Archive for the ‘Curiously Random’ Category

In Praise of …

Tuesday, November 16th, 2010

By Alan Gilbert

I’ve often spoken about the uniquely awesome capacity of the New York Philharmonic, but I really must tip my hat to the musicians for what they have done over the last few weeks.

From Sunday, October 24, through Thursday, November 4, we were on tour in Europe, playing in familiar cities, such as Hamburg, Paris, and Luxembourg, and those that were new to most of the players, such as Belgrade – which the Orchestra hadn’t visited since 1959 – and Vilnius, where we just made our debut. Touring is demanding from a repertoire standpoint: the Orchestra must juggle multiple programs, which are mixed and matched in different combinations. On this particular tour there was some music that we also had to rehearse and perform while on the road. In Warsaw, our second concert featured Yulianna Avdeeva, the recently crowned winner of this year’s Chopin Piano Competition, playing Chopin’s E-minor Piano Concerto. One always feels a frisson of extra pressure when playing music that is both well known and beloved in its native land; in this case, a large ornament that hung above the stage didn’t let us forget how important, how connected to the Polish national psyche Chopin’s music is. (You are even reminded of that fact when you land at the Frederic Chopin International Airport!) Playing the orchestral accompaniment in Chopin’s concertos is far from straightforward, and in this case we had only one rehearsal, for a national broadcast, so it was even more of a challenge, but I must say that the Orchestra’s performance and the soloist’s, of course, were wonderful.

We also rehearsed Sibelius’s Violin Concerto with the tour’s other soloist, Leonidas Kavakos, while we were traveling, although it did help that we had just played the work in New York City with Joshua Bell.

On top of all this, on the day of the tour’s final concert, in Luxembourg, there was a preparatory rehearsal for Mendelssohn’s Elijah, the work that we were going to perform within a week, just after returning home from the tour. Elijah is a fantastic oratorio that combines moments of great drama with music of tremendous warmth and tenderness; at close to two hours and ten minutes, it’s practically an opera in its scope. I heard snatches of Mendelssohn cropping up while the musicians were warming up in the days preceding the work’s tour rehearsal; this wasn’t surprising, because it is what they do, but it was still impressive and gratifying. As if it wasn’t already enough that the musicians had to prepare this massive oratorio in the midst of everything else going on during the tour – they did so amazingly well.

You might think that the Orchestra would deserve a relatively light week upon returning from a European journey, and you would be right. That’s not how it was, though; we had the balance of the Elijah rehearsals and its three performances, and, to top it all off, we threw in a major concert at Carnegie Hall that featured Beethoven’s Violin Concerto, played by Midori, and John Adams’s Harmonielehre. This performance went extremely well, I think, so I couldn’t rightly say that we didn’t have enough rehearsal time for it. Let’s just say that I was amazed by what the musicians were able to accomplish considering how much, or little, preparation time we had.

Incidentally, I also want to observe that we have been lucky this fall to have a veritable parade of some of the greatest violinists in the world playing with us. I mentioned Midori, Kavakos, and Bell, and we also had Itzhak Perlman and Pinchas Zukerman. The violinistic riches continue this week with Anne-Sophie Mutter – I heard a few minutes of her rehearsal this morning, and know that New York is in for a treat.

(For more information on Alan Gilbert and the New York Philharmonic, visit nyphil.org.) 

Back from Tour … Stay Tuned

Tuesday, November 9th, 2010

By Alan Gilbert

As much as I enjoy putting my thoughts down in writing and sharing them here, in my blog, that is just not going to happen today. On Friday I returned from a very satisfying, very exciting, very busy tour, and although there is much about the time I spent in Europe that I’d like to write about, I just haven’t the time this week. I am already in rehearsals for this week’s performances of Mendelssohn’s Elijah

I promise not to let this become a habit, and that my next posting will be more thoughtful than this one.

Thanks for understanding!

On Tour(ing)

Tuesday, October 26th, 2010

By Alan Gilbert

We are in Ljubljana, the second stop on our European tour. It should have been the third country, but what would have been the Orchestra’s first trip to the Republic of Georgia was cancelled abruptly a few weeks ago by the presenters – that is to say, by the government of Georgia. I have not heard a convincing justification for this, and my friend Lisa Batiashvili, the brilliant Georgian violinist who was to have been the soloist in the planned concerts, and who was instrumental, in every way, in paving the way for our putative visit, is baffled as well. She is also embarrassed, and deeply disappointed that her efforts to bring the New York Philharmonic to her home country ended so sadly. I know from speaking with her of her love of her country, and how much she would like to help shape and enrich its musical life. Who knows now when those noble impulses will be able to come to fruition?
 
Since the Philharmonic had some unexpected extra days in New York City, we were able to add a non-subscription concert to our schedule. It was extremely fortunate that Pinchas Zukerman was available to give another performance of the Brahms Violin Concerto, which he played with us the week before. Since we were rehearsing the Academic Festival Overture for the tour, we were able to create an all-Brahms program that was filled out by the Fourth Symphony (another tour piece). Non-subscription concerts have to be sold from the ground up, obviously, and this one was only announced two weeks before it happened. It was therefore especially exciting that the concert sold out, and there was a real sense of event in the hall that evening. The Orchestra played unbelievably, and those of us onstage felt a palpable connection with the audience, who responded with real warmth. It was a great send-off for our tour.

The first concert of the tour happened on Sunday, in Belgrade. We were the closing event of Bemus, a two-week-long festival the city hosts. We played in the enormous Sava Center (seating capacity close to 4,000!), which was literally packed to the rafters. The previous night I had had dinner with U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Serbia Mary Burce Warlick and some of her staff, and they told us that they had never heard of the hall being sold out, explaining that usually the upper section is not even opened. And this, when the ticket prices were apparently 20 times what concerts tend to cost in Belgrade! It appears that there was a kind of frenzied excitement surrounding the orchestra’s visit. Part of this may have been the fact that it was actually a return visit: Leonard Bernstein brought the Philharmonic to Belgrade on the legendary round-the-world tour of 1959. One of the presenters made us a gift of an original program book and ticket stub from that concert – items that will be treasured additions to the Philharmonic Archives.
 
Sunday’s concert itself was a big success, and it felt appropriate to be able to play Bernstein’s “Lonely Town” as an encore. There was a sigh of recognition from the audience when I announced the piece – a sign of a connection between an American orchestra and an audience that would have been practically unimaginable five years ago, and absolutely impossible only ten years ago. It was a good feeling.

(For more information on Alan Gilbert and the New York Philharmonic, visit nyphil.org.)

Arts and Krafts

Tuesday, October 12th, 2010

By Alan Gilbert

One thing about great art is its ability to speak to a wide spectrum of humanity, and its uncanny knack for getting people with widely differing outlooks to see what they want to see in the work. This week Kraft, Magnus Lindberg’s landmark piece from 1985, has proven itself as a great work of art, as evidenced by the power and conviction of the responses it has provoked, responses I should say that have largely left the middle ground empty. I hasten to add that the reaction has been overwhelmingly positive.

Yes, some people walked out, but the real majority stayed, and their acclamation seemed to be congratulating us not only on the performance, but on our decision to offer this piece. This was not some fringe crowd: these were our beloved subscribers. Over the weekend I was stopped numerous times on the street by people who had heard the Philharmonic perform Kraft – all of them thanked me for providing this artistic experience for New York City. On Sunday, when I was in Citarella on the Upper West Side, a white-haired woman tapped me on the shoulder and said that she had heard Friday’s concert. I admit that I half expected a complaint, but was I wrong! She said that she has been a longtime subscriber, that she loves the New York Philharmonic, and that she had never had such an exciting experience at the Philharmonic as the one that Kraft had provided. Who would have guessed? She then mentioned that she was looking forward to our performance of Brahms next Saturday. Then there was the guy who stopped me when my kids were scootering through the park, who told me how happy he was to have experienced Kraft. He said that he wasn’t sure that he cared to hear the piece again, but that he was grateful to the Philharmonic for giving him the chance to get to know the work. He went on to thank me for making this orchestra culturally relevant again. What a perfect response to the work!

I write all this not to crow about our success, but to thank people for following us on this journey of musical exploration, for understanding what we are about as an arts organization. There’s no one who loves the music of Haydn and Brahms (to name only two) more than I do, and I never get tired of conducting or listening to Beethoven symphonies. But art is not meant only to be safe and predictable: I dare say that one of the things that made Kraft thrilling for so many was the fact that they had no idea that it would speak to them as it did.

The New York Philharmonic has long been one of the world’s greatest orchestras, and my job as Music Director is to preserve and build on this legacy. This means that we will continue to play the widest range of orchestral repertoire as well as it can be played, while at the same time taking risks, striving to add to New York City’s artistic landscape in a way that places this Orchestra squarely at the center of cultural and intellectual discourse.

(For more information on Alan Gilbert and the New York Philharmonic, visit nyphil.org.)

Continuity

Tuesday, October 5th, 2010

By Alan Gilbert

As I have been preparing my second posting here, I read a blog that admonished me for not “feeding the beast” by posting more frequently. This was nice to read, but I admit that it made me nervous about keeping up with the regular demand of writing. Of course I am very pleased that somebody out there wants me to blog even more, but from the outset I have wanted to manage expectations about how frequently I could realistically contribute here. It will be as often as possible, but probably only every two or three weeks.

Over the last year I often found myself feeling the urge to share random thoughts about my professional life; that urge would occasionally become so strong that I had the thought of writing a book flash across my mind – but let’s not get ahead of ourselves. For now, I’ll just repeat that it was nice to read that someone was actually looking forward to hearing what I have to say; I will try to post my thoughts and experiences here as often as I can.

In fact, my schedule over the past two weeks has been, if anything, even more intense than last year’s opening. The New York Philharmonic is in an unusual situation right now, with Zarin Mehta just having announced that he’s leaving in two years. While he’s very much still in the saddle, this announcement has created a shockwave throughout the organization, and everyone is having to consider, in a very conscious way, where they stand and how they fit into the long-range plans of the organization. The process of figuring out where we will go after Zarin leaves has begun, and everybody seems truly committed to making sure that the right steps are taken.

This is an opportunity to express my appreciation for everything Zarin has done for me and for the New York Philharmonic over the years: from my first experience with the Orchestra he was a champion and a supporter, and it is largely because of him that I am here. Working with him, being able to benefit from his enormous wealth of experience, from his natural elegance, has been an education and a joy for me. In particular, I have been struck by his interest in expanding the boundaries of what we do, in using music to touch the widest possible audience, and by his heartfelt belief in the necessity of taking artistic risks. The New York Philharmonic can mean many things to many different people, and Zarin has been one of the most powerful proponents for broadening the dimensions of our artistic reach. For now, he is still very much at work here, so I do not have to express all my thoughts about his contributions and legacy at this moment; I very much look forward to working with him over the next two seasons.

In a related area, the continuity of the orchestra is constantly on my mind, as there are many vacancies at the Philharmonic. Last week we concluded a round of very successful violin auditions, which resulted in the hiring of two new musicians. It is quite rare, actually, for both of the finalists to be offered positions, but we were lucky to have two exemplary candidates who were both masters of their instruments, and also came with an artistic sensibility that I am sure will add to the musical depth of the Orchestra.

Still, during this process I thought about auditions in general: it is incredibly complicated, as it has to accomplish a lot of things. The main one, obviously, is finding the right person, but another integral outcome is the self-referential need to instill and preserve confidence in the process itself. 

I learned some lessons in Stockholm where, over the years, we had problems with the audition process. When I was Chief Conductor there was a bizarre attitude about auditions: of course the stated policy was that auditions had to be taken, but, in practice, quite a few musicians were granted positions – and ultimately given tenure – who had never played an audition. The argument internally was, “They are the right person, we need to find the right person no matter what, and that’s more important than process.” That was refreshing in a way, because in Sweden it very often can seem as though process is more important than result, but there was a palpable negative effect: people lost faith in the way we ran auditions. They asked themselves why they should audition if it was possible to win a position without undergoing this particularly stressful process. Over time the auditions became less successful simply because not enough good people were presenting themselves as candidates. In fact, we knew of people who were interested in open positions who decided not even to try since they hoped to get into the orchestra through the back door, as it were.

Holding auditions is the system we have now. It doesn’t necessarily test all the qualities that are essential to function as a consummate orchestral musician, but we are constantly trying to reevaluate it so we can create the most telling process that is possible.

That’s some of what’s been on my mind. See you next time.

(For more information on Alan Gilbert and the New York Philharmonic, visit nyphil.org.)

A Day in the Life

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

by Alan Gilbert

I am not going to introduce this blog with a portentous statement about what it means to be a music director today. This isn’t going to be a philosophical platform. Rather, I think that people might be interested in going behind the scenes, to know what I imagine many would find to be an unexpected range of items that cross my desk as music director. The job requires what I think is an unusual attention to a range of issues. It’s not just a question of having the skill to deal with the issues – you have to see which areas actually are “areas,” because you can’t deal with something until you understand that it has to be dealt with. I am looking forward to sharing random, perhaps even haphazard, musings on the great variety of topics that I have the pleasure and, it turns out, the surprise of addressing in the regular course of my work as the New York Philharmonic’s 25th music director.

To kick things off I thought I might simply list what I accomplished – or tried to accomplish – in one specific day. Here is a partial summary of my agenda on Friday, September 17, the last day of the last week before the opening of my second season with this orchestra:

After dropping my son off at pre-Kindergarten, I …

  • • spoke with Larry Tarlow, the Principal Librarian, asking him when I could expect the final installment of Wynton Marsalis’s revision of his piece that we are performing on Opening Night (September 22),
  • • studied Dutilleux’s Métaboles (which I am conducting on the first subscription program of the season) for about 45 minutes, and
  • • had a conversation with Eric Latzky, our V.P. of Communications, in preparation for a wrap-up of the Ligeti Grand Macabre project we performed last May, for a video taping later in the day for the League-formerly-known-as-ASOL.
  • • Then I went and did the taping, which was an hour and a half in which I and others discussed Grand Macabre for what the League is using as an educational tool to help orchestras understand why we did such a project, how we approached it, what made it such a success, what we learned about doing this kind of project in general, and what we learned about how we function as an institution approaching such a new area.
  • • Afterward I had a business lunch that involved discussions about our tour to Europe in October.
  • • When I came back, I found the revised score for Wynton’s piece on my desk, and checked with the library to see how different it was from the last version I’d received.
  • • I flipped through the score as I scrambled to prepare for a meeting I was going to have with Wynton later in the day.
  • • I spent time with David Snead, our V.P. of Marketing, talking about how we are going to promote Kraft, an ambitious work by Magnus Lindberg that we will be performing in early October.
  • • Then I sat down with Monica Parks, our Director of Publications, to talk over ideas for this blog.

I’ll stop this recitation here, even before my meeting with Wynton, and only say that when I was in high school and first imagined what the Music Director of the New York Philharmonic would do, it never in my wildest dreams occurred to me that it wasn’t just studying the music and showing up for rehearsals and concerts. I would love to be able to spend three hours, if not more, immersed in studying a score, and it is very rare that I can do so, and there can be frustration when it’s impossible to carry something through to its logical conclusion. I am not complaining about the seeming interruptions and distractions. I feel lucky to have a job that calls on different capacities and is never boring – not for one second – and I find all the items that cross my agenda engaging, challenging, and fascinating. And I certainly would never say or assume that any or all of these details are more compelling than those that arise during your own work day; I just feel that they are idiosyncratically connected with being a music director in an American orchestra operating at the beginning of the 21st century, so I hope that they might be of interest to you.

See you soon … I’ve got to read my kids a bedtime story.

(For more information on Alan Gilbert and the New York Philharmonic, visit nyphil.org.)