Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Transitioning From One Management to Another

Thursday, May 17th, 2012

By: Edna Landau

To ask a question, please write Ask Edna.

Dear Edna:

I am a young conductor who has been fortunate to have management for the past several years as a result of having participated in a showcase and attracting someone’s attention there. While I must admit I have been disappointed with the number of engagements this association has yielded, several of which came through my own connections, I still consider myself lucky. Recently, I made the acquaintance of a manager who handles conductors whose careers are in higher gear than mine. He has shown what seems to be genuine interest in me and I am wondering if you can tell me how artists transition from one manager to another with as little disruption as possible. Thank you.—J.B.

Dear J.B.:

Thank you for your question, which I am sure will be of interest to a number of our readers. You do not indicate whether you have a representation agreement with your manager. If you did, it would probably spell out rather clearly the steps that would be taken should you wish to go to another representative or should your manager wish to terminate the current relationship. Typically, an initial management agreement is for three years, with a provision to extend for an additional period (often two years) or to roll over automatically each year, unless either party informs the other of a wish to terminate within a specified period prior to the anniversary of the date of signing the original agreement. This notification period could be as long as a year prior to the end date of the contract, or as little as 90 days prior. Once notice has been given, the manager will generally give the artist a summary of all current activity on their behalf. This would consist of contracted dates, dates not yet contracted but firmly held, and a list of presenters who have expressed interest for the coming season or two but where no specific dates have been held or a variety of dates have been discussed. The manager is then entitled to do everything possible to bring all potential dates to fruition and take full commission on anything contracted prior to the termination date. (If they are unsuccessful in completing that process, they might negotiate a split commission with the new manager who will finish things off.) As part of taking full commission, the manager is expected to service the dates when they transpire, even though that may be after the artist moves on to another management. If the artist elects to have the dates serviced by the new manager and the new manager agrees, there is no problem with that; however the initial manager is still entitled to full commission. The new manager might only be willing to service those dates for a small commission, in which case it is up to the artist to decide whether they want to pay it or not.

There are times when managers will bend the rules a little, especially if the old manager and new one are friends. In your case, since your current manager hasn’t been overly active on your behalf, they might be willing to let the new manager begin booking you prior to the termination of the contract, as long as they can finish up everything they started and take commission on it. Another possibility might be that they agree to share commission with your new manager in exchange for relaxing the exclusive booking right they have a right to enforce. It will be very helpful if your current manager takes the time to write to all the presenters with whom they have been in contact on your behalf to let them know of the impending change. Then, when you move to the new agency, your manager there should similarly let everyone know that you have come on board. If this coincides with the start of a new season, it will probably be apparent on the management’s roster where many tend to put an asterisk next to the name of new artists. If you have never had a written agreement with your current manager, there are obviously no obligations on either side but the above guidelines are both traditional and very sensible. It would be a good idea to propose that they be followed and you are likely to thereby ensure that there is as little confusion and disruption of the booking process as possible. Good luck!

To ask a question, please write Ask Edna.

© Edna Landau 2012

Sneaking Artists Into The US: How Lucky Do You Feel?

Wednesday, April 25th, 2012

By Brian Taylor Goldstein

Dear FTM Arts Law:

I represent a British group that frequently tours the US. In the past, the guys have just entered as visitors under the ESTA/Visa Waiver Scheme. So far, we have never had any problems, but I was recently told this was wrong. Is this true? Couldn’t they just say they are not performing?

This one is easy: Is this true? YES. Couldn’t they just say they are not performing? NO!

The ESTA/Visa Waiver Scheme is a program through which citizens of 36 countries (Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brunei, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, San Marino, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom) can enter the US as “visitors” with only their passports. Unlike citizens from countries such as Russia, China, or Iran, citizens of one of the 36 “visa waiver” countries do not need to obtain an actual visitor visa from a US Consulate before entering the US. All they need to do is pre-register through the on-line Electronic System for Travel Authorization (“ESTA”) website. However, the ESTA/Visa Waiver Scheme only allows such citizens to enter as “visitors”, subject to all of the limitations and restrictions of a visitor visa.

If an artist from a visa waiver country wishes to perform in the US, he or she needs to obtain an actual artist visa, such as an O or a P visa. Artists from a visa waiver country who enter the US under the ESTA/Visa Waiver Scheme cannot perform, regardless of whether or not they are paid and regardless of whether or not tickets are sold. The need for an artist visa (either an O or a P) is triggered by performance, not payment.

If an artist tells a US border officer that they are not performing, when, in fact, they intend to perform, this constitutes a fraudulent entry. Fraud is always a bad thing. Fraud against the US Government is a very bad thing. While you may have not have had any problems thus far, this has been due to pure luck. I know of a group from Canada that for more than five years regularly entered the US as visitors to perform their concerts. Typically, they told the border officer they were coming to “rehearse” or “jam with friends.” However, last year, their luck ran out. A border officer on a slow day decided to Google the name of one of the musicians and discovered their website listing all of their forthcoming US engagements. The group has now been barred from performing in the US! I know of other instances where, though the artists have not been barred from future US travel, their ESTA/Visa Waiver privileges have been permanently revoked, requiring them to forever obtain visitor visas even where they legitimately wish to enter the US as visitors.  In short, your odds of continued success decrease each time your artists enter the US on the Visa Waiver Scheme with the intent to perform. As for lying to a border officer…I hear the weather in Guantanamo is quite lovely this time of year!

___________________________________________________________________

For additional information and resources on this and other legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ftmartslaw-pc.com.

To ask your own question, write to lawanddisorder@musicalamerica.org.

All questions on any topic related to legal and business issues will be welcome. However, please post only general questions or hypotheticals. FTM Arts Law reserves the right to alter, edit or, amend questions to focus on specific issues or to avoid names, circumstances, or any information that could be used to identify or embarrass a specific individual or organization. All questions will be posted anonymously.

__________________________________________________________________

THE OFFICIAL DISCLAIMER:

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!

The purpose of this blog is to provide general advice and guidance, not legal advice. Please consult with an attorney familiar with your specific circumstances, facts, challenges, medications, psychiatric disorders, past-lives, karmic debt, and anything else that may impact your situation before drawing any conclusions, deciding upon a course of action, sending a nasty email, filing a lawsuit, or doing anything rash!

Posting Musical Performances on YouTube

Wednesday, April 4th, 2012

By Robyn Guilliams

Dear Law and Disorder,

What are the copyright issues in posting a performance of a piece of music on YouTube for global streaming?  And, since people can easily download YouTube content, what are the implications for the person who’s posted it, or the downloaders for that matter?

Before answering your question, I want to clarify that there are two separate copyrights in a videotape of a musical performance – the copyright in the music contained in the video, and the copyright in the video itself.  The copyright is usually owned by the creator of a work.  In the case of the musical composition, the copyright would be owned by the composer (or perhaps the composer’s publisher, if he or she has one.)  In the case of the video, the owner of the copyright would be whoever created the video (and NOT the individual performers – which is a common misconception!)

Now, on to your question…  The answer depends on who owns the copyrights to the video, and the underlying music in the video.  If you make a video of yourself performing your own music, and you post that video on YouTube, there are no copyright issues.  Because you own the music being performed, AND you own the video, you have the right to post that video on YouTube or anywhere else on the Internet.

However, the answer changes if you don’t own the music.  If the musical copyright is owned by someone else, you would need that person’s permission to perform the music (i.e., a performance license for the music), to videotape the performance (a synchronization license), AND to broadcast that video via the Internet (a performance license for the video).  Of course, it’s not necessary to have three separate documents, but you would want to be sure you have all of the permissions you need in one license!

The answer also depends on who owns the videotape of the performance.  As noted above, the owner of a video usually will be the person who creates the video.  So, if you perform your own music, but someone else records that performance, then that person will own the video, and you would need that person’s permission to post the video on YouTube.

Downloads implicate yet another potential license requirement – a distribution license!  If you don’t have a right to distribute the video – or the music contained in the video – both you and the illegal downloader could be liable to the copyright holders.

The moral here is that, before posting any audio or video recording on the Internet, be sure you have all of the necessary permissions – preferably in writing!

__________________________________________________________________________

For additional information and resources on this and other legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ftmartslaw-pc.com.

To ask your own question, write to lawanddisorder@musicalamerica.org.

All questions on any topic related to legal and business issues will be welcome. However, please post only general questions or hypotheticals. FTM Arts Law reserves the right to alter, edit or, amend questions to focus on specific issues or to avoid names, circumstances, or any information that could be used to identify or embarrass a specific individual or organization. All questions will be posted anonymously.

__________________________________________________________________

THE OFFICIAL DISCLAIMER:

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE!

The purpose of this blog is to provide general advice and guidance, not legal advice. Please consult with an attorney familiar with your specific circumstances, facts, challenges, medications, psychiatric disorders, past-lives, karmic debt, and anything else that may impact your situation before drawing any conclusions, deciding upon a course of action, sending a nasty email, filing a lawsuit, or doing anything rash!

Which Matters More: What You Sing or Where You Sing It?

Thursday, February 16th, 2012

By: Edna Landau

To ask a question, please write Ask Edna.

Congratulations to soprano, Amy Oraftik, whose question below won Second Prize in The Ask Edna First Anniversary contest. Amy wins a free review of her press kit or website.

Dear Edna:

I am an opera singer who recently graduated from school. In my first year out, I had a variety of opportunities. I sang at a well-respected young artist program, sang in the chorus of a B level opera house and have been singing lead roles at very small/low budget opera companies. At every turn, I’ve had to decline one opportunity in order to pursue another. For example, to sing chorus I had to turn down outreach work with the young artist program and to do a lead role at a small house, I had to turn down a chorus opportunity that would have paid more. I know that what matters most is talent, but I’m just not sure what the best choices are to build a resume and a career. It’s exciting and fulfilling to have roles but the venues are anything but impressive; whereas the young artist programs and chorus positions I get are with opera companies that are impressive and pay more, even though I don’t get to be a featured singer. My question is this: When casting directors and agents consider engaging an artist, do they care more about what the artist has performed or where they performed it? —Amy Oraftik

Dear Amy:

It is actually a bit hard to answer your question in a vacuum without knowing more about your overall career aspirations and financial realities. If your dream is to be a “featured singer” and you have reason to think that you will achieve that some day, based on feedback from your teachers and other professionals who know your work, it probably makes sense for you to go on singing lead roles, even in smaller houses, in order to build your repertoire and gain experience in those roles. Working in a young artist program can also prove beneficial, as many such programs are watched by agents and casting directors, provided that they are at a certain level. If your financial situation is such that you need to do chorus work from time to time to make ends meet, perhaps you can fit that in whenever possible.

To answer the question in your last sentence, agents and casting directors are definitely influenced by where you have sung. If your experience has only been in small companies and there is no evidence that you are advancing to new levels or attracting the attention of their colleagues, they are unlikely to make offers to you. This could well prove frustrating to you after a while and have a significant impact on your income. If you truly enjoy chorus work and feel that you could be very satisfied with the potential income, as well as the opportunity to sing in high quality productions that you find inspiring, this might be an equally good option for you. You might even find yourself singing alongside individuals who, at some point, enjoyed active careers as soloists. These are difficult economic times and everyone needs to find stability in their lives, especially if they have a family to support.

Soprano Laura Claycomb has a very interesting and informative blog on which she offers career advice in the “Young Artist Corner”. A recent column, written by bass, Martin L. Poock, shared the rewards of being a professional chorister. It sounds to me like Mr. Poock found himself in a situation exactly like yours at one point. He writes very honestly about his past quandaries and how he resolved them. While his decisions will not necessarily dictate your own, I think you will find it beneficial to read what he has written. All the very best of luck to you!

To ask a question, please write Ask Edna.

© Edna Landau 2012

Bernstein Recordings Never Die

Friday, November 4th, 2011

by Sedgwick Clark

Leonard Bernstein is one of the few artists whose recordings have continued to sell after his death, and last fall Sony Classical reissued a “limited edition” set of the conductor’s 1950s-70s symphony recordings, most with the New York Philharmonic. But it sold out before I could rehear the CDs, and this write-up has been sitting in my computer awaiting a second run, which is now at hand again to beguile the Christmas gift crowd.

Many of these recordings are my favorites of the works, and those happy with a classy coffee-table presentation need look no further. It’s a beautiful looking design, to be sure, but an utterly impractical fit in a CD collection. The box is LP size and two and a half inches thick. One must lay the box flat and remove the top to get to the CDs. A plastic divider holds four stacks of the 60 CDs, each encased in a cardboard sleeve. Without long fingernails, one must often resort to an implement to pry the bottom-most CD from the holder. For three months while I spot-checked the discs, the box shuttled from room to room in fruitless search for a home. I was tempted to discard the box and file the discs on my conventional CD shelf, but the spine copy is infinitesimal, with titles of the works too dark to be read without klieg lights and a magnifying glass. The 32-page b&w booklet with two adoring tri-lingual tributes to Bernstein and a mixture of familiar and rare photos has no notes on the symphonies; no texts and translations for choral works. Nor is recording info as specific as in earlier CD releases.

Nevertheless, these are Bernstein recordings, and in general I prefer these more spontaneous Columbia/CBS recordings now on Sony Classical to the later, more carefully coiffed Deutsche Grammophon ones, usually with the Vienna Philharmonic, which many see as his “mature” statements. Tempos are broader on DG—sometimes egregiously so—and often preferred by European critics. DG has released most or all of them in smaller, more manageable bargain sets, but the only ones I can recommend unreservedly are the American and Haydn sets, the latter containing an irresistible “Oxford.”

My Sony picks:

Beethoven: Exciting and unpredictable. I prefer Bernstein’s “smaller” symphony performances, especially Nos. 1 and 2, over the uneven-numbered later ones, where he is concerned with making Big Statements. I found the DG remakes cautious and overly refined, an opinion reaffirmed after rehearing the recently reissued CD set.

Bizet: Symphony in C. Less than immaculate ensemble, but what joie de vivre!

Copland: Organ Symphony and Third Symphony. His Copland is indispensable.

Dvořák: Symphony No. 9. An exciting “New World.” Avoid the bloated DG.

Harris: Third Symphony. Also indispensable, as most of his American rep is.

Haydn: Symphonies Nos. 82-88, 93-104. The staff of life. Also available in a handy set of all his Haydn for the label.

Hindemith: Symphony in E-flat. Revivified Hindemith! (Also get his recording with Isaac Stern of the Violin Concerto—gorgeous melodies, sparkling wit, my favorite Stern recording.)

Ives: Symphony No. 2. The height of Ivesian Americana, superb on all counts. Avoid the sleepy DG.

Liszt: A Faust Symphony. Romantic drama with tumultuous conviction.

Mahler: Symphonies Nos. 1-9. Yes, we know that others championed Mahler first, but these are the recordings that brought about the Mahler Boom. Some, such as the Third and Seventh, are still unsurpassed, even by Bernstein.

Nielsen: Symphonies Nos. 3 and 5. Peerless performances of the life-affirming “Sinfonia espansiva” and the profound, wartime Fifth.

Prokofiev: Classical Symphony. The New Yorkers sound downright tipsy in this jolly, Haydnesque interpretation.

Schumann: Symphonies Nos. 1 and 3. Schumann was in marital bliss when he wrote his “Spring” Symphony, and no one captures the music’s unbounded joy like Bernstein. The “Rhenish” is equally vital.

William Schuman: Symphonies Nos. 3, 5, and 8. The rip-snorting Third is one of the great American symphonies, incomparably rendered here by Schuman’s most galvanic interpreter. Far superior to his DG remake of 25 years later.

Shostakovich: All of Bernstein’s Shostakovich CDs have good points, but the Fifth is one of his half-dozen greatest recordings, taped at Boston’s Symphony Hall on the way home from the Philharmonic’s famous Soviet tour in 1959. For me, it has no competition.

Sibelius: Symphonies Nos. 1-7. Big, broadly paced, and hyper-emotional—right from the Russian tradition. Numbers 5 and 7, in particular, are immensely powerful.

Vaughan Williams: Symphony No. 4. A searingly intense interpretation of this explosive 20th-century masterpiece.

 

Final curtain

Friday, October 21st, 2011

by Keith Clarke

The Royal College of Music always keeps its music staff busy, but it looks like the lawyers might be earning their keep on its latest offering. Lisbon Contemporary Music Ensemble is visiting with the world premiere of a new one-act opera “based on the real-life events surrounding Dominique Strauss-Khan.”

A press release outlines the plot: “A middle-aged businessman arrives at a hotel run by a concierge who promises to provide him with anything he could possibly desire. Fearing the best years of his life are over – despite a loving wife at home – he finds himself haunted by ghosts of desire and jealousy. Accepting the concierge’s offer, a young maid soon arrives at his suite. However, she later claims she was savagely attacked, while he protests his innocence.”

With fresh allegations swirling around the former International Monetary Fund chief, he will probably be too busy to turn up in South Kensington to judge the artistic merits of the piece.

>>>

If you were going to try and get inner-city teenagers interested in classical music, would you start with a three-hour piece about the crucifixion by a long-dead German? That is the brave plan of Suzi Digby, aka Lady Eatwell, who has launched an enterprising scheme – Vocal Futures – to sign up some 1,500 young ambassadors worldwide and build an online community to spread the word about classical music via Facebook and Twitter. The whole thing kicks off with three performances of the St Matthew Passion in a London bunker designed for testing concrete, launching a project which then goes on to Los Angeles, Cologne, Shanghai and Johannesburg. Read all about it at http://www.vocalfutures.org/

>>>

This completes my tour of duty on the MusicalAmerica blogspot, which I hope has given some kind of idea of the musical world as seen from a London perspective. I shall still be popping up at the sharp end of the site for as long as the editor puts up with me, but from the blogosphere it’s cheerio. As the BBC presenter John Ebdon used to say, “If you have been, thanks for listening.”

Janet Baker’s lifetime

Thursday, October 6th, 2011

by Keith Clarke

On the day that she receives Gramophone’s Lifetime Achievement Award at London’s Dorchester Hotel, mezzo-soprano Dame Janet Baker gives a fascinating interview in today’s Telegraph [click here].
.
She reveals her regret at how when Karajan contacted her agent, the legendary Emmie Tillett, to book Baker for the Salzburg Festival, he was sent on his way because the mezzo had a prior engagement.

It’s a familiar story, for regret seems to be Baker’s middle name. She regretted that it took the opera establishment so long to book her for the big roles. She regretted, as she tells Rupert Christiansen in this Telegraph piece, that “musicians weren’t, as I had naively assumed, always the nicest or easiest people to work with.”

And the regret went deeper, for a singer who has always been more interested in honesty than public relations. In a radio interview some years ago, the presenter asked her, looking back over her career and its cost to her personal life, had it all been worthwhile? There was a long silence before she said, simply – no, it hadn’t.

>>>

A recent survey revealed that 90 per cent of UK surgeons have music playing in the operating theatre as they work. Of those, about half worked the scalpels to up-tempo rock music, 17 per cent favored pop, and 11 per cent classical. Plastic surgeons played the most; ear, nose and throat specialists the least.

The question is, which piece of classical music would you want blasting away as the surgeon set to work? Top choice for pop fans is easy: Rolling Stones, Let It Bleed.

Play it again, Nige

Thursday, September 29th, 2011

by Keith Clarke

Having ditched EMI after 15 years, demon fiddler Nigel Kennedy is making a splash with his new label, Sony Classical, his first disc re-exploring Vivaldi’s Four Seasons, complete with improvisation, progressive rock, female vocals. Oh, and drums. As he gracefully explained to The Scotsman: “With Vivaldi I always think I f***ing own this music, but when I realised I was going to be touring it again, I had to do something new with it. I couldn’t do the same shit as when I done the last album.”

The something new includes an encore, “It’s Plucking Elemental,” sung by Kennedy, who introduces it with a belch.

It will all probably fan the flames of fundamentalist ire, although even die-hard traditionalists should have become inured to Nige’s wilder excesses by now.

Those of us who are long enough in the tooth to remember the clean-cut young middle-class boy who first appeared as Nigel Kennedy, with a neat short-back-and-sides and impeccable vowels, may have smiled at the in-yer-face wild boy that subsequently emerged. Ten years ago, he was upsetting then Proms chief Sir John Drummond with his plans to play the Berg Violin Concerto wearing a black cloak and Dracula make-up.

Whatever the silliness, and however much his manufactured street-kid accent grates, the one thing that Kennedy has to do to shut up all the tut-tutters is pick up the violin. He would be easy to dismiss as a style-before-substance also-ran if it were not for the fact that he still plays the violin as if his life depended on it. He could charm the pants off a dowager with a gypsy dance, bring tears to the eyes of a statue with a Bach partita. So forgive me if I don’t join in the chorus of disapproval.

Dynamic Duo

Thursday, September 22nd, 2011

by Keith Clarke

How many percussionists does it take to fill a concert hall? Just two, apparently. I am on retreat in South Wales, where on Tuesday the annual Tenby Arts Festival served up O Duo, aka Owen Gunnell and Oliver Cox, two young musicians who met at music college and put together an act that has kept them on the road for the best part of ten years.

You can expect things to go with a bang when you have two percussionists on the programme, and Gunnell and Cox certainly have what it takes when it comes to thwacking things and whipping up a storm. But the notable thing for me is the sheer delicacy of their playing. They center their act round two giant marimbas, although an extensive kitchen fills the rest of the stage. And while there is much beautifully choreographed fun and games, it is less expected to hear a serene Sarabande from a Bach keyboard Partita coming out of two massive instruments with such subtlety.

Aside from the sheer musicality bouncing off these two players, they offer an object lesson in how to take control of your destiny on exiting music college. The conservatoires are churning out talented musicians on endless conveyor belts, but the jobs market cannot hope to keep up. It takes a bit of ingenuity to create work and stay in it, so let’s have a drum roll and a crash on the cymbals to celebrate the wonder of O Duo. You can catch some their work here.

>>>

The row over the suspension of four London Philharmonic players rumbles on. The four added their names to a letter protesting the inclusion of the Israel Philharmonic in the Proms programme, adding weight to their signatures, perhaps, by identifying themselves as LPO players. This did not play well with many of the orchestra’s supporters, who are more LPO than PLO, and made their feelings known to orchestra chief Tim Walker.

His response – a nine-month ban for the four – seems harsh. In Tuesday’s Guardian, chief arts writer Charlotte Higgins opined: “The whole London Philharmonic affair has made the orchestra look unbelievably, well, stupid.” Maybe, maybe not. There will be many orchestra CEOs who sympathize. Walker, who has only recently emerged from a damaging episode when the orchestra was defrauded by its financial director, has an orchestra to run, against a backdrop of diminishing support and a general downturn. Cheesing off his funders would not be the greatest way of protecting the orchestra.

Some enchanted evening

Thursday, September 15th, 2011

by Keith Clarke

OK, I admit it, the editor was right. I went along to the Lincoln Center production of South Pacific at the Barbican last week and had a jolly good time. It wasn’t an overnight conversion to the world of the musical, and I can’t say I didn’t look at my watch just now and again, but it was a terrific show, and I was probably the only person in the 1,160-seat Barbican Theater who didn’t know how it came out until it came out.

But as an infrequent frequenter of musicals, I do find some aspects of the experience that really stick in the craw. Most of all, why does the audience feel obliged to yack all the way through the overture? Is the music only worthy of attention when someone’s singing?

At least this was a show that stayed on the non-cheesy side of cheesy. And in an idiom that lives on its foot-stomping, up a key, play to the gallery conventions, that says a lot. Heaven knows, it’s bad enough in the opera when the chorus trips on spraying rose petals, but musicals really know how to lay the schmaltz on thick. This South Pacific didn’t, and I’m grateful. And the rest of our party wept buckets, so it must have been good.

>>>

The BBC’s in-house safety adviser has published a new report on protecting musicians’ hearing and come up with some useful suggestions. Sit further apart, it tells musicians. No doubt concert platforms on your side of the pond are generously proportioned, but in the UK if players start spreading out the brass will be tumbling off the back risers and the first fiddles will be back in the green room. Another helpful suggestion is that musicians should alleviate the effect of having their hair parted by the brass by chewing gum. But so many people go to see a concert as well as hear it, and televised high-definition relays tend to go in for dramatic close-ups of the players. Is the great British public ready for the vision of a symphony orchestra masticating its way through Mahler?

Meanwhile, another report, from Toronto, suggests that playing a musical instrument throughout life is likely to ensure better hearing into old age. This is good news for those of us who have managed to do that, and we live in hope that it will also protect us from muscular pain, tone up our brains, and stave off those “Where the hell did I put the keys” moments.