent performances of music they already know or which has been written by composers they recognize. To those people, genre is all-important.  For the others, what matters most is the promise of a fresh, entertaining, enlightening (you choose the adjective) experience. If a group or its programming is new to a city, it is probably beneficial for the presenter and the artists (or their manager) to speak in advance about how to advertise the event and communicate directly about it to subscribers, perhaps in the artists’ own words. If they receive such a letter in the months or weeks prior to an event, they are likely to enter the concert hall already feeling a bond with the artists and anticipating how their words will come alive on stage. It might also be beneficial for the artists to offer their own program notes or to consider giving brief introductions to at least some of the works on the program, in lieu of program notes.

In the end, what matters most is the quality of the artists’ performance and their ability to communicate their excitement over the chosen program in an irresistible way. Once that happens, it ensures that audience and presenter alike will share news of their happy and stimulating experience with their friends and colleagues so that, eventually, substantial word of mouth has built up about your group and it hardly matters what genre describes you, or where you fit.

To ask a question please write Ask Edna.

© Edna Landau 2011

Curating Currents: Robert Wilson at The Guggenheim

March 21st, 2011

By Rachel Straus

The mot du moment in the New York dance scene is “curate.” Dances are usually presented, but museums—From the Whitney to the Museum of Arts & Design—are getting in on the fun. Museums, however, don’t present. And so the fifth “Works & Process” program at the Guggenheim Museum was called “Watermill Quintet—Robert Wilson Curates New Performances” (March 13-14)

With a sold-out audience on March 14, the Peter B. Lewis Theater hummed with excitement. Then began Andrew Ondrejcak’s Veneration #1: The Young Heir Takes Possession of the Master’s Effects. What a title! But the headline bore little relationship to the stage action. Ondrejcak ran in his underwear on a treadmill for about 15 minutes. An excerpt of composer-violinist Michael Galasso’s Les Fables de la Fontaine (a 2004 co-commission with Wilson from the Comédie-Française) created a suitably intense, modernist musical landscape.

Like Wilson’s Einstein on the Beach (1976), the work that put the Texas-born director on the international avant-garde theater map, Veneration included repetition (running), dramatic lighting (by Wilson and John Torres), and a recognizable tone (deadly seriousness). When Ondrejcak fell off the treadmill, I looked at my program notes to find:

“Leading up to the death of his father in 2010, Ondrejcak devised Veneration #1: The Young Heir Takes Possession of the Master’s Effects, in which he isolates and observes the body’s process of physical weakening (and eventual failure)…”

This reviewer did a double take, unsure of whether the program notes corresponded to the stage proceedings. But they did. And so the serious study of the program notes (throughout the show) became part of the performance. Connecting the moving images on stage with the long descriptions of four 15-minute works and six video interludes—created by five artists who had been mentored by Wilson in 2010 at his Watermill Center—became the elusive goal.

Some works seemed to be about so much, as in the case of The Dorothy K.: Shorter Are the Prayers in Bed, but More Heartfelt, which included blood soaked costumes by Anna Telcs. Another seemed to be about so little, as with MOMENT-a duet for one, which involved the choreographer Marianna Kavallieratos and Thanassis Akokkalidis’ moving and sitting across from each other in chairs.

The works bore little relationship to each other. The press release stated that Wilson had made a “visual and performative framework.” In the end, the event felt like subterfuge for the obvious: The star of the show was Wilson. The curator is the new rock star. Performance theory jargon isn’t just for academics. Artists can spin profundities about their creations with mots mysteres. If this approach fostered intellectual stimulation or comedy, that would have been fabulous. But on March 14 at the Guggenheim it created consternation, and multiple departures by formerly excited audience members.

 

 

Gergiev’s Bifurcated Mahler

March 18th, 2011

by Sedgwick Clark

Gustav Mahler was born in 1860 and died in 1911, allowing New Yorkers to celebrate the 150th anniversary of his birth and the centennial of his death with a pair of symphony cycles just two seasons apart. Neither satisfied.

Daniel Barenboim and Pierre Boulez shared the first cycle, leading the Berlin Staatskapelle in May 2009 at Carnegie Hall. I skipped Danny Come Lately’s Mahler and found the Frenchman’s performances precise but little more. I have undimmed memories of strong Boulez performances of the Third, Sixth, and Eighth with the New York Philharmonic while he was music director in the 1970s, but his efforts this time around seemed aimed at keeping a vastly inferior orchestra together.

Valery Gergiev’s Mahler cycle this season was promising to one who heard the superb Mahler Sixth he gave with the New York Philharmonic in 1998, no less memorable than the live-concert performances I heard by Boulez/NYP (1972), Abbado/NYP (1979), Tennstedt/NYP (1986), and Bernstein/VPO (1988). Interestingly, Gergiev split the cycle between the two orchestras of which he is music director: In October he brought his Mariinsky Orchestra to Carnegie Hall (10/17-24) and in February his London Symphony Orchestra to Avery Fisher Hall (2/23-27).

But disappointment set in immediately with the Mariinsky’s shapeless Sixth Symphony. Moments like his perfectly judged transition to the Allegro moderato in the opening pages of the finale would be offset by his trivializing scamper through the rute episode at rehearsal number 134, after the first hammer blow, which Mahler marks “Powerful, but somewhat measured (completely unnoticeably holding back).” Moreover, Gergiev breezed through the finale’s devastating coda with a shocking lack of conviction. Unlike the Philharmonic performance of 13 years before, he reversed the 1963 Mahler-Gesellschaft revised Critical Edition’s order of the middle movements so that the Andante moderato preceded the Scherzo. I won’t go into the lengthy explanation here. Suffice it to say that Mahler himself performed it both ways and died before he could settle the matter definitively. Scherzo-Andante makes stronger emotional sense to me.

The Second Symphony (“Resurrection”) was also compromised by wayward tempos, often lacking breadth at such crucial moments as the buildup to the mighty choral “Aufersteh’n” toward the end. Felicitous solos by the concertmaster and expressive singing by mezzo-soprano Olga Borodina and soprano Anastasia Kalagina (both rightly placed in back with the chorus) aside, the Mariinsky’s ensemble was rarely truly precise, the boys’ chorus lacked sass, and the offstage horns, placed offstage right, were far too loud. In the early 1980s, John Nelson and the Indianapolis Symphony in the “Resurrection” and Julius Rudel and the Buffalo Philharmonic in Mahler’s early cantata Das Klagende Lied placed the offstage instruments way up outside Carnegie’s balcony, and the effect was magical.

In an outrageous feat of Gergievian brinksmanship, the next evening he followed the “Resurrection” with the choral Eighth—the “Symphony of a Thousand.” While never coming close to the finest concert performance I ever heard—by Benjamin Zander and the Boston Philharmonic at Carnegie in 2000—the Russian conductor’s sheer control was mightily impressive. Part I went in one huge sweep, propulsive and dramatic, and Part II hung together as well as this episodic version of the final scene of Goethe’s Faust ever does. Three of the eight vocalists, in particular, stood out: the appealing soprano of Anastasia Kalagina (Una poenitentium), and the leather-lunged baritone Alexei Markov (Pater ecstaticus) and bass Evgeny Nikitin (Pater profundus).

Gergiev proved he was capable of great Mahler the next day with a Fifth Symphony that recalled the first Solti/Chicago (1970), Comissiona/Baltimore (1975), and Bernstein/Vienna (1989) performances in Carnegie. For once the Mariinsky’s playing had the security of adequate rehearsal time and conducting that bespoke thorough identification with the score. At one point in the second movement the frantic turbulence dies down, leaving a lonely cello line to lament expressively. “Even if the rest of his Mahler is a disaster,” I scrawled in the program, “his shaping of the cellos on page 70 is worth the entire cycle.” No less masterfully conducted and paced was the climax of the movement, in keeping with the entire performance. The 70-minute symphony was given on a Friday morning to a largely student—and very attentive—audience.

The Mariinsky musicians got a well-deserved rest on Saturday (10/23) while Gergiev was leading a stunningly well-played Boris Godunov at the Metropolitan Opera.

Gergiev was rehearsing the Mariinsky until the house opened on Sunday afternoon, which didn’t bode well for the Orchestra’s concluding Mahler performances of the Fourth and First Symphonies, and indeed both were disappointing. Pianissimos were rarely quiet, slides in the strings were non-existent (a deficit throughout the Mariinsky performances), and the offstage brass at the beginning of the First were neither “in the distance” nor evocative.

Unlike the Mariinsky, the London Symphony Orchestra’s credentials as a Mahler orchestra are distinguished and long-standing. It came as a shock, therefore, that the first of its performances, of the Seventh Symphony, was ghastly—so unremittingly ugly in sonority as if the LSO or its conductor had never coped with Fisher Hall’s often harsh acoustics. The brass and high woodwinds sheared your ears off, with the strings consistently overbalanced. Stop-go-stop-go went the first movement. The two Nachtmusik movements were devoid of charm, nostalgia, and warmth. The hare-brained finale never cohered. Only the central Scherzo, with its teeth-chattering triplets, queasy portamentos, and bump-in-the-night percussive effects, succeeded in capturing the movement’s appropriate grotesquerie.

The LSO seemed a different orchestra two days later in the Third Symphony—comparatively full-toned and warmly balanced, with brass that made their point without overwhelming the strings. After the Seventh, I was relieved that for most of the piece Gergiev seemed inspired by the Third’s paean to Nature. This is the symphony about which Mahler told his visiting friend Bruno Walter, who was admiring the surrounding mountains, “No need to look. I have composed all this already!” The varied sections of the 34-minute opening movement marched ahead exuberantly. The middle movements went well, including an immaculately played posthorn solo, again compromised severely by its placement just offstage. Gergiev chose a moderate tempo for the slow finale that he sustained well until the last page, which Mahler indicates “Not with crude force! Richly full, noble tone.” At this point Gergiev lost all conviction and doubled the tempo, with brass blatting and timpani pounding with crude force, negating all positive feelings that had come before.

In the final concert of the cycle, Gergiev turned in a decent performance of the Adagio from the unfinished Tenth Symphony and a brisk reading of Mahler’s last completed work, the Ninth. Most impressive in the latter was the savage Rondo-Burleske, an effective but skin-deep effort that Mahler wrote to prove to his critics that he too could write counterpoint. There was a good deal of clipping the music’s full note values at crucial moments and speeding up unnecessarily. And in the section prior to the finale’s climax, which Mahler marks Stets sehr gehalten (“still holding back”), he doubled the tempo, vitiating the impact of the climax.

For readers who didn’t share my letdown, Gergiev has recorded the Mahler cycle with the LSO on the orchestra’s own label.  


Walking the Dogs

I was walking our three Bichon Frises the other evening, and a woman and her husband, both middle-aged, approach and she exclaims, “How beautiful! Are those Bichon Freeze?” I assent and she continues to extol their virtues. “They don’t shed, do they?” she asks (more a statement). “No,” I answer. “Well, I want a Pomeranian,” she says. “Do they shed?” I ask. “Yes. My husband will be very upset.” “Then why would you get one?” I ask. “Because I want it,” she huffs. I turn to the husband, who stands there mute, smiling, and I say, “You had better have a serious talk with her tonight.” She frowns at me and says, “Well, I’m getting one!” and marches off with the husband in tow.


Looking Forward

My week’s scheduled concerts:

3/19 Avery Fisher Hall. New York Philharmonic/Esa-Pekka Salonen; Michelle DeYoung, mezzo; Gábor Bretz, bass. Ligeti: Concert Românesc. Haydn: Symphony No. 7 (Le Midi). Bartók: Bluebeard’s Castle.

3/21 Metropolitan Opera. Tchaikovsky: Queen of Spades. Andris Nelsons, cond.; Karita Mattila, Dolora Zajick, Vladimir Galouzine, Peter Mattei.

3/23 Zankel Hall. Midori, violin; Charles Abramovic, piano. Works by Huw Watkins, Toshio Hosokawa, James MacMillan, John Adams.

3/24 Avery Fisher Hall. New York Philharmonic/Esa-Pekka Salonen; Olli Mustonen, piano. Haydn: Symphony No. 8 (Le Soir). Bartók: Piano Concerto No. 1; Miraculous Mandarin Suite; Ligeti: Clocks and Clouds.

3/25 Alice Tully Hall. Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center. Mahler: Piano Quartet in A minor. Berg: Piano Sonata, Op. 1; Shostakovich: Piano Trio No. 1; Bartók: Piano Quintet.

3/26 Carnegie Hall. Toronto Symphony/Peter Oundjian; Itzhak Perlman, violin. Britten: Four Sea Interludes from Peter Grimes. Bruch: Violin Concerto No. 1. John Estacio: Frenergy. Vaughan Williams: Symphony No. 4.

3/27 Alice Tully Hall. Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center. Belcea Quartet. Mozart: Quartet in B-flat, K. 589. Turnage: new work (NY premiere). Beethoven: Quartet in B-flat, Op. 130, with Grosse Fuge, Op. 133.

3/31 Avery Fisher Hall. New York Philharmonic/Michael Tilson Thomas; Anne-Sophie Mutter, violin. Prokofiev: American Overture. Gubaidulina: In Tempus Praesens (Violin Concerto). Tchaikovsky: Symphony No. 2 (Little Russian).

Red Detachment Redux

March 17th, 2011

By Cathy Barbash

Nixon in China has come and gone from the Met, but its interpolated excerpt of The Red Detachment of Women brought back memories of a previous attempt to tour the entire work in the U.S., and made me wonder whether in fact Americans know it only in this mediated form.

First staged by the National Ballet of China (then known as the Central Ballet) in Beijing in 1964, The Red Detachment of Women was one of the eight “model operas” permitted performance during China’s Cultural Revolution. And while the company has toured America several times, Red Detachment sightings have been scarce. Arts Midwest and Mid-America Arts Alliance had booked them for an extended Midwest tour for the fall of 2001, with repertoire including a full-length Red Detachment, but the company cancelled because of post-9/11 jitters. Previous U.S. engagements included an 11-city tour in ’86 with a mixed program not including Red Detachment, and a ’95 gala performance at Cal Performances (Berkeley), which did include a truncated version of the ballet. Their 2005 tour including the Kennedy Center’s Festival of China and BAM included their new signature work, Raise the Red Lantern, inspired by Zhang Yimou’s 1991 movie of the same name.

Digging deeper uncovered a few amusing coincidences. When the Met’s artistic staff was assembling its program notes and organizing its ancillary activities for Nixon, perhaps it did not realize that the first place any of Red Detachment was seen in the U.S. was in fact on their very own stage and under their own auspices. A scene from the ballet was presented on July 17, 1978 as part of a gala program featuring the “Performing Arts Company of the PRC” in a variety of genres. Jointly produced by the National Committee on United States-China Relations and the Metropolitan Opera, the performance was the first stop of a multi-city tour that included Wolf Trap in Washington DC, Northrup Auditorium in Minneapolis, the Shrine Civic Auditorium in Los Angeles and the Berkeley Community Theater, and was likely the first time Chinese performances were presented in American A-list “legitimate” venues since Beijing Opera star Mei Lanfang’s tour in the 1930’s.

Furthermore, the excerpt presented, “Chang-ching Points the Way,” is the very one that Mark Morris refracted for use in Nixon in China. As the dramatic climax of the ballet, it was also well-suited for opera. The Met’s program book in 1978 read:

Late at night in the coconut grove on Hainan Island. After fleeing from the manor of a despotic landlord named Tyrant of the South, Wu Ching-hua is captured again by the tyrant, beaten by his lackies, and rescued by Hung Chang-ching, who shows her the way to the liberated area.

Fortunately for culture in China, the end of the Cultural Revolution (late ‘70s) and the beginning of the Reform and Opening Up (‘80s) also showed Chinese dance the way to a more liberated area.

Do the noble thing, Riccardo

March 17th, 2011

by Keith Clarke

As music awards go, you can’t get much more glitzy than the $1m Birgit Nilsson Prize that Riccardo Muti has just picked up. Well, he doesn’t actually pick it up until October, at a ceremony in the Stockholm Royal Opera in the presence of H.M. King Carl XVI Gustaf and H.M. Queen Silvia, which gives everyone time to polish up their tiaras and have the tux dry cleaned. It is only the second time the award has been made, Placido Domingo being the only previous recipient of the legendary Swedish soprano’s bequest.

Not many would argue that Muti is worthy of the award, which was set up to honor an individual working in opera or classical music. But isn’t there something faintly obscene in giving a million bucks to a man who is not short of a cent and has made his fortune by waving a stick at impoverished musicians?  I’m sure the story we’re looking forward to seeing at the front end of this site is when Muti magnanimously declares that he is donating his win to musical charities.

*****

It was a nice piece of timing, Northern Ireland’s arts organizations learning of a reprieve on funding cuts on the eve of St Patrick’s Day. Their colleagues in England are probably wishing for similarly saintly help, but the calendar is against them. England’s patron saint, St George, has his day on 23 April. Arts Council England is declaring its bloody hand a full 24 days earlier, on 30 March.

Concert Etiquette

March 17th, 2011

by Edna Landau 

Dear Edna:

 I am a violinist in an Artist Diploma program at a conservatory and am currently preparing for some recitals, including my first in my home town. This includes thinking about what I am going to wear. I notice a trend among female violinists to wear strapless gowns and have heard that this is because the sound of the violin projects better when placed against the bare skin. I can’t help but think that they also believe it can’t hurt to look a bit sexy on stage since audiences like that. Is there a danger here of going overboard? —fashion conscious

 Dear fashion conscious:

 There most certainly is a danger of going overboard. Your main concern in a recital should be to display the musical gifts with which you have been endowed. Anything that causes the audience to divert their attention from that dilutes the impact of your performance and affects the memory of it that people carry away with them. Your chosen concert dress should certainly be elegant and show you off at your best. It should also be so comfortable and secure that you never have to think about it while performing. Nothing is more disconcerting than an artist on stage periodically pulling up a falling strap or the bodice of a dress that has slipped a little too low. You should also make sure that you are properly supported by more than your accompanist (!). My good friend and colleague, Monica Felkel, of Young Concert Artists suggests having someone video you beforehand in your concert dress, both playing and bowing. You will immediately be able to judge whether you are revealing more of yourself than you intended. When in doubt, err on the conservative side. You will undoubtedly still look beautiful and people will remember you for your artistry.

********** 

Dear Edna:

As a singer, I am often faced with the dilemma of whether to discourage audiences from clapping between movements of a song cycle. I realize that instrumentalists confront this issue as well but I think that there may be something particular about the mood that is established in a marriage of music and words that is easily shattered by applause after each song, some of which may be rather brief. Needless to say, all artists are grateful for a sign of appreciation from their audience but in this situation, it can be very challenging to sustain the flow of the entire work and not to lose one’s concentration. What do you think is the right thing to do? —D.L.

Dear D.L.:

Much has been written about this topic, ranging from a lively discussion on violinist.com (http://www.violinist.com/discussion/print.cfm?ID=14667) to a revelatory article by Alex Ross, entitled “Why So Serious?“. In that article he describes concerts in the 19th century during which audience members moved about and applause frequently broke out after individual movements, and sometimes even during them. The practice of withholding applause only became widespread in the early 20th century. There are many performers and music enthusiasts today who long for the spontaneity of the 19th century and advocate for easing up the formal concert behavior to which we have become accustomed. This is certainly reflected in the proliferation of alternative concert venues and more informal modes of dress.

My own feeling is that we should try not to alienate audiences by expressing displeasure when they clap between movements of a work, especially if the music reaches such a high level of excitement (for example, after the first movement of the Tchaikovsky Violin Concerto) that it is hard, and perhaps unnatural, to refrain from clapping. We want newcomers to classical music to come back for more and not to sit in fear that they will violate proper protocol. In orchestral circumstances, it might be possible for a conductor to hold off applause at a seemingly inappropriate moment by keeping his or her baton outstretched. However, when you are alone on stage with a pianist and feel strongly that people should refrain from clapping until the end of the work, I believe you have two options: 1) ask the concert presenter to print in the program that the artist would like to present this work as one continuous whole, without interruption, and respectfully requests that any applause be held until after the completion of the final song 2) you choose to speak to the audience just before this work, sharing a welcome insight about it, and then incorporate in your remarks your hope that should they enjoy your performance, they will choose to save up their applause for a hearty ovation at the end. One important note of caution: If you know you are performing for a highly knowledgeable and experienced concertgoing audience, it is better to take your chances and not opt for either of the above choices. You may still want to speak to them but you should avoid the caveat.

Copyright Edna Landau

Club Kids Don’t Cry: A New Work by Keigwin + Company

March 14th, 2011

The first generation of American concert choreographers distanced themselves from the dance club and fashion world. They wanted to elevate dance, not point out its relationship to entertainment and consumerism. Not Larry Keigwin, who came of age in the late 1980s. The New York-born choreographer’s world premiere of Exit at The Joyce Theater (March 8-13) takes the underground club world, with all its narcissism, nihilism and fashion-ism as its subject matter. Known for his embrace of popular culture (working with The Radio City Rockettes and more recently for New York Fashion Week), Keigwin’s evening-length work for his seven-member pickup troupe is a significant departure. It’s serious. And that is its greatest weakness. Take seriously preening and posing clubbers? Come on. Dancer Liz Riga was sporting retro-inspired makeup reminiscent of the rock band Kiss.

Friend and fellow dance critic Marina Harss commented that Exit, seen on March 9, isn’t dark enough. “They look like such good kids,” she said. Keigwin probably hoped to create a self-destructive vision of club culture, choreographing his athletic performers to repeatedly fall to the floor and pulverize each other. But because these dancers always sauntered to and slithered against a black wall (designed by Dane Laffrey), a message of safety first (exhibitionism second) reigned. The desire to create danger, even with Burke Wilmore’s Blade Runner style lighting, didn’t develop. So, Exit bordered between the mundane and the simulacrum silly. When Aaron Carr appeared in a white mesh top, a black thong, and silver stilettos, lip synching Sammy Davis Jr.’s rendition of the 1967 song I’ve Got to be Me, he looked less like a transvestite and more like a teenager strutting for his pals in the safety of his dorm room. Carr, a succinct and luscious mover, is just too clean cut looking to convincingly play the outsider.

The composer Jerome Begin—who performed on a keyboard synthesizer and weaved layers of beats and sounds like a wizard at his cauldron—was the most believable member of the crew. Playing below and stage right of the dancers, Begin did exactly what DJs are revered for: Keeping the club mood subtly changing and increasing in intensity. Also of note were the final moments of Exit, when Keigwin’s choreography echoed Begin’s ricocheting sound riffs. At this moment, Carr’s tossing spiraling limbs influenced the next dancer’s movements, and then the next. Like a wave of energy, the dancers became united as they cascaded toward the wings to their final exit. It was a beautiful moment. Hopefully, Keigwin will have the opportunity to develop more transcendence in Exit as it tours the country in the coming year. Because Keigwin isn’t just a 1980s club kid. Like most interesting artists, he’s moving forward.